Congressional leaders who are investigating the refusal of Vice President Cheney to comply with executive branch procedures for oversight of classification and declassification activity yesterday asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (pdf) to account for his sluggish handling of the issue.
Last January, J. William Leonard, the director of the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), asked the Attorney General to determine whether the Office of the Vice President is subject to reporting requirements like other executive branch agencies, or not.
A reply is not optional. The executive order states clearly that “The Attorney General, upon request…, shall render an interpretation of this order with respect to any question arising in the course of its administration” (sec. 6.2b).
Yet no such reply has been forthcoming.
“Due to conflicting statements from your department, the status of your review of this matter is unclear,” wrote Reps. Henry Waxman, John Conyers Jr., and William Lacy Clay in their letter to the Attorney General. “More than six months (sic) have passed since Mr. Leonard’s letter to you, and the Information Security Oversight Office has received no response to its inquiry.”
The House letter asked Attorney General Gonzales to reply to a series of questions regarding his review of the Vice President’s status as a classifier.
The Congressmen cited a Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel reply (pdf) to a Freedom of Information Act request from the Federation of American Scientists (first reported by Michael Isikoff in Newsweek this week) indicating that “no documents” had been generated in response to the ISOO inquiry.
On the Senate floor yesterday, Sen. Patrick Leahy extolled the FAS request as a example of the utility of the Freedom of Information Act.
“Just this week, we witnessed the great value of FOIA in shedding light on a controversial policy within the Office of the Vice President regarding the handling of classified information, with news reports that a FOIA request to the Justice Department first revealed that the Attorney General may have delayed a review into the legality of this troubling policy,” Sen. Leahy said in a June 27 statement on the status of the Open Government Act, which has been held up by opposition from a Republican Senator.
In a June 25 letter (pdf), Sen. Dick Durbin asked the Vice President to comply with the requirements of the Executive Order “so that we will not be compelled to take corrective action in our appropriations bill.”
A deeper understanding of methane could help scientists better address these impacts – including potentially through methane removal.
While it is reasonable for governments to keep the most sensitive aspects of nuclear policies secret, the rights of their citizens to have access to general knowledge about these issues is equally valid so they may know about the consequences to themselves and their country.
Advancing the U.S. leadership in emerging biotechnology is a strategic imperative, one that will shape regional development within the U.S., economic competitiveness abroad, and our national security for decades to come.
Inconsistent metrics and opaque reporting make future AI power‑demand estimates extremely uncertain, leaving grid planners in the dark and climate targets on the line