The simplest, most effective and most achievable way to improve congressional oversight of intelligence might be to utilize the Government Accountability Office to audit and evaluate intelligence programs, a prospect that is opposed by the Director of National Intelligence. The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on Friday, February 29 […]
By Hans M. Kristensen The recent Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Air Force nuclear weapons safety was a welcome but long-overdue event. Internal reports about deteriorating nuclear weapon safety and surety in the Air Force have been accumulating since the early 1990s, but six nuclear weapons had to “disappear” for a day from Minot […]
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence provided an overview of U.S. intelligence data mining development programs in a new report to Congress (pdf). Data mining is used by intelligence agencies to search through databases in order to discern patterns of activity that could indicate a threat to national security. The new report presents […]
Although we have declined more requests for comment about Wikileaks than we have responded to, some participants in the project feel that we have said too much. Jay Lim of Wikileaks sent the following advisory email today: “Who’s side are you on here Stephen? It is time this constant harping stopped.” “You know full well […]
Some noteworthy new reports from the Congressional Research Service on nuclear weapons policy include the following (all pdf). “U.S. Nuclear Weapons: Changes in Policy and Force Structure,” updated January 23, 2008. “Nuclear Arms Control: The Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty,” updated January 18, 2008. “Managing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Policy Implications of Expanding Global Access to […]
The U.S. Army said today that it would restore public access to the online Reimer Digital Library of Army publications, after having blocked the site on February 6. Last week, the Federation of American Scientists filed a Freedom of Information Act request asking for a copy of the entire Reimer collection for publication on the […]
The Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility has declined to open an investigation into allegations that Justice Department attorneys improperly refused to respond to the Information Security Oversight Office when it challenged the Office of the Vice President’s failure to cooperate with ISOO’s oversight of the classification system. In a January 2, 2008 complaint, […]
Noteworthy new reports from the Congressional Research Service that have not been made readily available to the public include these (all pdf). “Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2007,” updated January 14, 2008. “The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11,” updated February 8, 2008. “Defense: […]
A federal court on Friday issued an injunction (pdf) disabling the internet domain name of Wikileaks.org, the anti-censorship web site devoted to publication of leaks and other unauthorized disclosures of information. The move followed a complaint by Bank Julius Baer, a Swiss bank, that Wikileaks had published confidential bank records that are protected by law. […]
Noteworthy new reports from the Congressional Research Service include the following (all pdf). “Congressional Oversight and Related Issues Concerning the Prospective Security Agreement Between the United States and Iraq,” February 7, 2008. “How Large is China’s Economy? Does it Matter?,” February 13, 2008. “FY2009 Appropriations for State and Local Homeland Security,” February 7, 2008. “The […]
A new report (pdf) from the JASON defense science advisory panel examines the feasibility of modeling explosive shocks to naval vessels to assess their vulnerability. “Underwater mines have long been a major threat to ships. The most probable threats are non-contact explosions, where a high pressure wave is launched towards the ship.” “During World War […]
The United States is planning to intercept a dying reconnaissance satellite with a missile launched from a Navy ship. The administration justifies the intercept on the basis of public safety. That is a long stretch, indeed, and thus far in the news coverage that I have seen there is virtually no mention of the political consequences of the United States’ conducting its first anti-satellite test in over two decades.
The United States, along with China, Russia, and other space-faring nations, should be working to ban anti-satellite weapons. Such a ban would work strongly in the best interests of the United States because we depend more, by far, than any other nation on access to space for our economy and security. Any measure that reduces the threats to satellites will enhance American security. The proposed test is a potential public relations bonanza, showing the public how a defensive missile can protect us from a—largely imaginary—danger from above. What follows is a simple analysis of what some of these dangers might be and a description of what might happen. These are questions that should have been asked of the administration.