The conflict in South Sudan is one of four in the world — along with those in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen — that are classified by the United Nations as humanitarian emergencies of the highest order (Level 3), a newly updated report from the Congressional Research Service points out.
“U.N. officials estimate that at least 50,000 people have been killed since the conflict began, but no reliable death count exists, and some experts suggest the toll may be much higher. More than 2.7 million people have been displaced since December 2013. At least 1.7 million people are displaced internally, and in September 2016 the number of refugees surpassed 1 million.”
For background on the conflict and its humanitarian impact, see Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead, updated September 22, 2016.
Other new and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
Saudi Arabia: Background and U.S. Relations, updated September 20, 2016
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues, updated September 27, 2016
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Tehran’s Compliance with International Obligations, updated September 26, 2016
Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy, updated September 26, 2016
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Regulations: Background and Issues for Congress, September 28, 2016
Housing for Persons Living with HIV/AIDS, updated September 27, 2016
The Yahoo! Data Breach–Issues for Congress, CRS Insight, September 26, 2016
Wells Fargo Customer Account Scandal: Regulatory Policy Issues, CRS Insight, September 28, 2016
Monuments and Memorials Authorized Under the Commemorative Works Act in the District of Columbia: Current Development of In-Progress and Lapsed Works, updated September 26, 2016
U.S. Peanut Program and Issues, updated September 27, 2016
Americans are paying too much for almost everything, because the United States has long treated its trucking industry as an artifact to be preserved rather than as an opportunity for innovation.
These ideas aim to advance the detailed policy solutions needed to foster public trust and implement fairness in the adoption of AI across diverse domains, from healthcare and government benefits to rural access, education, and worker protections.
The evidence is clear: algorithmic pay-setting is established in app-based work, and payroll/timekeeping failures show how software can produce systemic wage harm at scale
While a few states have taken steps to implement decision-making mechanisms for certain AI systems, too many leaders are simply accepting narratives about AI’s purported public benefit at face value – jumping to the “how” of AI implementation before thoroughly vetting potential systems and deciding whether they are appropriate to use at all.