(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE | FY 1996 ACTUAL | FY 1997 ESTIMATE | FY 1998 ESTIMATE | FY 1999 ESTIMATE | FY 2000 ESTIMATE | FY 2001 ESTIMATE | FY 2002 ESTIMATE | FY 2003 ESTIMATE | TO COMPLETE | TOTAL PROGRAM |
| X0798 OTH Targeting | 1,815 | 1,377 | 1,617 | 1,837 | 1,821 | 1,862 | 1,903 | 1,948 | Cont. | Cont. |
| X2144 SEW Engineering | 3,561 | 3,583 | 3,088 | 4,840 | 4,752 | 4,861 | 4,571 | 4,180 | Cont. | Cont. |
| TOTAL | 5,376 | 4,960 | 4,705 | 6,677 | 6,573 | 6,723 | 6,474 | 6,128 | Cont. | Cont. |
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This Program Element (PE) contains two projects: Over-the-Horizon (OTH) Targeting and Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Engineering. Both projects are systems engineering non-acquisition programs with the objectives of developing, testing and validating Naval Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) architectures to support naval missions in Joint and Coalition Theater. The mission of this program element is carried out by multiple tasks that are used to ensure Naval Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I), Surveillance, and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) components of SEW are effectively integrated into the C4ISR architectures. The Program additionally ensures that (1) the composite operational capabilities of SEW systems (not the individual component systems) conform to the Naval C4ISR architecture as related to the objectives of National Defense Strategy and evolving joint visions and direction, such as "COPERNICUS...Forward", "Forward...From the Sea" and C4I For the Warrior, the Defense Science Board Summer Study Task Force on Information Architecture for the Battlefield and are guided by CINC requirements; and (2) that SEW systems and systems integration effort involves leading-edge technology transfer of information processing technologies primarily through integration of government and commercial off-the-shelf (COTS/GOTS) products to enhance the Navy's operational capability, interoperability, flexible reconfiguration, as well as reduce costs.
(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION because it develops and integrates hardware for experimental test related to specific ship or aircraft applications.
(U) COST: (Dollars in thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE | FY 1996 ACTUAL | FY 1997 ESTIMATE | FY 1998 ESTIMATE | FY 1999 ESTIMATE | FY 2000 ESTIMATE | FY 2001 ESTIMATE | FY 2002 ESTIMATE | FY 2003 ESTIMATE | TO COMPLETE | TOTAL PROGRAM |
X0798 OTH Targeting 1,815 1,377 1,617 1,837 1,821 1,862 1,903 1,948 Cont. Cont.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Over-the-Horizon Targeting (OTH-T) project supports prototyping and engineering activities critical to the development of operational capabilities to target TOMAHAWK and HARPOON cruise missiles beyond the sensor range of the launch platforms. Specifically, to: Demonstrate enhanced capability to integrate sensor data using prototype sensor interface systems, and provide that information via satellite communications to: (1) the Force Over-the-Horizon Track Coordinator (FOTC) for input into the common tactical/operational picture, and (2) to TOMAHAWK and HARPOON cruise missile targeting systems. This line supports the promulgation of composite OTH-T system specifications; Certifies the interoperability of, and exercises configuration control over any system that operates on the Officer-in-Tactical Command Information Exchange System (OTCIXS) net. This ensures the integrity of the net for transmission of OTH-T messages as new systems come onto the net, or as existing systems undergo substantive software revisions/upgrades. This line also provides technical expertise afloat and ashore via a cadre of highly-trained Fleet Systems Engineers who ensure smooth integration of new capabilities to enhance OTH-T during major Fleet exercises and demonstrations which are used to validate and evaluate developed portions of Navy Battle Force Information Architecture.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
($906) Provided Fleet Engineering Support to Fleet Commanders in Chiefs (CINCs) to perform the following: monitored technical performance of Officer in Tactical Command Information Exchange System (OTCIXS) during introduction and demonstration of new capabilities, and provided end-to-end system engineering expertise to ensure smooth integration of Naval Tactical Command and Control System (NTCCS) into the Joint Maritime Command Information Strategy (JMCIS, GCCS, and coalition interfaces).
($909) OTH Targeting Interoperability Certification - Utilized Reconfigurable Land Based Test Site (RLBTS) to test evolutionary software enhancements of NTCCS to verify compliance with interoperability requirements before placing any system on the operational OTCIXS network.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
I. (U) ($225) Conduct prototyping and demonstrations of OUTLAW HAWKEYE, an initiative to field advanced communications information management and real time intelligence package for the E-2C Aircraft. Evaluate potential packages and E-2C architecture.
II. (U) ($585) Provide Fleet Engineering Support to Fleet CINCs to perform the following: monitor technical performance of OTCIXS during testing of interoperability of Advanced Tomahawk Weapon Control System (ATWCS), advanced submarine combat system (AN/BSY-2), migration of systems into JMCIS, and provide end-to-end system engineering expertise to ensure smooth integration of these same systems into the Fleet. Efforts have been reduced by $174K as a result of low expenditures in the accounting system for FY 1995.
III. ($4) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C.638.
IV. (U) ($563) OTH Targeting Interoperability Certification - Utilize RLBTS to test evolutionary software enhancements, i.e., systems migration into JMCIS, ATWCS, and BSY-2, to verify compliance with interoperability requirements. Efforts have been reduced by $157K as a result of low expenditures in the accounting system for FY 1995.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
V. ($276) Develop hardware/software packages for Command and Control (C2) aircraft on a cooperative basis with industry and the Air Force.
VI. ($693) Provide Fleet Engineering Support to Fleet CINCs to perform the following: monitor technical performance of OTCIXS during testing of interoperability of prototype systems into JMCIS, provide end to end system engineering expertise to ensure smooth integration of these same systems into the Fleet, and provide the testing environment which will aid in the integration of such systems for Fleet use.
VII. ($648) OTH Targeting Interoperability Certification - Utilize RLBTS to test evolutionary software enhancements, i.e., systems migration into JMCIS or GCCS, to verify compliance with interoperability requirements.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
VIII. ($311) Demonstrate and evaluate OUTLAW HAWKEYE package.
IX. ($803) Provide Fleet Engineering Support to Fleet CINCs to perform the following: monitor technical performance of OTCIXS during testing of interoperability of prototype systems into JMCIS, provide end-to-end system engineering expertise to ensure smooth integration of these systems into the Fleet, and provide the testing environment which will aid in the integration of such systems for Fleet use.
X. ($723) OTH Targeting Interoperability Certification - Utilize RLBTS to test evolutionary software enhancements, i.e., systems migration into JMCIS or GCCS, to verify compliance with interoperability requirements.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 1,844 1,444 1,671 1,876
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -29 -67 -54 -39
(U) FY 1998 President's Budget Submit: 1,815 1,377 1,617 1,837
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
FY 1996: Change reflects a decrease of $2K for the Jordan Rescission; $5K reduction for Administrative and Personal Services Rescission; and decrease of $22K for SBIR.
FY 1997: Change reflects a decrease of $67K for Congressional undistributed general adjustments.
FY 1998: Change reflects a Navy POM decision decrease of $2K; decrease of $48K for NWCF adjustments; and decrease of $4K for inflation.
FY 1999: Change reflects a Navy POM decision decrease of $2K; decrease of $30K for NWCF adjustments; and decrease of $7K for inflation.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: (SEW) Architecture/Engineering Support program element encompasses all Naval C4I related efforts.
A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)
Project Cost Categories FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
a. Program Management 82 37 35 45
b. System Test and Evaluation 870 700 791 895
c. Prototyping and Demonstration 225 276 311
d. Engineering 507 195 235 290
e. Fleet Support 356 220 280 296
Total 1,815 1,377 1,617 1,837
B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION: N/A
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE | FY 1996 ACTUAL | FY 1997 ESTIMATE | FY 1998 ESTIMATE | FY 1999 ESTIMATE | FY 2000 ESTIMATE | FY 2001 ESTIMATE | FY 2002 ESTIMATE | FY 2003 ESTIMATE | TO COMPLETE | TOTAL PROGRAM |
X2144 SEW Engineering 3,561 3,583 3,088 4,840 4,752 4,861 4,571 4,180 Cont. Cont.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Engineering is a non-acquisition systems engineering effort and has the objectives of developing, testing and validating a Naval Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) architecture to support naval missions in Joint and Coalition Theater. The mission is carried out by multiple tasks that are used to ensure Naval Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I), Surveillance, and Information Warfare components are effectively integrated into the C4ISR architecture. The Project additionally ensures that (1) the composite operational capabilities of the individual component systems conform to the C4ISR as related to the objectives of National Defense Strategy and evolving joint visions and direction, such as COPERNICUS...Forward", "Forward...From the Sea" and C4I For the Warrior, the Defense Science Board Summer Study Task Force on Information Architecture for the Battlefield. This effort is guided by CINC requirements; and (2) the need to integrate leading-edge information processing technologies primarily through the use of government and commercial off-the-shelf (COTS/GOTS) products to enhance the Navy's operational capability, interoperability, flexible reconfiguration, as well as reduce costs. C4ISR architectures support the following activities in achieving a fully integrated, interoperable Naval C4I system: identify technology developments that can be brought to bear to meet and validate C4ISR operational objectives, address prioritized CINC issues; integrate Naval C4I system developments, including developments from other services and commercially developed products in support of Joint Warfare Interoperability Demonstrations (JWID); develop interface and connectivity standards based architectures to support the enhanced operational capabilities in support of the C4ISR architectures; extract lessons learned for feedback from research, development, and acquisition programs to support further C4ISR architecture development efforts or more extensive implementation. This effort also performs high-level systems architecture/engineering to support long-range planning for COPERNICUS...Forward", C4I For the Warrior, Theater Battle Management (in conjunction with the Air Force), Digitization of the Battlefield (in conjunction with the Army), Theater Ballistic Missile Defense, Mine Warfare, Amphibious Warfare integration into C4ISR, the Defense Information infrastructure (DII) and coalition force architectures; as well as technical architecture/engineering to support C4I Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) joint technical architecture initiatives.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
I. (U) ($966) Developed plans for the integration of maturing system developments, and military and commercial technologies that support Copernicus...Forward concept into the annual Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration (JWID). Plans incorporate the use of enhanced operational capabilities in key CINC priority areas and Joint Mission Area (JMA) Assessment Thrust Areas including high capacity communications, improved Command and Control Warfare (C2W), integrated land fight architecture, trusted systems/multi-level security, improved sensors/strike planning, common tactical/operational picture, theater air defense/force protection, and combat identification.
II. (U) ($1,825) Developed a Mine Warfare Operational and Systems Architecture based on the multi-tier architecture framework of Operational, System and Technical, to support Naval missions in a Joint and Coalition Theater. Architectural development consisted of (1) assisting OPNAV, Navy Doctrine Command, and Fleet Commanders in the development of Operational Architectures and maintain documentation describing these Operational Architectures; (2) defining System Architecture parameters, attributes, and characteristics necessary to ensure that Program Executives and Managers acquire systems that achieve the desired operational objectives; and (3) defining the appropriate Technical Architectural standards and interfaces to achieve fully interoperable systems.
An additional $250K is available due to low expenditures to forward finance FY 1997 requirements.
III. (U) ($770) Developed a high-level systems architecture/engineering process to support long range planning for COPERNICUS...Forward", C4I for the Warrior, Joint Air Operations Functional Process Improvement, Theater Battle Management (in conjunction with the Air Force), Digitization of the Battlefield (with the Army), Theater Ballistic Missile Defense, Mine Warfare, Amphibious Warfare and integration into the DII. Extracted lessons learned for feedback to research, development, and acquisition programs to support further architectural developments. Participated in Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and joint architectural working groups and panels.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
IV. (U) ($941) The U.S. Navy is the lead service for planning, coordination and execution of FY-97's Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration (JWID). As lead service, coordinate all participation and develop plans for the integration of maturing system developments, military and commercial technologies that support enhanced operational capability in key Department of Defense (DOD) priority areas and Joint Mission Area (JMA) Assessment Thrust Areas. These include high capacity communications, improved Command and Control Warfare (C2W), integrated landfight architecture, trusted systems/multi-level security, improved sensors/strike planning, common tactical/operational picture, theater air defense/force protection, and combat identification.
V. (U) ($1,817) Continue to develop and validate a Naval C4ISR Architecture based the multi-tier architecture framework of Operational, System and Technical, to support Naval missions in a Joint and Coalition Theater. Architectural development will consist of (1) assisting OPNAV, Navy Doctrine Command, and Fleet Commanders in the development of Operation Architectures for Amphibious and Strike Warfare, and maintain documentation describing these Operational Architectures; (2) defining System Architecture parameters, attributes, and characteristics necessary to ensure that Program Executives and Managers acquire systems that achieve the desired operational objectives; and (3) defining the appropriate Technical Architectural standards and interfaces to achieve fully interoperable systems. Participate with the Joint Battle Center and Naval Battle Laboratories to verify and validate operational and system architectures. The Amphibious Warfare and Strike Warfare operational and systems architectures will be completed. Theater Air Defense architectures will be updated. Develop joint technical architecture in cooperation with other services. An additional $250K from FY-96 is available due to low expenditures to forward finance FY 1998 requirements.
VI. (U) ($778) Develop high-level systems and operational architecture processes to support long range planning for COPERNICUS...Forward", C4I for the Warrior, Joint Air Operations Functional Process Improvement, Theater Battle Management (in conjunction with the Air Force), Digitization of the Battlefield (with the Army), Theater Ballistic Missile Defense, Amphibious Warfare, Strike Warfare and integration into the DII. Extract lessons learned for feedback to research, development, and acquisition programs to support further architecture development efforts. An integrated C4ISR systems architecture, integrated node list, and hierarchical data dictionary will be completed. Participate in OSD and joint architectural working groups and panels.
VII. (U) ($47K) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C.638.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
VIII. (U) ($1,000) Develop plans for the integration of maturing system developments, military and commercial technologies that support enhanced operational capabilities in key CINC priority areas and Joint Mission Area (JMA) Assessment Thrust Areas into the annual Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration (JWID). Integration plans will include high capacity communications, improved Command and Control Warfare (C2W), integrated landfight architecture, trusted systems/multi-level security, improved sensors/strike planning, common operational picture, collaborative planning, knowledge based systems, smart push-warrior pull data flow, theater air defense/force protection, and combat identification.
IX. (U) ($1,738) Continue to develop and validate a Naval C4ISR Architecture based the multi-tier architecture framework of Operational, System and Technical, to support Naval missions in a Joint and Coalition Theater. Architectural development will consist of (1) assisting OPNAV, Navy Doctrine Command, and Fleet Commanders in the continuing upgrade of Operation Architectures and maintain documentation describing the Operational Architectures; (2) provide system architecture parameters, attributes, and characteristics necessary to ensure that Program Executives and Managers acquire systems that achieve the desired operational objectives. Participate with the Joint Battle Center and Naval Battle Laboratories to verify and validate operational and system architectures. The Amphibious systems architecture will be completed. Previously delivered operational architectures will be updated. This program was reduced $250K as a result of low FY 1996 expenditures.
X. (U) ($350) Develop the high-level systems and operational architecture processes to include long range planning for COPERNICUS...Forward", C4I for the Warrior, Joint Air Operations Functional Process Improvement, Theater Battle Management (in conjunction with the Air Force), Digitization of the Battlefield (with the Army), Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) C4I and integration into the DII. An updated integrated C4ISR systems architecture, integrated node list, information exchange requirements and hierarchical data dictionary will be provided. Participate in OSD and joint architectural working groups and panels.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
XI. (U) ($1,000) Develop plans for the integration of maturing system developments, military and commercial technologies that support enhanced operational capabilities in key CINC priority areas and Joint Mission Area (JMA) Assessment Thrust Areas into the annual Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration (JWID). Integration plans will include high capacity communications, improved Command and Control Warfare (C2W), integrated landfight architecture, trusted systems/multi-level security, improved sensors/strike planning, common operational picture, collaborative planning, knowledge based systems, smart push-warrior pull data flow, theater air defense/force protection, and combat identification.
XII. (U) ($3,100) Continue to develop and validate a Naval C4ISR Architecture based the multi-tier architecture framework of Operational, System and Technical, to support Naval missions in a Joint and Coalition Theater. Architectural development will consist of (1) assisting OPNAV, Navy Doctrine Command, and Fleet Commanders in the development of operation and overarching architectures and maintain documentation describing the Operational Architectures; (2) provide system architecture parameters, attributes, and characteristics necessary to ensure that Program Executives and Managers acquire systems that achieve the desired operational objectives. Participate with the Joint Battle Center and Naval Battle Laboratories to verify and validate operational and system architectures. Three additional systems architectures will be completed. Amphibious Warfare operational architecture will be updated.
(U) ($740) Update the high-level systems and operational architecture processes to support long range planning for COPERNICUS...Forward", C4I for the Warrior, Joint Air Operations Functional Process Improvement, Theater Battle Management (in conjunction with the Air Force), Digitization of the Battlefield (with the Army), Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) C4I architectures. An updated information exchange requirement list, integrated node list, and hierarchical data dictionary will be completed. Participate in OSD and joint architectural working groups and panels.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET: 3,623 3,768 3,904 4,911
(U) ADJUSTMENTS FROM FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -62 -185 -816 -71
(U) FY 1998 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET SUBMIT: 3,561 3,583 3,088 4,840
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
FY 1996: Change reflects decreases of $4K for the Jordan Rescission; $9K decrease for Administrative and Personal Services rescission; and $49K decrease for SBIR.
FY 1997: Change reflects a decrease of $185K for Congressional undistributed general adjustments.
FY 1998: Change reflects a decrease of $56K for NWCF adjustments; decrease of $2K for minor Navy POM decision; $250K decrease for poor expenditure performance in FY96; $500K decrease for C4I program reduction; and $8K decrease for inflation.
FY 1999: Change reflects a decrease of $43K for NWCF adjustments; $11K decrease for a minor Navy POM decision; and $17K decrease for inflation.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: (SEW) Architecture/Engineering Support program element relates to all Naval C4I related efforts.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)
Project Cost Categories FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
a. SEW/C4I Technology Integration 770 778 350 740
b. Systems Architecture and Engineering 1,825 1,852 1,738 3,100
c. Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstrations 966 953 1,000 1,000
Total 3,561 3,583 3,088 4,840
B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION: ($ in thousands)
PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS
| Contractor/Government Performing Activity | Contract Method/Fund Type Vehicle | Award/Oblig Date | Perform Activity EAC | Project Office EAC | Total FY 1995 & Prior | FY 1996 Budget | FY 1997 Budget | FY 1997 Budget | FY 1998 Budget | To Complete | Total Program |
Product Development:
Various N/A Cont. Cont. 6,962 3,561 3,583 3,088 4,840 Cont.
Support and Management: N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test and Evaluation: N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: None
| FY 1995 & Prior | FY 1996 ACTUAL | FY 1997 ESTIMATE | FY 1998 ESTIMATE | FY 1999 ESTIMATE | TO COMPLETE | TOTAL PROGRAM |
Subtotal Product Development 6,962 3,561 3,583 3,088 4,840 Cont. Cont.
Subtotal Support and Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal Test and Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Project: 6,962 3,561 3,583 3,088 4,840 Cont. Cont.