An Eight-Member Supreme Court, and More from CRS
A new report from the Congressional Research Service examines the implications of having only eight members on the Supreme Court following Justice Scalia’s death.
“This report provides an overview of the Supreme Court’s procedural rules and requirements when the Court is staffed with less than nine members. Included in this discussion is an overview of the Court’s quorum requirements, rehearing procedures, and vote count practices, with a focus on how the Court has traditionally responded to a change of composition during a term. The report concludes by highlighting over a dozen cases from the current term that could result in an evenly divided Supreme Court.”
See The Death of Justice Scalia: Procedural Issues Arising on an Eight-Member Supreme Court, February 25, 2016.
Other new and updated CRS reports that were published (but not publicly released) in the past week include the following.
DOD Releases Plan to Close GTMO, CRS Legal Sidebar, February 23, 2016
The United Kingdom and the European Union: Stay or Go?, CRS Insight, February 24, 2016
Court-Ordered Access to Smart Phones: In Brief, February 23, 2016
Health Care for Veterans: Suicide Prevention, updated February 23, 2016
Prescription Drug Abuse, February 23, 2016
Overview of Labor Enforcement Issues in Free Trade Agreements, updated February 22, 2016
Senators’ Official Personnel and Office Expense Account (SOPOEA): History and Usage, February 25, 2016
U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices, updated February 25, 2016
The 2015 National Security Strategy: Authorities, Changes, Issues for Congress, updated February 26, 2016
Ukraine: Current Issues and U.S. Policy, updated February 22, 2016
Federal Court Declines to Bar the Resettlement of Syrian Refugees in Texas, CRS Legal Sidebar, February 26, 2016
Iraqi and Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Programs, updated February 26, 2016
Iran-North Korea-Syria Ballistic Missile and Nuclear Cooperation, updated February 26, 2016
This rule gives agencies significantly more authority over certain career policy roles. Whether that authority improves accountability or creates new risks depends almost entirely on how agencies interrupt and apply it.
Our environmental system was built for 1970s-era pollution control, but today it needs stable, integrated, multi-level governance that can make tradeoffs, share and use evidence, and deliver infrastructure while demonstrating that improved trust and participation are essential to future progress.
Durable and legitimate climate action requires a government capable of clearly weighting, explaining, and managing cost tradeoffs to the widest away of audiences, which in turn requires strong technocratic competency.
FAS is launching the Center for Regulatory Ingenuity (CRI) to build a new, transpartisan vision of government that works – that has the capacity to achieve ambitious goals while adeptly responding to people’s basic needs.