
Preliminary Analysis of the 6 April 98 Pakistani Ghauri Missile Test
April 10, 1998
David Wright
Union of Concerned Scientists and
Security Studies Program, MIT
I have conducted a preliminary analysis of the information available in
the press about the reported Ghauri missile test. This is based in part
on my past analysis of the North Korean Nodong missile.
Some reports have stated that the missile appears similar to the Nodong.
From the photos of the launch that were released by Pakistani
television, one can get a very rough estimate of the size of the missile
based on the trucks in the background. From this, the missile appears to
be very roughly the same size as, though possibly smaller than, the
Nodong, which is reported to be 15.2 meters long and 1.2 meters in
diameter. (The photo is at
http://www.jang-group.com/thenews/apr98-daily/07-04-98/frmain.htm)
Several reports have given the total mass of the Gharui missile as 16
tonnes (te) and the payload as 700 kg. Fuel masses of both 13 and 14
tonnes have been reported. A fuel mass of 14 tonnes would give a fuel
fraction for the booster of 91.5%, which appears unrealistically high
without access to very lightweight materials. A fuel mass of 13 tonnes
would give a fuel fraction of 85%, which is a reasonable value assuming
the missile body is made of aluminum, rather than steel (which Scuds are
made of). Thus a total mass of 16 tonnes and a fuel mass of 13 tonnes
appears to be self-consistent.
In comparison, my analysis of the Nodong gives estimates of the mass
that are a couple of tonnes larger than these figures (about 18.5 tonnes
total mass and 15 tonnes of fuel). Thus, if the reported figures for the
Ghauri are correct, the missile appears to be the same general size but
somewhat smaller than a Nodong.
(One report stated that the Ghauri had three stages. This
appears to be a misinterpretation of Pakistani reports that "the missile
will formally be tested in three stages.")
A Test to a Range of 1,100 Kilometers?
Press reports about the Ghauri have typically mentioned a range of 1,500
km for the missile, but the range of the test is usually given as 1,100
km with a flight time of 9 minutes and 58 seconds. Many reports mention
that the missile rose to an altitude of 350 km. This appears to refer to
the apogee, or highest point of the trajectory, which occurs in the
middle of the trajectory.
My calculations show that a missile powered by four Scud engines (which
is the Nodong configuration) and having a mass of 16 tonnes and carried
13 tonnes of fuel would have a maximum range of about 1,100 km with a
700 kg payload. (This assumes a sea-level specific impulse of 222
seconds, which is the value for Scud B engines fueled by kerosene and
nitric acid.) The standard trajectory for this range would give an
apogee of about 300 km and a flight time of about 9.6 minutes. However,
if this missile was flown on a slightly lofted trajectory, it could
still reach 1,100 km range but with an apogee of 350 km and a flight
time of just over 10 minutes, which would agree with the press reports.
Thus, the press reports might be consistent with a Nodong-like missile.
It is interesting to note that if the payload of such a missile were
reduced from 700 kg to 200 kg, the range would increase to roughly 1,500
km.
A Test to a Range of 700 Kilometers?
It is possible, however, that the range of the test was considerably
shorter. Several press reports state that the launch took place in
northern Paksitan near the city of Jhelum and that impact occurred near
the city of Quetta. From a map it is easy to verify that these cities
are only about 700 km apart. (One source within Pakistan said that he
had heard that impact occurred on the southern coast of Baluchistan. If
true, this would allow enough space for a 1,100 km flight test if
launched from Jhelum.)
If the flight test was 700 km rather than 1,100 km, this suggests a
different explanation. In mid-1997, Pakistan claimed to be developing an
800 km Hatf 3 missile. An 800 km range missile on a normal trajectory
would have an apogee of about 200 km and a flight time of 8 minutes.
However, if the missile trajectory was lofted slightly to give an apogee
of 350 km, my calculations show that the missile would then have a range
of about 700 km and a flight time of ten minutes.
It is also interesting to note that if the payload on this missile were
reduced from 700 kg to 200 kg, the range would increase to about 1,100
km.
Without knowing more details, there are several possibilities that need
to be considered:
(1) One possibility is that missile masses given in the press reports
are wrong but the test range of 1,100 km is correct, and the Ghauri is a
Nodong missile that was sold to Pakistan by North Korea. There are
reports of contacts between Pakistan and North Korea concerning missiles
over the past five years, and this may have been the result of those
contacts. If the US and other countries believe this is the case, it is
difficult to understand the muted international reaction to the launch.
Evidence of a foreign Nodong sale would be of especially great concern
to Israel.
(2) A second possibility is that the Ghauri is largely indigenous, but
is a design similar to the Nodong. The Nodong is believed to achieve its
range by clustering four Scud engines. For simple liquid-fueled engines
of this type, clustering is an obvious step to increase missile range
and should not be a difficult thing to do. If Pakistan has working
short-range, Scud-type liquid-fueled engines that it has either
developed or purchased, it seems plausible that it could build a
longer-range missile by clustering engines. Ground tests of a missile
engine were reported in Pakistan last year, which may have been an
engine it used in the Ghauri. Pakistan may have received technical
assistance or even some hardware from abroad (North Korea or elsewhere),
which it may then have used to build such a missile.
The point here is that even if the missile is in fact similar to a
Nodong, it does not necessarily mean that North Korea transferred a
Nodong missile to Pakistan. It is worth noting that since Pakistan's
earlier experience in missile design was with solid-fuel engines, if the
Ghauri is liquid-fueled it would suggest some level of assistance from
abroad.
(3) A third possibility is that Pakistan has a missile with an 800 km
range and that the test was only 700 km. This would be consistent with
Pakistani claims last year that it had an 800 km Hatf 3, although
apparently no test of a missile to that range has been observed. As
mentioned above, ground tests of an engine being developed were reported
last year, and were believed to be for Hatf 3 missile.
(4) A fourth possibility is that the missile is completely different
from the Nodong. Some reports have raised the possibility that China
transferred a missile or assisted Pakistan in building a missile of its
own. The missile in the television photo does not look like a Chinese
M-9 missile (600 km range).
(5) A final possibility that has been raised is that the launch shown on
television was of a much shorter-range missile, and that Pakistan is
exaggerating its missile capability for political purposes. Estimating
the size of the missile from the television photo seems to give
dimensions that are too large for a Scud B or M-11, but the estimate is
so rough that it is not possible to rule out this possibility entirely.
Additional Resources