Army Directed Energy Weapons, and More from CRS
U.S. Army efforts to develop directed energy weapons — such as lasers and microwave weapons — are surveyed in a new report from the Congressional Research Service.
Such weapons are probably years away from actual deployment by the Army, if indeed they ever become practical options.
“While DE weapons offer a variety of advantages over conventional kinetic weapons including precision, low cost per shot, and scalable effects, there are also some basic constraints such as beam attenuation, limited range, and an inability to be employed against non-line-of-sight targets which will need to be addressed in order to make these weapons effective across the entire spectrum of combat operations,” the CRS report said.
The status of some directed energy programs is obscured by secrecy, CRS said. “The classified nature of most of DOD’s HPM [high-power microwave] programs… makes public and academic examination of these programs problematic.”
The first DoD laser weapon ever to be approved for operational use was deployed aboard the USS Ponce (now decommissioned), according to the U.S. Navy.
See U.S. Army Weapons-Related Directed Energy (DE) Programs: Background and Potential Issues for Congress by Andrew Feickert, February 7, 2018.
Other new and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
Egypt: Background and U.S. Relations, February 8, 2018
Iran: Politics, Human Rights, and U.S. Policy, February 8, 2018
Yemen: Civil War and Regional Intervention, February 7, 2018
Rwanda: In Brief, February 7, 2018
The 10-20-30 Plan and Persistent Poverty Counties, February 8, 2018
Medicare Trigger, February 8, 2018
Women in Congress, 1917-2018: Service Dates and Committee Assignments by Member, and Lists by State and Congress, February 6, 2018
Federal Spending on Benefits and Services for People with Low Income: In Brief, February 6, 2018
Introduction to U.S. Economy: The Business Cycle and Growth, CRS In Focus, December 13, 2017
This rule gives agencies significantly more authority over certain career policy roles. Whether that authority improves accountability or creates new risks depends almost entirely on how agencies interrupt and apply it.
Our environmental system was built for 1970s-era pollution control, but today it needs stable, integrated, multi-level governance that can make tradeoffs, share and use evidence, and deliver infrastructure while demonstrating that improved trust and participation are essential to future progress.
Durable and legitimate climate action requires a government capable of clearly weighting, explaining, and managing cost tradeoffs to the widest away of audiences, which in turn requires strong technocratic competency.
FAS is launching the Center for Regulatory Ingenuity (CRI) to build a new, transpartisan vision of government that works – that has the capacity to achieve ambitious goals while adeptly responding to people’s basic needs.