Violent instability in Central America poses a growing threat to the countries of the region, with direct and indirect consequences for the United States, according to a new report (pdf) from the Congressional Research Service.
“The seven nations of Central America face significant security challenges. Well-financed and heavily armed criminal threats, fragile political and judicial systems, and persistent social hardships such as poverty and unemployment contribute to widespread insecurity in the region. The United States has allocated $260 million in security assistance to support Central America since FY2008 under what is now known as the Central America Regional Security Initiative; however, security conditions have continued to deteriorate,” the CRS report said.
A copy of the report was obtained by Secrecy News. See “Central America Regional Security Initiative: Background and Policy Issues for Congress,” March 30, 2011.
Other noteworthy new CRS reports include the following (all pdf).
“The Japanese Nuclear Incident: Technical Aspects,” March 31, 2011.
“Nuclear Power Plant Sites: Maps of Seismic Hazards and Population Centers,” March 29, 2011.
“Japan’s 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami: Economic Effects and Implications for the United States,” March 25, 2011.
“Funeral Protests: Selected Federal Laws and Constitutional Issues,” March 22, 2011.
“War in Afghanistan: Strategy, Military Operations, and Issues for Congress,” March 9, 2011.
January saw us watching whether the government would fund science. February has been about how that funding will be distributed, regulated, and contested.
This rule gives agencies significantly more authority over certain career policy roles. Whether that authority improves accountability or creates new risks depends almost entirely on how agencies interrupt and apply it.
Our environmental system was built for 1970s-era pollution control, but today it needs stable, integrated, multi-level governance that can make tradeoffs, share and use evidence, and deliver infrastructure while demonstrating that improved trust and participation are essential to future progress.
Durable and legitimate climate action requires a government capable of clearly weighting, explaining, and managing cost tradeoffs to the widest away of audiences, which in turn requires strong technocratic competency.