Most people are not going to read a book-length study of nuclear weapons command and control, and they shouldn’t have to. But those who need a quick sketch — whether they are reporters, students, or regular citizens — can now find a concise, two-page introduction to the topic from the Congressional Research Service. See Defense Primer: Command and Control of Nuclear Forces, CRS In Focus, December 1, 2016.
This document is part of a series of some three dozen “defense primers” that were prepared lately by CRS for new members of Congress in order to explain “key aspects of the Department of Defense and how Congress exercises authority over it.” The reports can serve the same purpose for interested members of the public.
The CRS primers naturally will not turn readers into experts. But they generally do an excellent job of presenting complex or obscure matters in clear language that almost anyone can understand, while identifying key policy issues, and introducing the essential vocabulary used to address them. The fact that CRS has no particular institutional stake in those issues enhances the credibility of the reports and makes them useful to readers of any persuasion, and to those who don’t yet know what to think.
Among the titles in the series are these:
Defense Primer: Intelligence Support to Military Operations, CRS In Focus, December 30, 2016
Defense Primer: Organization of U.S. Ground Forces, CRS In Focus, December 29, 2016
Defense Primer: Commanding U.S. Military Operations, CRS In Focus, December 13, 2016
Defense Primer: Ballistic Missile Defense, CRS In Focus, December 12, 2016
Defense Primer: Cyberspace Operations, CRS In Focus, December 8, 2016
Defense Primer: Legal Authorities for the Use of Military Forces, CRS In Focus, December 7, 2016
Defense Primer: Congress’s Constitutional Authority with Regard to the Armed Forces, CRS In Focus, December 7, 2016
Defense Primer: Budgeting for National and Defense Intelligence, CRS In Focus, December 5, 2016
Defense Primer: The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), CRS In Focus, November 16, 2016
Defense Primer: Geography, Strategy, and U.S. Force Design, CRS In Focus, October 14, 2016
Every report in the CRS defense primer series is available on the FAS website here.
January saw us watching whether the government would fund science. February has been about how that funding will be distributed, regulated, and contested.
This rule gives agencies significantly more authority over certain career policy roles. Whether that authority improves accountability or creates new risks depends almost entirely on how agencies interrupt and apply it.
Our environmental system was built for 1970s-era pollution control, but today it needs stable, integrated, multi-level governance that can make tradeoffs, share and use evidence, and deliver infrastructure while demonstrating that improved trust and participation are essential to future progress.
Durable and legitimate climate action requires a government capable of clearly weighting, explaining, and managing cost tradeoffs to the widest away of audiences, which in turn requires strong technocratic competency.