It may be easier for litigants to mount a constitutional challenge to intelligence surveillance programs that gather U.S. data such as telephone and internet metadata now that those programs have been documented through leaks of classified records. Or, says a new report from the Congressional Research Service, it may not be.
Unlike previous cases, “the litigants in these newly filed lawsuits would appear to have a stronger argument for how they have been injured [than prior litigants did, and they] have evidence that the government is actually using its authority to gather data that is pertinent to the plaintiffs,” the CRS report said.
“However, the plaintiffs in these lawsuits may still have significant difficulties in establishing standing, as they have arguably not alleged that they have been specifically targeted by the government or injured in any concrete and particularized way by the government’s conduct,” the CRS author speculates. See Foreign Surveillance and the Future of Standing to Sue Post-Clapper, July 10, 2013.
Other new or newly updated CRS reports include the following.
Cluster Munitions: Background and Issues for Congress, July 9, 2013
Points of Order in the Congressional Budget Process, July 11, 2013
Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy, July 10, 2013
FAS experts believe government shutdowns are science shutdowns: costly and ineffective standoffs that stifle scientific pursuits and do harm.
We always knew that healthy children do better in school. Now we have rigorous empirical research to back it up.
Truly open science requires that the public is not only able to access the products of research, but the knowledge embedded within.
Over the last year we’ve devoted considerable effort to understanding wildfire in the context of U.S. federal policy. Here’s what we learned.