(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT
NUMBER & TITLE |
FY 1996
ACTUAL |
FY 1997
ESTIMATE |
FY 1998
ESTIMATE |
FY 1999
ESTIMATE |
FY 2000
ESTIMATE |
FY 2001
ESTIMATE |
FY 2002
ESTIMATE |
FY 2003
ESTIMATE |
TO
COMPLETE |
TOTAL
PROGRAM | |
| L2097 | Manpower, Personnel, and Training |
| 262 | 240 | 252 | 291 | 298 | 305 | 312 | 319 | CONT. | CONT. |
| M0106 | Naval Medical Support Capability |
| 104 | 96 | 103 | 119 | 121 | 124 | 127 | 130 | CONT. | CONT. |
| R0132 | CNO Program Analysis and Evaluation |
| 1,600 | 232 | 262 | 308 | 316 | 323 | 330 | 337 | CONT. | CONT. |
| R0133 | National Academy of Sciences/Naval Studies Board |
| 1,476 | 2,134 | 2,376 | 2,397 | 2,410 | 2,408 | 2,460 | 2,516 | CONT. | CONT. |
| R0147 | Operational Strategic and Tactical Effectiveness Analysis |
| 381 | 355 | 403 | 471 | 482 | 492 | 503 | 515 | CONT. | CONT. |
| R2040 | Foreign Ship and Submarine Vulnerability Program |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,403 |
| S2233 | Naval Surface Warfare Studies |
| 1,737 | 1,607 | 1,951 | 2,185 | 2,240 | 2,286 | 2,329 | 2,378 | CONT. | CONT. |
| W2092 | Naval Aviation Studies |
| 1,998 | 2,015 | 3,408 | 3,493 | 2,030 | 2,050 | 2,086 | 2,140 | CONT. | CONT. | ||
| TOTAL | 7,558 | 6,679 | 8,755 | 9,264 | 7,897 | 7,988 | 8,147 | 8,335 | CONT. | CONT. |
(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program provides analytical support to the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations as a basis for major policy, planning and acquisition program execution decisions. It supports research and development strategy development and planning. It supports studies in the areas of manpower, personnel, training, and aviation. It also develops analytical tools for evaluating effectiveness of U.S. weapons against potential foreign threat ships and submarines.
U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT because it supports the
operations and installations required for general research and development use.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT
NUMBER & TITLE |
FY 1996
ACTUAL |
FY 1997
ESTIMATE |
FY 1998
ESTIMATE |
FY |
FY 2000
ESTIMATE |
FY 2001
ESTIMATE |
FY 2002
ESTIMATE |
FY 2003
ESTIMATE |
TO
COMPLETE |
TOTAL
PROGRAM | |
| L2097 | Manpower, Personnel and Training |
| 262 | 240 | 252 | 291 | 298 | 305 | 312 | 319 | CONT. | CONT. | ||
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Chief of Naval Personnel has an ongoing need for direct analyses of Navy manpower and personnel (MP) policies and program planning. This project provides an essential management tool to: (a) assess the effectiveness of existing MP policies and programs, (b) identify needs for new policies and programs, (c) determine the required manpower and training mix relative to changing demographic, societal and legislative/regulatory trends, and to evolving strategic and geopolitical factors, (d) study the impact of MP programs on Navy accession, retention, and performance, and (e) develop, validate and/or refine a broad range of MP forecasting models. The program permits Navy to more effectively utilize Research and Development expertise to respond to emerging MP problems.
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($55K) Conducted a study comparing the ability requirements implied by the accession plan with the qualifications for assignment to A-school.
(U) ($96K) Started a manpower modeling and simulation study to accurately determine shipboard manpower requirements.
(U) ($41K) Conducted an analysis and validation of the precision of the Onboard All Year Model in predicting outyear PCS cost moves requirements.
(U) ($50K) Conducted analysis of Navy Violence Control and Prevention programs.
(U) ($20K) Initiated survey and study to support the Chief of Naval Operations' (CNO) Homesteading/Homebasing Initiative.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($87K) Conduct study to determine Time-on-Station metric for Permanent Change of Station (PCS) cost control.
(U) ($65K) Conduct Analysis of Aviation Career Incentive Pay (ACIP) to access continuation of bonus pay.
(U) ($68K) Conduct study to determine realistic accession quality requirements.
(U) ($28K) Conduct study to evaluate appropriate multiple Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) cut-
score requirements for "A" Schools.
(U) (-$10K) Undistributed adjustment for NWCF Surcharge and General reductions.
(U) ($2K) Portion of program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessments in accordance with 15
USC 638.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) ($75K) Support efforts to redefine and establish career paths for Navy enlisted personnel similar to the Navy officer career paths.
(U) ($75K) Continue to examine cultural diversity and the impact it will have on readiness and effectiveness.
(U) ($54K) Continue to support study efforts to accurately determine manpower requirements at sea and ashore.
(U) ($50K) Support efforts to improve upon Navy family issues and their impact on retention and readiness.
(U) (-$2K) Undistributed adjustment for NWCF carryover and rates.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
(U) ($100K) Support studies requirements generated by the Bureau of Naval Personnel's move to Millington, TN - impact on personnel communication, and organizational issues.
(U) ($100K) Continue to support studies directed at improving manning and manpower determination issues.
(U) ($93K) Support Quality of Life study requirements and the impact quality of life has on retention and readiness.
(U) (-$2K) Undistributed adjustment for NWCF carryover and rates.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | ||
| (U) FY 1997 President's Budget: | 266 | 250 | 254 | 293 | |
| (U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: | -4 | -10 | -2 | -2 | |
| (U) 1998/99 President's Budget: | 262 | 240 | 252 | 291 |
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: Reductions of (-4K) in FY96, (-10K) in FY97, (-2K) in FY98, and (-2K) in FY 99 are due to Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) rate adjustments and SBIR assessments.
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0603707N (Manpower, Personnel, and Training Advanced Technology Development)
(U) PE 0604703N (Manpower, Personnel, Training, Simulation and Human Factors)
(U) PE 0602234N (Materials, Electronics and Computer Technology)
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT
NUMBER & TITLE |
FY 1996
ACTUAL |
FY 1997
ESTIMATE |
FY 1998
ESTIMATE |
FY 1999
ESTIMATE |
FY 2000
ESTIMATE |
FY 2001
ESTIMATE |
FY 2002
ESTIMATE |
FY 2003
ESTIMATE |
TO
COMPLETE |
TOTAL
PROGRAM | |
| M0106 | Naval Medical Support Capability |
| 104 | 96 | 103 | 119 | 121 | 124 | 127 | 130 | CONT. | CONT. |
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides validated data to identify the root causes of problems and to optimize services associated with the health care delivery to Navy and Marine Corps personnel afloat and in contingency operations. This usually requires database and model development and statistical analyses of inter-related requirements or operational variables, and their impact on performance. The analysis of these variables requires a combination of medical/technical knowledge and operational perspectives.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
2. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($79K) Entered the data from survey returned by women who visited any of three major Naval hospitals in 1993 as pregnant active-duty Navy women. Commenced analysis of survey data to assess risk-factor information, pregnancy outcome, gestational age, and birth weight. Produced technical report on the analysis of the hospitalization data of all hospitalized pregnancy conclusions of Navy women in Navy military treatment facilities (MTFs) between 1982 and 1992. Results included the determination of pregnancy outcome rates in Navy enlisted women, and the identification of E1s as high-risk group for early fetal death outcomes.
I. (U) ($25K) In response to an inquiry by RADM N.K. Dysart, Director of the Medical Resources, Plans and Policy Division, Officer of the Chief of Naval Operations, a study was undertaken to examine the relationship between back disorders and aircraft type flown by Navy aviators. Physical examination records of 7,675 Navy pilots and aircrew members provided by Naval Aerospace Medical Institute were analyzed. Results found that aircrew members were more likely to have diagnosed back disorders than pilots for both fixed and rotary wing aircraft and that flight was found for a relationship between aircraft type and diagnosed back problems among pilots. This report is under pre-publication review.
3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($96K) Establish a database from multiple sources and examine the relationships between completed suicides, gestures, and attempts, and organizational and environmental factors in the Navy and Marine Corps to identify risk factors and opportunities for intervention.
4. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
II. (U) ($103K) Establish a database from multiple sources and examine the relationship between alcohol use/abuse and accidents, emphasizing the cost incurred and man days lost.
5. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
III. (U) ($119K) Examine the relationships between chemical, radiological and biological occupational exposures such as lead and organic solvent use and reproductive health among Navy and Marine Corps active-duty women.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | ||
| (U) FY 1997 President's Budget: | 105 | 100 | 103 | 119 | |
| (U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: | -1 | -4 | 0 | 0 | |
| (U) 1998/99 President's Budget: | 104 | 96 | 103 | 119 |
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: Reductions of $1 thousand in FY96 and $4 thousand in FY97 are the result of minor pricing adjustments.
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT
NUMBER & TITLE |
FY 1996
ACTUAL |
FY 1997
ESTIMATE |
FY 1998
ESTIMATE |
FY 1999
ESTIMATE |
FY 2000
ESTIMATE |
FY 2001
ESTIMATE |
FY 2002
ESTIMATE |
FY 2003
ESTIMATE |
TO
COMPLETE |
TOTAL
PROGRAM |
| R0132 | CNO Program Analysis and Evaluation |
| 1,600 | 232 | 262 | 308 | 316 | 323 | 330 | 337 | CONT. | CONT. |
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides analytical support to the Chief of Naval Operations and the Secretary of the Navy in evaluation of overall balance within total Navy programs. This includes such tasks as: (a) evaluation of force capabilities and requirements; (b) analysis of effectiveness of systems under development; (c) Secretary of Defense directed independent cost and effectiveness analyses of major Navy programs; and (d) items of Congressional interest as they relate to Navy programs. Deliverables consist of formal, structured documents containing or leading to conclusions and/or recommendations as well as the development and maintenance of databases and models. The use of databases and models is driven by the need to objectively and continually assess the impact of reduced funding and/or force drawdown upon Navy programs. They provide Navy planners and decision makers with objective, empirical data with which to make determinations regarding program planning and evaluation of issues. The models funded by this account are the primary tools used to formulate program balance in the assessment process (particularly the Readiness, Support and Infrastructure Assessment and the Investment Balance Review). The analyses based on these models form the heart of the Investment Balance Review, allowing the Navy to formulate and cost-out alternative force structure, manpower, infrastructure and readiness programs.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($200) Maintained the Aviation Readiness model and the Ships Resource-to-Readiness model
I. (U) ($1,400) Provided Navy's share of costs for development of an electronic desk reference set for the exchange of information to support the entire acquisition community. Components included an information reference application, a catalog of software tools, and an acquisition management forum.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($206) Maintain the Aviation Readiness model and the Ships Resource-to-Readiness model
II. (U) ($26) Continue to conduct studies and analyses to support the Navy's Assessment process.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
III. (U) ($213) Maintain the Aviation Readiness model and the Ships Resource-to-Readiness model.
IV. (U) ($49) Continue to conduct studies and analyses to support the Navy's Assessment process.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
V. (U) ($218) Maintain the Aviation Readiness model and the Ships Resource-to-Readiness model.
VI. (U) ($90) Continue to conduct studies and analyses to support the Navy's Assessment process.