Govt Subpoenas ACLU to Recover Classified Document
Updated Below:
Government attorneys reached deep into their legal bag of tricks to devise a subpoena (pdf) against the American Civil Liberties Union demanding “any and all copies” of a classified document that was leaked to the ACLU in October.
Questioned by an ACLU attorney as to the authority for this demand, a government attorney cited the espionage statutes in 18 USC 793 and 798.
Such an action is unprecedented, the ACLU said in a motion to quash (pdf) the subpoena, and it is also an improper use of subpoena authority.
If successful, this tactic could be used to confiscate classified documents from news organizations, effectively imposing prior restraint on publication and curtailing freedom of the press.
“No official secrets act has yet been enacted into law, and the grand jury’s subpoena power cannot be employed to create one,” the ACLU said.
The story was covered in the New York Times here, and the Washington Post here.
The subpoena against the ACLU is the latest in a series of new government efforts to tighten controls on classified information and to punish those who disclose such information.
A recent issue of The News Media & The Law, published by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, focuses on “Journalists and the Espionage Act” and provides updates on several ongoing cases and controversies.
Update, December 18:
Government Backs Down in its Attempt to Seize “Secret” Document From ACLU
One week after the American Civil Liberties Union moved to quash an unprecedented government grand jury subpoena demanding “any and all copies” of a previously “secret” memorandum, the government today backed down from the fight, asking a judge to withdraw the subpoena and saying that the document in question has been declassified.
This rule gives agencies significantly more authority over certain career policy roles. Whether that authority improves accountability or creates new risks depends almost entirely on how agencies interrupt and apply it.
Our environmental system was built for 1970s-era pollution control, but today it needs stable, integrated, multi-level governance that can make tradeoffs, share and use evidence, and deliver infrastructure while demonstrating that improved trust and participation are essential to future progress.
Durable and legitimate climate action requires a government capable of clearly weighting, explaining, and managing cost tradeoffs to the widest away of audiences, which in turn requires strong technocratic competency.
FAS is launching the Center for Regulatory Ingenuity (CRI) to build a new, transpartisan vision of government that works – that has the capacity to achieve ambitious goals while adeptly responding to people’s basic needs.