The [C]Worthy Project will create first-of-its-kind, open-source software infrastructure for ocean carbon measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) to help drive the nascent marine-based carbon dioxide removal market.
There is scientific consensus that industrial-scale Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) will be necessary to meet the Paris Agreement’s goal of keeping the rise in global temperature to within 1.5°C or 2°C. By enhancing the ocean’s natural capacity for carbon sequestration and long-term storage, ocean-based CDR is one of the few strategies with the potential to remove carbon at the necessary scales. While investments are pouring into the design and early-stage deployment of ocean-based CDR technologies, the ocean is a complex ecosystem, a constantly moving fluid, posing challenges to quantifying ocean-based CDR projects. It is essential to establish scientifically credible methods for quantifying net carbon removal from CDR deployments and codify these as standards for Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV). [C]worthy is proposing transformative, open-source, technical solutions to confront these challenges.
[C]worthy aims at building the first foundational open-source computational infrastructure for MRV of ocean-based carbon dioxide removal technologies. The [C]worthy team will develop an innovative and first-of-its-kind MRV software infrastructure applicable across the range of ocean-based CDR technologies that are currently under study and testing in the US and internationally. This MRV platform will integrate ocean observations and advanced Earth system modeling tools at regional to global scales; it will incorporate ocean biogeochemistry and ecosystem models and data assimilation capabilities and it will advance techniques for efficient computation and analysis. This platform will be designed as open-source infrastructure with interoperable components—ensuring transparency and broad access to a growing CDR community.
What is a Focused Research Organization?
Focused Research Organizations (FROs) are time-limited mission-focused research teams organized like a startup to tackle a specific mid-scale science or technology challenge. FRO projects seek to produce transformative new tools, technologies, processes, or datasets that serve as public goods, creating new capabilities for the research community with the goal of accelerating scientific and technological progress more broadly. Crucially, FRO projects are those that often fall between the cracks left by existing research funding sources due to conflicting incentives, processes, mission, or culture. There are likely a large range of project concepts for which agencies could leverage FRO-style entities to achieve their mission and advance scientific progress.
This project is suited for a FRO-style approach because the [C]worthy development project requires a level of coordinated computational engineering that is too big for a single academic lab, too complex for a loose multi-lab collaboration, and not directly profitable enough for a venture-backed startup or industrial R&D project. It is aiming to develop an open-source IT infrastructure, which is a product of public benefit for science and technology. This requires tight-knit coordinated effort in a fast-paced start-up-like environment. It is therefore best fit for the FRO model.
- Matt Long, PhD, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Matt Hourihan, Federation of American Scientists, email@example.com
- Alice Wu, Federation of American Scientists, firstname.lastname@example.org
While the U.S. government grapples with the definition of the bioeconomy and what sectors it does and does not contain, another definitional issue needs to be addressed: What does sustainability mean in a bioeconomy?
Federal clearinghouses should incorporate open science practices into their standards and procedures used to identify evidence-based social programs eligible for federal funding.
To better address security and sustainability of open source software, the United States should establish a Digital Technology Fund through multi-stakeholder participation.
Building on existing data and privacy efforts, the White House and federal science agencies should collaborate to develop and implement clear standards for research data privacy across the data management and sharing life cycle.