Kyl Amendment on Leaks is Withdrawn, Amended, Reintroduced
A sweeping proposal by Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) to criminalize the unauthorized disclosure or publication of classified information about U.S. Government activities relating to terrorism was abruptly withdrawn on February 28 in the face of vigorous protests by public interest, press and First Amendment advocacy groups.
But then a modified, more narrowly focused version was reintroduced on the Senate floor on March 2 as an amendment to S.4, the pending bill on enacting the remaining recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.
The new Kyl amendment (pdf) would penalize employees of the House or Senate or other authorized personnel who knowingly disclose classified information that is contained in a report to Congress.
“Singling out employees of Congress for criminal sanctions would be virtually unprecedented,” said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies.
It also “raises serious separation of powers concerns,” she said, since classification criteria and practices are dictated by the executive branch. “And it would demonstrate a lack of confidence by the Congress that it can police its own house.”
Ask people what worries them most right now, and they’ll say the cost of living and their livelihoods, not climate change. But those concerns are not separate.
After a year-long delay, this April, EPA released the latest air toxics data, which only included raw air data downloads. This year, for the first time in nearly 25 years, the air toxics data did not include cancer risk estimates.
In the current environment of declining trust and magnifying strategic competition, banning debris-creating tests is a concrete step towards stability that favors interests of all states seeking to conduct space activities.
Often negotiations between data center developers and local officials are conducted behind closed doors, protected by NDAs. How can we have an informed debate, when we don’t know what’s on the table?