The Role of Contractors in Military Operations, and More from CRS
The Pentagon’s reliance on contractors to support military operations has now become so extensive that some argue it should be… even more extensive!
These advocates “believe that DOD should be prepared to effectively award and manage contracts at a moment’s notice, anywhere in the world, in unknown environments, and on a scale that may exceed the total contract obligations of any other federal agency,” according to a new report from the Congressional Research Service.
As of March 2013, there were approximately 108,000 DoD contractor personnel in Afghanistan, CRS reports, representing 62% of the total force.
“Contractors provide a wide range of services, from transportation, construction, and base support, to intelligence analysis and private security,” CRS notes. “The benefits of using contractors include freeing up uniformed personnel to conduct combat operations; providing expertise in specialized fields, such as linguistics or weapon systems maintenance; and providing a surge capability, quickly delivering critical support capabilities tailored to specific military needs.”
But “Just as the effective use of contractors can augment military capabilities, the ineffective use of contractors can prevent troops from receiving what they need, when they need it, and can lead to the wasteful spending of billions of dollars. Contractors can also compromise the credibility and effectiveness of the U.S. military and undermine operations, as many analysts believe have occurred in recent operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.”
The new CRS report sifts through the implications of this situation, and proposes an oversight agenda for Congressional consideration. See Department of Defense’s Use of Contractors to Support Military Operations: Background, Analysis, and Issues for Congress, May 17, 2013.
Other new and updated CRS reports that Congress has directed CRS not to release to the public include the following.
Compounded Drugs, May 23, 2013
Financial Stability Oversight Council: A Framework to Mitigate Systemic Risk, May 21, 2013
Federal Research and Development Funding: FY2014, May 23, 2013
SBA Assistance to Small Business Startups: Client Experiences and Program Impact, May 22, 2013
501(c)(4)s and Campaign Activity: Analysis Under Tax and Campaign Finance Laws, May 17, 2013
Restrictions on Itemized Tax Deductions: Policy Options and Analysis, May 21, 2013
The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: Lessons Learned and Issues for Policymakers, May 21, 2013
Ukraine: Current Issues and U.S. Policy, May 24, 2013
Congressional Primer on Major Disasters and Emergencies, May 24, 2013
Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes in the United States, May 22, 2013
On Tuesday, December 23rd, the Department of Defense released its annual congressionally-mandated report on China’s military developments, also known as the “China Military Power Report,” or “CMPR.” The report is typically a valuable injection of information into the open source landscape, and represents a useful barometer for how the Pentagon assesses both the intentions and […]
Successful NC3 modernization must do more than update hardware and software: it must integrate emerging technologies in ways that enhance resilience, ensure meaningful human control, and preserve strategic stability.
The FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) paints a picture of a Congress that is working to both protect and accelerate nuclear modernization programs while simultaneously lacking trust in the Pentagon and the Department of Energy to execute them.
For Impact Fellow John Whitmer, working in public service was natural. “I’ve always been around people who make a living by caring.”