We hope that all Secrecy News readers will give generously to charitable causes that help relieve those who are in distress, near and far.
But if you have something left over and you find our work interesting or useful for your own purposes, then we hope you may also contribute to Secrecy News and the FAS Project on Government Secrecy.
If your situation permits, please consider making a tax deductible contribution to the Federation of American Scientists to support Secrecy News. (Thanks to those who have already done so!)
Donations can be made online (specify that your donation should be directed to “government secrecy”). If contributing via Paypal or CFC (account number 11539), send us a separate email to let us know you want your contribution allocated to the FAS Project on Government Secrecy. Checks payable to FAS may also be mailed to:
Secrecy News
Federation of American Scientists
1725 DeSales Street N.W.
6th Floor
Washington D.C. 20036
There is no question this is a Big Deal. If you are a university or research lab, or aspire to work in one, or are simply an enthusiast of federally-funded research, what’s next will matter.
The emerging federal metascience community is asking fascinating questions that are equally vital for democratic legitimacy: beyond “did this program work” to “how does the federal R&D enterprise itself work, and how could it work better?”
If you’re new to the climate intervention space, welcome! The TL;DR: if we can’t stop the most catastrophic impacts of climate change with current tools quickly enough, then we need a bigger toolbox.
After months of delay, the council tasked by President Trump to review the FEMA released its final report. Our disaster policy nerds have thoughts.