The process of declassifying national security records, which is hardly expeditious under the best of circumstances, will become slower as a result of the mandatory budget cuts known as sequestration.
Due to sequestration, “NARA has reduced funding dedicated to the declassification of Presidential records,” the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) said in a report last week.
“Instead, NARA staff will prepare documents for declassification, in addition to their existing duties. This will slow declassification processes and delay other work, including FOIA responses and special access requests,” said the new report, which also identified several other adverse effects of the across-the-board cuts.
Meanwhile, because of the basic asymmetry between classification and declassification, there is no particular reason to expect a corresponding reduction in the rate at which new records are classified.
Classification is an integral part of the production of new national security information that cannot be deferred, while declassification is a distinct process that can easily be put on hold. Likewise, there is no dedicated budget for “classification” to cut in the way that NARA has cut declassification spending. And while Congress has erected barriers to declassification (such as the Kyl-Lott Amendment to prohibit automatic declassification of records without review), it has simultaneously allowed declassification requirements to go overlooked and unenforced.
Some declassification is actually mandated by law. A 1991 statute on the Foreign Relations of the United States series requires the Department of State to publish a “thorough, accurate, and reliable documentary record of major United States foreign policy decisions” no later than 30 years after the fact, necessitating the timely declassification of the underlying records. But law or no law, the government has not complied with this publication schedule.
The transition to a clean energy future and diversified sources of energy requires a fundamental shift in how we produce and consume energy across all sectors of the U.S. economy.
A deeper understanding of methane could help scientists better address these impacts – including potentially through methane removal.
While it is reasonable for governments to keep the most sensitive aspects of nuclear policies secret, the rights of their citizens to have access to general knowledge about these issues is equally valid so they may know about the consequences to themselves and their country.
Advancing the U.S. leadership in emerging biotechnology is a strategic imperative, one that will shape regional development within the U.S., economic competitiveness abroad, and our national security for decades to come.