The AI x Global Risk Nexus Project assesses the risks associated with integrating and Artificial Intelligence into existing areas of global risk.
Mismatches between the tools we need and the tools we have are particularly apparent in the environmental space. There is a need for creativity and cleverness in how we approach environmental and other types of regulation.
Despite progress in reducing nuclear weapon arsenals since the Cold War, the world’s combined inventory of nuclear warheads remains at a very high level.
The FDA can better leverage Advisory Committee membership through expanding the role of the chair, overall committee composition, implementing mandatory training programs, and streamlining the conflict of interest process.
Massive inequities persist for students and workers alike in accessing the learning opportunities and pathways that would allow them to access STEM training and careers.
The federal government plays a critical role in correcting bias in technologies and incentivizing future processes for equitable innovation.
Improving American competitiveness, security, and prosperity depends on the ability to responsibly site, build, and deploy proposed critical energy, infrastructure, and environmental restoration projects.
We are working with development experts to identify a set of cost-effective interventions and pathways to scale within USAID and other federal programs.
Current high-skilled immigration policies are limiting the inflow of foreign talent, exacerbating shortages and reducing America’s ability to innovate and retain its competitive edge.
We engage with the public, academia, and the private sector to foster a broader understanding of AI and emerging technology policy issues.
While state and local governments can make significant advances, national extreme heat resilience requires a “whole of government” federal approach.
We’re helping to develop more effective hiring pathways, innovative research and development practices, and faster deployment of new energy technologies.