Most people are not going to read a book-length study of nuclear weapons command and control, and they shouldn’t have to. But those who need a quick sketch — whether they are reporters, students, or regular citizens — can now find a concise, two-page introduction to the topic from the Congressional Research Service. See Defense Primer: Command and Control of Nuclear Forces, CRS In Focus, December 1, 2016.
This document is part of a series of some three dozen “defense primers” that were prepared lately by CRS for new members of Congress in order to explain “key aspects of the Department of Defense and how Congress exercises authority over it.” The reports can serve the same purpose for interested members of the public.
The CRS primers naturally will not turn readers into experts. But they generally do an excellent job of presenting complex or obscure matters in clear language that almost anyone can understand, while identifying key policy issues, and introducing the essential vocabulary used to address them. The fact that CRS has no particular institutional stake in those issues enhances the credibility of the reports and makes them useful to readers of any persuasion, and to those who don’t yet know what to think.
Among the titles in the series are these:
Defense Primer: Intelligence Support to Military Operations, CRS In Focus, December 30, 2016
Defense Primer: Organization of U.S. Ground Forces, CRS In Focus, December 29, 2016
Defense Primer: Commanding U.S. Military Operations, CRS In Focus, December 13, 2016
Defense Primer: Ballistic Missile Defense, CRS In Focus, December 12, 2016
Defense Primer: Cyberspace Operations, CRS In Focus, December 8, 2016
Defense Primer: Legal Authorities for the Use of Military Forces, CRS In Focus, December 7, 2016
Defense Primer: Congress’s Constitutional Authority with Regard to the Armed Forces, CRS In Focus, December 7, 2016
Defense Primer: Budgeting for National and Defense Intelligence, CRS In Focus, December 5, 2016
Defense Primer: The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), CRS In Focus, November 16, 2016
Defense Primer: Geography, Strategy, and U.S. Force Design, CRS In Focus, October 14, 2016
Every report in the CRS defense primer series is available on the FAS website here.
Science funding agencies are biased against risk, making transformative research difficult to fund. Forecast-based approaches to grantmaking could improve funding outcomes for high-risk, high-reward research.
Establishing an NIH Office of Infection-Associated Chronic Illness Research can guard against the long-term effects of Covid and lead to novel breakthroughs across many less understood diseases.
A military depot in central Belarus has recently been upgraded with additional security perimeters and an access point that indicate it could be intended for housing Russian nuclear warheads for Belarus’ Russia-supplied Iskander missile launchers.
With a PhD in materials science, a postdoc position at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and a stint as a AAAS Fellow, Dr. Shawn Chen has had a range of roles in the research community.