What is National Security “Partnership”? And More from CRS
New and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service that Congress has not made publicly available include the following.
In Brief: Clarifying the Concept of “Partnership” in National Security, May 4, 2012
U.S. Nuclear Cooperation With India: Issues for Congress, May 7, 2012
Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress, May 4, 2012
U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage, May 3, 2012
Interest Rates on Subsidized Stafford Loans to Undergraduate Students, May 4, 2012
Racial Profiling: Legal and Constitutional Issues, April 16, 2012
Trade Primer: Qs and As on Trade Concepts, Performance, and Policy, April 16, 2012
Judicial Activity Concerning Enemy Combatant Detainees: Major Court Rulings, April 6, 2012
After months of delay, the council tasked by President Trump to review the FEMA released its final report. Our disaster policy nerds have thoughts.
FAS and FLI partnered to build a series of convenings and reports across the intersections of artificial intelligence (AI) with biosecurity, cybersecurity, nuclear command and control, military integration, and frontier AI governance. This project brought together leaders across these areas and created a space that was rigorous, transpartisan, and solutions-oriented to approach how we should think about how AI is rapidly changing global risks.
Investment should instead be directed at sectors where American technology and innovation exist but the infrastructure to commercialize them domestically does not—and where the national security case is clear.
AI is already consequential, but its future trajectory remains contested. Policymakers should make their assumptions explicit, focus on what can be shaped rather than what can be perfectly predicted, and build institutions that can learn and respond as evidence changes.