Active Protection for Combat Vehicles, & More from CRS
Efforts to develop Active Protection Systems (APS) to defend military combat vehicles against rocket-propelled grenades or anti-tank missiles are reviewed in a new report from the Congressional Research Service.
An Active Protection System is supposed to detect an incoming threat, such as a grenade or a missile, and employ countermeasures to destroy or deflect it, all within a very brief period of time.
“A number of nations have operationally deployed APS on combat vehicles — Russia and Israel most notably — and some experts characterize U.S. efforts as somewhat lagging,” the CRS report said. “U.S. military officials contend there are still a number of developmental and safety challenges that must be overcome before current APS systems are suitable for battlefield deployment.”
See Army and Marine Corps Active Protection System (APS) Efforts, August 23, 2016.
Other new and updated Congressional Research Service reports that have not been publicly released include the following.
Stealing Trade Secrets and Economic Espionage: An Overview of the Economic Espionage Act, updated August 19, 2016
The Zika Outbreak Is Declared a Public Health Emergency in Puerto Rico, CRS Insight, August 17, 2016
Organization of American States: Background and Issues for Congress, updated August 22, 2016
U.S. Trade with Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Partners, updated August 18, 2016
Fact Sheet: Selected Highlights of the FY2017 Military Construction Appropriations Bills, August 18, 2016
Navy John Lewis (TAO-205) Class Oiler Shipbuilding Program: Background and Issues for Congress, updated August 18, 2016
Navy Columbia Class (Ohio Replacement) Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN[X]) Program: Background and Issues for Congress, updated August 18, 2016
Taxation of U.S. Olympic Medal Winners, CRS Insight, August 18, 2016
How Treasury Issues Debt, updated August 18, 2016
Overview of CEQ Guidance on Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change, CRS Insight, August 18, 2016
Iran: Politics, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy, updated August 19, 2016
Presidential Appointee Positions Requiring Senate Confirmation and Committees Handling Nominations, updated August 23, 2016
Americans are paying too much for almost everything, because the United States has long treated its trucking industry as an artifact to be preserved rather than as an opportunity for innovation.
These ideas aim to advance the detailed policy solutions needed to foster public trust and implement fairness in the adoption of AI across diverse domains, from healthcare and government benefits to rural access, education, and worker protections.
The evidence is clear: algorithmic pay-setting is established in app-based work, and payroll/timekeeping failures show how software can produce systemic wage harm at scale
While a few states have taken steps to implement decision-making mechanisms for certain AI systems, too many leaders are simply accepting narratives about AI’s purported public benefit at face value – jumping to the “how” of AI implementation before thoroughly vetting potential systems and deciding whether they are appropriate to use at all.