There is widespread dissatisfaction with the organization and performance of the Department of Defense, a new Congressional Research Service report says, but no consensus on what to do about it.
Driving the current debate, CRS says, are questions such as:
* “Why, after the expenditure of nearly $1.6 trillion and over 15 years at war in Iraq and Afghanistan, has the United States had such difficulty translating tactical and operational victories into sustainable political outcomes?”
* “Why, despite the expenditure of over $600 billion per year on defense, is the readiness of the force approaching critically low levels, according to military officials, while the number of platforms and capabilities being produced are generally short of perceived requirements?”
* “Why, despite tactical and operational adaptations around the world, is DOD often seen as having difficulty formulating strategies and policies in sufficient time to adapt to and meet the increasingly dynamic threat environment?”
“Taken together, […] the issues raised by these questions suggest the systemic nature of the challenges with which the Department of Defense appears to be grappling. In other words, they suggest that DOD’s organizational architecture and culture may merit serious review and analysis.”
“This report is intended to assist Congress as it evaluates the variety of reform proposals currently under discussion.” See Goldwater-Nichols at 30: Defense Reform and Issues for Congress, April 20, 2016.
Other new and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service that Congress has withheld from online public disclosure include the following.
Defense Authorization and Appropriations Bills: FY1970-FY2016, updated April 20, 2016
The World Drug Problem: UNGA Convenes for a Special Session, CRS Insight, April 20, 2016
Climate Change Paris Agreement Opens for Signature, CRS Insight, April 20, 2016
Negative Interest Rates, CRS Insight, April 20, 2016
EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa, April 22, 2016
Department of Education Funding: Key Concepts and FAQ, April 22, 2016
Health Care for Veterans: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, April 21, 2016
Libya: Transition and U.S. Policy, updated April 20, 2016
Saudi Arabia: Background and U.S. Relations, updated April 22, 2016
Protection of Trade Secrets: Overview of Current Law and Legislation, updated April 22, 2016
To empower new voices to start their career in nuclear weapons studies, the Federation of American Scientists launched the New Voices on Nuclear Weapons Fellowship. Here’s what our inaugural cohort accomplished.
Common frameworks for evaluating proposals leave this utility function implicit, often evaluating aspects of risk, uncertainty, and potential value independently and qualitatively.
The FAS Nuclear Notebook is one of the most widely sourced reference materials worldwide for reliable information about the status of nuclear weapons and has been published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists since 1987. The Nuclear Notebook is researched and written by the staff of the Federation of American Scientists’ Nuclear Information Project: Director Hans […]
According to the National Center for Education Statistics’ August 2023 pulse panel, 60% of public schools were utilizing a “community school” or “wraparound services model” at the start of this school year—up from 45% last year.