Index

AG Reno's Weekly Press Conference, Friday, September 22

WEEKLY MEDIA AVAILABILITY WITH ATTORNEY GENERAL JANET RENO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 9:32 A.M. EDT FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2000 Q: Issue two. (Laughter.) Speaking of visits to the White House, we understand from the White House that you are going up to meet with the President privately on the Wen Ho Lee case. First, can you -- and that you've already spoken with him on the phone about it. What can you tell us at this point about your conversation with the President and whether the Justice Department and the White House still have any different perspectives on how the case was handled? ATTY GEN. RENO: We didn't go into detail, but we had a good conversation and I look forward to meeting with him this morning. Q: Can you say any more about what made that conversation good? I mean, did he explain what he had meant to say in any way? ATTY GEN. RENO: I think we had a chance to discuss it, and he was thoughtful and supportive. Q: Ms. Reno, were you surprised at the President's remarks? And secondly, in your conversation with him, did you have a chance to clarify why the government took some of the steps it took? ATTY GEN. RENO: I think it's important as we clarify that we do so in detail. And I told him I'd look forward to the meeting to do that. And I think anybody who looks at this case and doesn't know the circumstances of it is going to say, "Why?" And I think that's what the President kind of naturally asked. Q: Well, didn't he know the circumstances? ATTY GEN. RENO: The important thing is that the President of the United States has taken great care not to infringe in law enforcement decisions so as to avoid a political charge that it's politically influenced. He has been very good about that and has -- really I can't think of any case in which he has interfered in any way that I consider inappropriate. He was doing his job. Q: You said he was thoughtful and supportive. He didn't sound all that supportive last week. Is that to say his position, his concerns have changed since talking to you? When you say he was supportive, what does that mean? ATTY GEN. RENO: You'd have to ask him about a shift in position. But as I read it, he, like everybody else, said, how do you go from here to here, and why did it happen? I think he's had a chance to -- we had a chance to talk and I think we'll talk this morning, and I think he'll understand. Q: Is it your position that there's no need to review the Wen Ho Lee case and how it was handled? ATTY GEN. RENO: My position is that we review and review and review to see if there's anything that we would do differently, try to learn from it. What I want to try to do is make sure that everything is as open as possible, that I can make available to the public as much as I possibly can so that they can understand exactly what happened and what the issues were. Q: Ms. Reno, is the White House aware -- were they aware of the Bellows report, which to a degree already examined how the allegations of Chinese espionage were looked at? Does that play, in terms of what the Justice Department is able to say to the White House, "Look, we've been looking at how we address this issue"? ATTY. GEN. RENO: I don't want to go into that. That's part of the effort that I'm undertaking, to try to make sure that as much as is there is available. Q: Are you going to be able to report to the President that it appears -- or, does it appear that Wen Ho Lee is coming clean? Is there an indication that that is happening? ATTY. GEN. RENO: The debriefing has not started yet. Q: Oh, it has not started? Q: (Off mike) -- bring up any concerns to the President about the way he made his remarks in public? I mean, having any sense of, you know, letdown from your end or concern about that? ATTY. GEN. RENO: I wasn't let down. I understand how somebody can ask a question, "Why?". Q: Ms. Reno, the President's Commission is looking into why Wen Ho Lee was kept in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day. Do you plan to investigate why Susan McDougal was kept in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day for eight months? ATTY. GEN. RENO: I'm not familiar with the commission that you're talking about. Q: Back on the Wen Ho Lee matter, Ms. Reno, next Tuesday there's a Congressional hearing on how this matter was handled by the Justice Department. I think it's the Senate Judiciary Committee. Are you planning to testify? And do you have any concerns? I've heard that the Justice Department does have concerns that that hearing is taking place before Dr. Lee is debriefed. ATTY. GEN. RENO: I think it would be best if we could have the debriefing and try to make sure that we did it without premature release of information that might in any way interfere with the debriefing, but if Congress wants to go ahead, we will be available. Q: Will you be circumscribed in what you can say? ATTY. GEN. RENO: What I want to try to do is be as open as I possibly can, but I don't want to do anything that would interfere with the debriefing. Q: Ms. Reno, is there anything else you can share with the public for why the government did take the steps it took in terms of the conditions of his detention? ATTY. GEN. RENO: Do you have a specific question other than what I -- (Quiet laughter.) Q: I guess the question is, the conditions, the critics say, were pretty harsh in terms of his limitations on communications with outside persons, and the question would be -- ATTY. GEN. RENO: Well, I mean, the question, quite clearly, there is what happened to the tapes? If he destroyed them, did he tell anybody? Did he have other copies? Where was the information? Where had it -- if it had been relayed to someone, who had it been relayed to? If the tapes were still in existence, where were they? Who might be able to pick them up and dispose of them? We felt that we had to limit his communication with people that might impair our ability to locate the tapes. Q: (Off mike) -- point in the Wen Ho Lee case, that when the FISA -- (inaudible word) -- was turned on a couple of years ago, afterwards you expressed concern that perhaps you didn't have all the information you should have had and needed to have, and perhaps Mr. Freeh didn't either. Do you think that in this last go-around, at the point where this was nearing trial, charges were brought, do you think you had all the information you needed to decide was he a national security risk, should he be kept in solitary, should 59 counts have been brought? Did you have all the information this time? ATTY GEN. RENO: Well, take specifically the issues that you raise about the 59 counts. That, again, is based on taking each of the tapes and perfecting a charge with respect to each of the tapes. I think we had the information there. But what we will do is review everything to determine just what we could have done differently. Q: What form will that review take? ATTY GEN. RENO: I will continue to look at it and, as people ask questions about it, look at it and try to respond to those questions.