Presidential Authority Over Trade, & More from CRS
The Trump transition team has promised vaguely that the incoming Administration will deliver “a seismic and transformative shift in trade policy.”
But executive authority over trade policy exists within a framework of law, as a new report from the Congressional Research Service explains, and there are legal limits to what the President can do.
“The United States Constitution gives Congress the power to impose and collect taxes, tariffs, duties, and the like, and to regulate international commerce. While the Constitution gives the President authority to negotiate international agreements, it assigns him no specific power over international commerce and trade.”
“Through legislation, however, Congress may delegate some of its power to the President, such as the power to modify tariffs under certain circumstances. Thus, because the President does not possess express constitutional authority to modify tariffs, he must find authority for tariff-related action in statute.” See Presidential Authority over Trade: Imposing Tariffs and Duties, December 9, 2016.
Other new and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
The Federal Budget Deficit and the Business Cycle, CRS Insight, December 9, 2016
“Fiscal Space” and the Federal Budget, CRS Insight, December 9, 2016
Creating a Federal Advisory Committee in the Executive Branch, updated December 9, 2016
Changing the Senate Cloture Rule at the Start of a New Congress, December 12, 2016
Qatar: Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy, December 9, 2016
Commercial Space Industry Launches a New Phase, December 12, 2016
Password Sharing May Be a Federal Crime: Nosal Part I (and II), CRS Legal Sidebar, December 9, 2016
After months of delay, the council tasked by President Trump to review the FEMA released its final report. Our disaster policy nerds have thoughts.
FAS and FLI partnered to build a series of convenings and reports across the intersections of artificial intelligence (AI) with biosecurity, cybersecurity, nuclear command and control, military integration, and frontier AI governance. This project brought together leaders across these areas and created a space that was rigorous, transpartisan, and solutions-oriented to approach how we should think about how AI is rapidly changing global risks.
Investment should instead be directed at sectors where American technology and innovation exist but the infrastructure to commercialize them domestically does not—and where the national security case is clear.
To tune into the action on the ground, we convened practitioners, state and local officials, advocates, and policy experts to discuss what it will actually take to deploy clean energy faster, modernize electricity systems, and lower costs for households.