A Reporter’s Privilege Workaround, and More from CRS
New and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Supplements Journalist Privilege, CRS Legal Sidebar, October 20, 2015
Supreme Court Appointment Process: President’s Selection of a Nominee, October 19, 2015
Supreme Court Appointment Process: Consideration by the Senate Judiciary Committee, October 19, 2015
Supreme Court Appointment Process: Senate Debate and Confirmation Vote, October 19, 2015
Points of Order in the Congressional Budget Process, updated October 20, 2015
Creating a Federal Advisory Committee in the Executive Branch, October 19, 2015
Legislative Branch Agency Appointments: History, Processes, and Recent Actions, updated October 19, 2015
Federal Aid for Reconstruction of Houses of Worship: A Legal Analysis, October 19, 2015
Sanctuary Jurisdictions and Criminal Aliens: In Brief, October 20, 2015
Elections in Haiti, CRS Insight, October 20, 2015
Argentina’s 2015 Presidential Election, CRS Insight, October 20, 2015
U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation Following “El Chapo” Guzmán’s Escape, CRS Insights, updated October 20, 2015
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Tehran’s Compliance with International Obligations, updated October 19, 2015
U.S. Foreign Assistance to the Middle East: Historical Background, Recent Trends, and the FY2016 Request, October 19, 2015
* * *
The ready availability of most CRS reports online in recent years has demonstrated at least a couple of things.
First, they are actually useful. And they are used — by reporters, researchers and members of the general public. Every day, news stories and editorials cite to CRS publications as authoritative sources of non-partisan information.
Second, their broad public dissemination online has generated no adverse effects on CRS as an institution. In particular, it has not interfered with analysts’ productivity or candor, or with the conduct of congressional operations.
But authorized disclosure of CRS reports would be greatly preferable to the existing practice of unauthorized disclosure. The unauthorized route involves time-consuming collection and processing activity by people whose efforts could perhaps be applied more productively in other ways. And while the public archive of current CRS reports is probably more than 80% complete, it is not 100% complete.
A new initiative to gain authorized public access to CRS reports is now getting some traction. The issue is being addressed today on Capitol Hill at a meeting of the Congressional Transparency Caucus.
Numerous former CRS experts and analysts have written to congressional leaders to express their support for public access.
And a bipartisan resolution in favor of public access has been introduced in the House by Reps. Mike Quigley (D-IL) and Leonard Lance (R-NJ).
It may yet happen.
This rule gives agencies significantly more authority over certain career policy roles. Whether that authority improves accountability or creates new risks depends almost entirely on how agencies interrupt and apply it.
Our environmental system was built for 1970s-era pollution control, but today it needs stable, integrated, multi-level governance that can make tradeoffs, share and use evidence, and deliver infrastructure while demonstrating that improved trust and participation are essential to future progress.
Durable and legitimate climate action requires a government capable of clearly weighting, explaining, and managing cost tradeoffs to the widest away of audiences, which in turn requires strong technocratic competency.
FAS is launching the Center for Regulatory Ingenuity (CRI) to build a new, transpartisan vision of government that works – that has the capacity to achieve ambitious goals while adeptly responding to people’s basic needs.