Judge Sotomayor: A CRS Analysis of Selected Opinions
More than anything else, Judge Sonia Sotomayor is a judicial conservative who has hewed closely to established precedent, according to a new analysis by the Congressional Research Service of appellate court decisions authored by President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court.
“Perhaps the most consistent characteristic of Judge Sotomayor’s approach as an appellate judge has been an adherence to the doctrine of stare decisis, i.e., the upholding of past judicial precedents,” the 59-page CRS report (pdf) stated.
In several important areas, however, the Judge’s conception of the law remains opaque. For example, “An examination of Judge Sotomayor’s opinions provides little guidance as to her judicial philosophy regarding executive authority in the realm of national security,” the report said.
Judge Sotomayor authored two opinions involving the Freedom of Information Act. But “because the opinions are few and relied on relevant Supreme Court precedent, it is difficult to draw conclusions from them regarding her overall approach to FOIA or to related matters such as individual privacy or transparency in government,” the CRS concluded. See “Judge Sonia Sotomayor: Analysis of Selected Opinions,” June 19, 2009.
Other noteworthy new CRS reports obtained by Secrecy News include the following (all pdf):
“Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789-2009,” updated June 5, 2009.
“Inherently Governmental Functions and Department of Defense Operations: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress,” June 22, 2009.
“Federal Rulemaking: The Role of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,” June 9, 2009.
“Homeland Security Department: FY2010 Request for Appropriations,” June 15, 2009.
“Iran’s 2009 Presidential Elections,” June 22, 2009.
These ideas aim to advance the detailed policy solutions needed to foster public trust and implement fairness in the adoption of AI across diverse domains, from healthcare and government benefits to rural access, education, and worker protections.
The evidence is clear: algorithmic pay-setting is established in app-based work, and payroll/timekeeping failures show how software can produce systemic wage harm at scale
While a few states have taken steps to implement decision-making mechanisms for certain AI systems, too many leaders are simply accepting narratives about AI’s purported public benefit at face value – jumping to the “how” of AI implementation before thoroughly vetting potential systems and deciding whether they are appropriate to use at all.
When properly structured — with specific numeric targets, secured financial obligations, independent monitoring, and meaningful enforcement — CBAs transform data center deals into durable community partnerships.