Can the Defense Department Build a Border Wall?
If the President were to declare a national emergency in order to justify building a “wall” on the border with Mexico, there would be certain legal authorities that he could invoke to initiate construction operations.
But the scope of those legal authorities is uncertain and would almost certainly trigger litigation to challenge their application, the Congressional Research Service said last week.
“Whether these authorities — individually or in combination — extend to the construction of a border wall would present a reviewing court with several questions of first impression,” CRS said. See Can the Department of Defense Build the Border Wall?, CRS Legal Sidebar, January 10, 2019.
On the other hand, the National Emergencies Act has been effectively invoked on two previous occasions to authorize military construction activity overseas (by Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush), CRS said in another new publication. See Military Construction Funding in the Event of a National Emergency, CRS Insight, updated January 11, 2019.
Some other noteworthy new and updated publications from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
Mexico’s Immigration Control Efforts, CRS In Focus, updated January 3, 2019
How a Government Shutdown Affects Government Contracts, CRS Legal Sidebar, January 10, 2019
Defense Primer: FY2018 Department of Defense Audit Results, CRS In Focus, updated January 9, 2019
New CRS Series: Introduction to Financial Services, CRS Insight, updated January 11, 2019
Federal Grand Jury Secrecy: Legal Principles and Implications for Congressional Oversight, January 10, 2019
U.S. Sanctions on Russia, updated January 11, 2019
Cluster Munitions: Background and Issues for Congress, updated January 7, 2019
U.S.-Proposed Missile Technology Control Regime Changes, CRS In Focus, January 10, 2019
To secure the U.S. bio-infrastructure, maintain global leadership in biotechnology, and safeguard American citizens from emerging threats to their privacy, the federal government must modernize its approach to human genetic and biological data.
To ensure an energy transition that brings broad based economic development, participation, and direct benefits to communities, we need federal policy that helps shape markets. Unfortunately, there is a large gap in understanding of how to leverage federal policy making to support access to capital and credit.
From use to testing to deployment, the scaffolding for responsible integration of AI into high-risk use cases is just not there.
OPM’s new HR 2.0 initiative is entering hostile terrain. Those who have followed federal HR modernization for years desperately want this effort to succeed.