A new report from the Senate Judiciary Committee examines the use of the state secrets privilege by the executive branch and describes the intent of new legislation to strengthen judicial review of its use in civil litigation.
The 53 page report summarizes the latest legal scholarship on the state secrets privilege, as well as the controversy that has surrounded it.
“In recent years, the executive branch has asserted the privilege more frequently and broadly than before, typically to seek dismissal of lawsuits at the pleadings stage. Facing allegations of unlawful Government conduct ranging from domestic warrantless surveillance, to employment discrimination, to retaliation against whistleblowers, to torture and ‘extraordinary rendition,’ the Bush-Cheney administration has invoked the privilege in an effort to shut down civil suits against both Government officials and private parties. Courts have largely acquiesced,” the report states.
“While there is some debate over the extent to which this represents a quantitative or qualitative break from past practice, ‘[w]hat is undebatable … is that the privilege is currently being invoked as grounds for dismissal of entire categories of cases challenging the constitutionality of Government action,’ and that a strong public perception has emerged that sees the privilege as a tool for Executive abuse.”
“In response to the growing concerns about the state secrets privilege, Senator Kennedy, Senator Specter, and Senator Leahy introduced the State Secrets Protection Act to provide a systematic approach to the privilege and thereby bring stability, predictability, and clarity to this area of the law and restore the public trust in Government and the courts.”
The new report includes dissenting views from several Republican members of the Judiciary Committee, who argue that the existing arrangements already strike the “right balance between openness, justice and national security.” See “State Secrets Protection Act,” Senate Judiciary Committee Report 110-442, August 1.
Another new report from the Senate Judiciary Committee addresses court-ordered secrecy, and would limit judicial authority to seal court records pertaining to public health and safety. The report describes pending legislation that “requires judges to consider the public’s interest in disclosure of health and safety information before issuing a protective order or an order to seal court records or a settlement agreement.” See “Sunshine in Litigation Act,” Senate Judiciary Committee Report 110-439, August 1.
To empower new voices to start their career in nuclear weapons studies, the Federation of American Scientists launched the New Voices on Nuclear Weapons Fellowship. Here’s what our inaugural cohort accomplished.
Common frameworks for evaluating proposals leave this utility function implicit, often evaluating aspects of risk, uncertainty, and potential value independently and qualitatively.
The FAS Nuclear Notebook is one of the most widely sourced reference materials worldwide for reliable information about the status of nuclear weapons and has been published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists since 1987. The Nuclear Notebook is researched and written by the staff of the Federation of American Scientists’ Nuclear Information Project: Director Hans […]
According to the National Center for Education Statistics’ August 2023 pulse panel, 60% of public schools were utilizing a “community school” or “wraparound services model” at the start of this school year—up from 45% last year.