A Look at U.S. Arms Sales to Middle East, & More from CRS
Some restrictions on U.S. arms sales to human rights violators in the Middle East have recently been relaxed by the Trump Administration, a new report from the Congressional Research Service noted.
“In early 2016, Bahrain submitted a request to purchase a number of F-16s [from the U.S.] and to upgrade its existing aircraft in a deal worth as much as $4 billion. However, when the Obama Administration informally pre-notified the sale to Congress, it explained that the sale would not move forward unless Bahrain took steps toward improving its record on human rights. The Trump Administration dropped those conditions in March 2017, even though U.N. investigators have asserted a ‘sharp deterioration’ of human rights over the past year in Bahrain. Congress was formally notified of the sale in September 2017.”
The use of self-imposed U.S. restriction on arms sales “as a mechanism to achieve changes in [foreign] behavior has questionable effectiveness and can have unintended consequences,” said CENTCOM Commander Gen. Joseph L. Votel in Senate testimony quoted by CRS. “We should avoid using the programs as a lever of influence or denial to our own detriment.”
The new CRS report describes and analyzes arms sales to seven Middle Eastern countries.
“The United States is the single largest arms supplier to the Middle East and has been for decades. However, other major producers like Russia, France, and China are also key players in the region. Their respective strategies and goals for arms sales appear to differ in some ways,” the report said.
See Arms Sales in the Middle East: Trends and Analytical Perspectives for U.S. Policy, October 11, 2017.
Other new and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), updated October 11, 2017
NAFTA Renegotiation and Modernization, October 12, 2017
Defense Primer: Military Pay Raise, CRS In Focus, updated October 10, 2017
The Army’s Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T) Program, CRS Insight, October 10, 2017
U.S. Periods of War and Dates of Recent Conflicts, updated October 11, 2017
Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2017, updated October 12, 2017
“One thing became increasingly clear: AI doesn’t simply introduce a new category of risk. It changes the speed, scale, complexity, and interaction of risks that already exist.”
In an ideal world, we would not have state or federal climate intervention research bans. We would have researchers and institutions that would not shy away from revealing the good, the bad, and the ugly of these technologies and doing so responsibly.
“What excites me is that it’s very tempting to be very discouraged, and say, ‘Oh, we’ve got these archaic institutions that are calcified and you could never change them.’ But I think we’re in the middle of a technological revolution that will upend lots of things, and does provide a window.”
Ask people what worries them most right now, and they’ll say the cost of living and their livelihoods, not climate change. But those concerns are not separate.