Intel Community Moves Towards Performance-Based Pay
The Director of National Intelligence last week issued several new Intelligence Community Directives (ICDs) that implement new community-wide personnel practices, including a performance-based compensation policy that rewards superior job performance.
The new payment policy “links performance-based pay increases and bonuses to individual accomplishments, demonstrated competencies, and contributions to organizational results.”
“Higher performance and greater contribution to mission should result in proportionally higher rewards for similarly-situated employees.”
The new payment and personnel policies, part of DNI J. Michael McConnell’s 100-day and 500-day plans, are intended to modernize the business practices of U.S. intelligence agencies and, implicitly, to make government service somewhat more competitive with intelligence contractors in the private sector.
The new personnel policies will also replace the standard government personnel grading system known as the General Schedule (GS) for all intelligence agency employees, except that senior officials at the GS-15 or higher grade are exempted.
The new IC Directives, all dated April 28, 2008, were released under the Freedom of Information Act. They include:
ICD 650, National Intelligence Civilian Compensation Program: Guiding Principles and Framework (pdf)
ICD 652, Occupational Structure for the Intelligence Community Civilian Workforce (pdf)
ICD 654, Performance-Based Pay for the Intelligence Community Civilian Workforce (pdf)
ICD 656, Performance Management System Requirements for Intelligence Community Senior Civilian Officers (pdf)
Copies of these and other IC Directives are available here.
After months of delay, the council tasked by President Trump to review the FEMA released its final report. Our disaster policy nerds have thoughts.
FAS and FLI partnered to build a series of convenings and reports across the intersections of artificial intelligence (AI) with biosecurity, cybersecurity, nuclear command and control, military integration, and frontier AI governance. This project brought together leaders across these areas and created a space that was rigorous, transpartisan, and solutions-oriented to approach how we should think about how AI is rapidly changing global risks.
Investment should instead be directed at sectors where American technology and innovation exist but the infrastructure to commercialize them domestically does not—and where the national security case is clear.
To tune into the action on the ground, we convened practitioners, state and local officials, advocates, and policy experts to discuss what it will actually take to deploy clean energy faster, modernize electricity systems, and lower costs for households.