Defense Primers, Costs of War, and More from CRS
Several short introductions to basic aspects of U.S. military policy have recently been updated by the Congressional Research Service. Intended for congressional consumers, they may also be useful to others.
Defense Primer: Organization of U.S. Ground Forces, CRS In Focus, updated November 16, 2018
Defense Primer: Special Operations Forces, CRS In Focus, updated November 16, 2018
Defense Primer: Navigating the NDAA, CRS In Focus, updated November 16, 2018
Defense Primer: Defense Appropriations Process, CRS In Focus, updated November 16, 2018
Defense Primer: Department of the Army and Army Command Structure, CRS In Focus, updated November 16, 2018
* * *
It is hard even for attentive members of the public to fully comprehend the U.S. military budget.
“The scale of spending alone makes it hard to grasp. Public understanding of the costs of war is further limited by secrecy, faulty accounting, and the deferral of current costs,” I argued recently in a short paper for the Costs of War Project at Brown University. See The Costs of War: Obstacles to Public Understanding, November 14, 2018.
Neta C. Crawford of Brown University estimated the post-9/11 costs of war at $5.9 trillion through FY 2019.
* * *
Other noteworthy new releases from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
The Global Research and Development Landscape and Implications for the Department of Defense, updated November 8, 2018
U.S. Ground Forces Robotics and Autonomous Systems (RAS) and Artificial Intelligence (AI): Considerations for Congress, updated November 20, 2018
United States and Saudi Arabia Energy Relations, CRS In Focus, November 19, 2018
Global Human Rights: Multilateral Bodies & U.S. Participation, CRS In Focus, updated November 23, 2018
The European Union: Current Challenges and Future Prospects, updated November 15, 2018
Immigration: “Recalcitrant” Countries and the Use of Visa Sanctions to Encourage Cooperation with Alien Removals, CRS In Focus, November 15, 2018
Infrastructure Investment and the Federal Government, CRS In Focus, updated November 19, 2018
Insulin Products and the Cost of Diabetes Treatment, CRS In Focus, November 19, 2018
Quantum Information Science: Applications, Global Research and Development, and Policy Considerations, updated November 19, 2018
What Role Might the Federal Government Play in Law Enforcement Reform?, CRS In Focus, updated November 16, 2018
Who Can Serve as Acting Attorney General, CRS Legal Sidebar, November 15, 2018
When a hurricane hits, it’s all hands on deck – that goes for federal data, too. Pulling back from our investments in timely, accurate, and accessible public data will only make us less prepared and put us all at greater risk.
This is bigger than a singular elimination of race and ethnicity questions. It could accelerate the second wave of widespread reductions to demographic data, leaving public health officials with even less information to deliver better health outcomes for all Americans.
Soft law was never meant to be a permanent solution. Treating it as one, and letting the sandcastle stand in for the skyscraper indefinitely, is how we end up with a decade of voluntary commitments and no enforceable accountability to show for it.
FAS has partnered with ICLEI USA to launch the CRI Local Advisory Council.