The United States continued to lead global trade in conventional armaments last year, according to a newly updated report from the Congressional Research Service, but overall trade declined from the year before.
“Worldwide weapons orders decreased in 2015. The total of $79.8 billion was a decrease from $89 billion in 2014. The United States’ worldwide weapons agreements values increased in value from $36.1 billion in 2014 to $40.2 billion in 2015. The U.S. market share increased greatly as well, from roughly 40.5% in 2014 to 50.3% in 2015. Although the United States retained its position as the leading arms supplying nation in the world, nearly all other major suppliers saw increases too.”
The CRS report is based on access to unclassified but unpublished government databases. As such, the 72-page document provides a uniquely informative view of the global arms trade. See Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 2008-2015, December 19, 2016.
Other new and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
Defense Acquisitions: How and Where DOD Spends Its Contracting Dollars, updated December 20, 2016
U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians, updated December 16, 2016
Tribal Broadband: Status of Deployment and Federal Funding Programs, updated December 20, 2016
The Federal Food Safety System: A Primer, updated December 16, 2016
State Management of Federal Lands: Frequently Asked Questions, updated December 16, 2016
The FCC’s Rules and Policies Regarding Media Ownership, Attribution, and Ownership Diversity, updated December 16, 2016
Special Minimum Wages for Workers with Disabilities: Frequently Asked Questions, updated December 16, 2016
Discretionary Budget Authority by Subfunction: An Overview, updated December 16, 2016
Restrictions on Lobbying the Government: Current Policy and Proposed Changes, CRS Insight, December 15, 2016
U.S. Policy on Cuban Migrants: In Brief, December 16, 2016
The African Union (AU): Key Issues and U.S.-AU Relations, December 16, 2016
We’ve created a tool to monitor the progress of federal actions on extreme heat, enhance accountability, and to allow stakeholders to stay informed on the evolving state of U.S. climate-change resilience.
Wickerson was a few years into their doctoral work in material science and engineering at Northwestern University when the prospect of writing a policy memo with FAS cropped up at a virtual conference.
Federal investment in STEM education/workforce development, though significant, can hardly be described as a generational response to an economic and national security crisis.
In the absence of a national strategy to address the compounding impacts of extreme heat, states, counties, and cities have had to take on the responsibility of addressing the reality of extreme heat in their communities with limited resources.