| COST ($ In Thousands) | FY 1996 Actual | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | FY 2002 Estimate | FY 2003 Estimate | Cost to Complete | Total Cost | |
| 0006 | EELV Dem/Val | 36,894 | 42,333 | 63,260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 172,533 |
| Quantity of RDT&E Articles | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
The Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program is a space launch system development program. The purpose of this program is to replace the current fleet
of medium to heavy-lift class expendable launch vehicles (Titan II, Delta II, Atlas II, and Titan IV) with a more affordable family of space launch vehicles. With a
nonrecurring development cost of $2 billion, EELV is projected to save 25-50 percent over the current fleet of expendable launch vehicles during a 20 year period.
Program content includes the development of the system design, demonstrations of key technologies, modifications to industrial capability and launch facilities, and
demonstration launches of both medium- and heavy-lift EELV variants. The EELV family of vehicles must be capable of meeting the Government's spacelift needs
(DoD, intelligence, and other government missions) through at least 2020, as defined in the National Mission Model. The first operational launch for the Medium-Lift
Variant (MLV) is required by FY02 to support satellite block changes and transitions. The first operational capability for the Heavy-Lift Variant (HLV) is required by
FY05 to maintain assured access to space following the Titan IV phaseout. This program is in Budget Activity 4, Demonstration and Validation, because it supports risk
reduction, demonstration and validation of technologies, and concept verifications leading to lower cost expendable launch vehicles.
(U) Acquisition Strategy:
The EELV concept of a family of launch vehicles emphasizes commonality of hardware and infrastructure and economies of scale to enhance production, operations,
and support efficiencies. Cost improvements will be achieved through commonality, consolidation, reduction of supporting infrastructure (launch pads, manufacturing
facilities, workforce), and optimization of production and launch operations, processes, and rates. Development contracts will be competitively awarded. Downselect to
a single EELV contract/concept is planned at the EMD decision point (third quarter FY98). Production contracts will be sole source to the EELV EMD contractor.
(U) FY 1996
| (U) $32,000 | Completed four Low Cost Concept Validation (LCCV) contracts culminating in the Dec 96 downselect to two Pre-EMD contracts to continue concept development. |
| (U) $4,894 | Program management and other support costs. |
| (U) $36,894 | Total |
(U) FY 1997
| (U) $38,854 | Awarded two $60M, FFP, Pre-EMD contracts in Dec 96. Pre-EMD contracts will span 17 months. |
| (U) $3,479 | Program management and other support costs. |
| (U) $42,333 | Total |
(U) FY 1998
| (U) $56,900 | Complete two $60 million, firm fixed price, Pre-EMD contracts in May 98. |
| (U) $6,360 | Program management and other support costs. |
| (U) $0 | Downselect to single EMD contractor. EMD begins in June 98 funded under PE 0604853F. |
| (U) $63,260 | Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 37,147 | 44,457 | ||
| (U) Appropriated Value | 39,226 | 44,457 | ||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | ||||
| a. Congressional General Reductions | -916 | -1,003 | ||
| b. Small Business Innovative Research | -605 | -1,121 | ||
| c. Omnibus or other above threshold reprogramming | -799 | |||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | -12 | |||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97 PB | +63,260 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 36,894 | 42,333 | 63,260 |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
- Funding: The FY96 reductions were for general Congressional reductions and an additional $0.811M reduction to support higher military requirements. FY97 reductions were the result of general Congressional Reductions. FY98 funds were transferred from PE 0604853F (EELV EMD) to reflect the approved schedule for the pre-EMD phase. The pre-EMD phase will run from December 1996 to May 1998. The change is required to implement the approved acquisition strategy as documented in the Single Acquisition Management Plan (SAMP).
- Schedule: Not Applicable.
- Technical: Not Applicable.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 | To Comp | Total |
| (U) National User (non-AF budget) | 72,300 | 18,600 | 7,100 | 0 | 98,000 | |||||
| (U) Missile Procurement, AF (PE 030593F) | 245,428 | 285,471 | 171,951 | 303,782 | Cont. | Cont. | ||||
| Related RDT&E | ||||||||||
| (U) EELV EMD (PE 0604853F) | 28,376 | 293,950 | 324,891 | 232,991 | 256,797 | 419,280 | 162,200 | 1,718,485 | ||
| (U) EELV (PE 0305953F) | 3,383 | 3,480 | 3,577 | 2,398 | 795 | Cont. | Cont. | |||
| (U) Medium Launch Vehicles (PE 0305119F) | ||||||||||
| (U) Titan Space Launch Vehicles (PE 0305144F) |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| LCCV Module | ||||||||||||||||
| (U) Tailored Preliminary Design Review | X | |||||||||||||||
| (U) DAB | X | |||||||||||||||
| (U) Downselect to two contracts | X | |||||||||||||||
| Pre-EMD Module | ||||||||||||||||
| (U) Pre-EMD contract awards | X | |||||||||||||||
| (U) Downselect Design Review | X | |||||||||||||||
| (U) EMD DAB | X | |||||||||||||||
| (U) Downselect to single EMD contract/concept | X |
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | |
| (U) Concept Development Contracts | 32,000 | 38,854 | 56,900 | 0 |
| (U) Program management and other support costs | 4,894 | 3,479 | 6,360 | 0 |
| (U) Total | 36,894 | 42,333 | 63,260 | 0 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)*
* Does not include ARPA FY94 funding of $9,800 and National User funds: FY96 - $72,300, FY97 - $18,600, FY98 - $7,100. Information represents Air Force funding
Performing Organizations:
| Contractor or
Government
Performing
Activity |
Contract
Method/Type or
Funding
Vehicle |
Award or Obligation Date |
Performing Activity EAC |
Project Office EAC |
Total
|
Budget
|
Budget FY 1997 |
Budget
|
Budget
|
Budget to Complete |
Total Program |
| Product Development Organizations |
| Alliant Tech | C/FFP (LCCV) | Aug 95 | 13,000 | 13,000 | 5,000 | 8,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,000 |
| Boeing | C/FFP (LCCV) | Aug 95 | 13,000 | 13,000 | 5,000 | 8,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,000 |
| Lockheed Martin | C/FFP (LCCV) | Aug 95 | 13,000 | 13,000 | 5,000 | 8,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,000 |
| McDonnell Douglas | C/FFP (LCCV) | Aug 95 | 13,000 | 13,000 | 5,000 | 8,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,000 |
| Lockheed Martin | C/FFP (Pre-EMD) | Dec 96 | 47,877 | 47,877 | 0 | 0 | 19,427 | 28,450 | 0 | 0 | 47,877 |
| McDonnell Douglas | C/FFP (Pre-EMD) | Dec 96 | 47,877 | 47,877 | 0 | 0 | 19,427 | 28,450 | 0 | 0 | 47,877 |
|
Support and Management Organizations |
| SPO Mission Spt | Various | Various | N/A | N/A | 852 | 2,069 | 2,127 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 6,724 |
| FFRDC | CPAF | FY95 | N/A | N/A | 1,329 | 1,803 | 255 | 3,833 | 0 | 0 | 7,220 |
| Ranges | Various | Various | N/A | N/A | 7,255 | 211 | 226 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 7,802 |
| Other Cntr Spt | Various | Various | N/A | N/A | 610 | 811 | 871 | 741 | 0 | 0 | 3,033 |
|
Test and Evaluation Organizations |
| Not Applicable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)
Government Furnished Property: Not Applicable
| Subtotal Product Development | 20,000 | 32,000 | 38,854 | 56,900 | 0 | 0 | 147,754 |
| Subtotal Support and Management | 10,046 | 4,894 | 3,479 | 6,360 | 0 | 0 | 24,779 |
| Subtotal Test and Evaluation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Project | 30,046 | 36,894 | 42,333 | 63,260 | 0 | 0 | 172,533 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK