Reports of the Congressional Research Service are predicated on the belief that readers in Congress or elsewhere care about the minutia of government policy. But if this was ever true, is it still the case today?
The members of CRS’s presumed target audience have not yet made up their minds about any number of issues, and they eagerly look forward to weighing the competing arguments pro and con. Are there such people?
To Congress, CRS reports must be treated as a controlled substance. CRS is literally prohibited from making them directly available to the public. If anybody were able to get their hands on them, who knows what might happen?
Let’s find out. New and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service that have been withheld from public distribution in the last few days include the following.
How Much Slack Remains in the Labor Market?, CRS Insight, August 5, 2016
Clean Power Plan: Legal Background and Pending Litigation in West Virginia v. EPA, updated August 8, 2016
Automakers Seek to Align Fuel Economy and Greenhouse Gas Regulations, CRS Insight, August 8, 2016
Al Qaeda’s Syria Affiliate Declares Independence, CRS Insight, August 5, 2016
Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress, updated August 8, 2016
FAS experts believe government shutdowns are science shutdowns: costly and ineffective standoffs that stifle scientific pursuits and do harm.
We always knew that healthy children do better in school. Now we have rigorous empirical research to back it up.
Truly open science requires that the public is not only able to access the products of research, but the knowledge embedded within.
Over the last year we’ve devoted considerable effort to understanding wildfire in the context of U.S. federal policy. Here’s what we learned.