A major new report from the National Research Council warns of future
biological threats and urges increased attention to mechanisms for
prevention, detection, mitigation and response to the destructive
use of biological agents.
But secrecy is not one of those mechanisms, the report says.
“In general, restrictive regulations and the imposition of
constraints on the flow of information are not likely to reduce the
risks that advances in the life sciences will be utilized with
malevolent intent in the future.”
“In fact, they will make it more difficult for civil society to
protect itself against such threats and ultimately are likely to
weaken national and human security.”
“The Committee endorses and affirms policies and practices that, to
the maximum extent possible, promote the free and open exchange of
information in the life sciences,” the report’s first recommendation
states.
The report contains some valuable extended discussion of information
policy in the context of biosecurity (esp. pp. 163-171).
See this January 31 news release for “Globalization, Biosecurity, and
the Future of the Life Sciences.”
Providing access to information should be shared with responsible civil society. Our nations security does indeed depend on the sharing of accurate information from the intelligence community to the appropriate authorities, in order to coordinate the appropriate response. This approach would be the appropriate one to ensure our nations security. OUR NATION IS NOT COMPRISED ONLY OF UPPER ECHELON! Caution should always be practiced where the depth of information would probably be the error in judgement. Primary focus would be upon the appropriate response to the given biological threat. The assistance from the appropriate life sciences would only assist in the solving of these difficult tasks.