Skip to navigation Skip to content
ReallyReady America | ReallyReady Business | ReallyReady Disabilities
Homegeneral navigation

CLICK HERE to see local information.

Click Here for local information or use the menu below.


Analysis of

The Department of Homeland Security released its citizen preparedness website,, in February 2003 and completed a large-scale update in July 2006. The Federation of American Scientists compared the new site to an archive of the previous version and carefully evaluated the content for accuracy, completeness, comprehensibility, and applicability.

This analysis exposes numerous inadequacies in The Federation of American Scientists recommends that the information on be updated as soon as possible with the assistance of scientific, military, and emergency response experts.

The following is an overview of the analysis.
Download the full analysis. (pdf PDF, 4.5MB) (.doc, 5.8MB)


We found incorrect information throughout the site in addition to several other common problems, including:

These problems were identified on many pages, particularly:

These issues were still present after the July 2006 update of, although valuable information was added including:

  • Information for seniors and pet owners
  • More state and local information
  • Summaries of information for twelve natural disasters
  • Changes to color and layout, making the site significantly easier to navigate

Generic Advice

  • Many recommendations provided by the Ready campaign guidelines are not applicable to specific scenarios.

For example:

Example of generic advice

from Deciding to Stay or Go [D]

  • These instructions are useful but do not tell you when creating a barrier between yourself and contaminated air would be the best decision: sheltering in place is not effective for nuclear or indoor chemical attacks. 

Unnecessarily Lengthy Descriptions

  • Unnecessarily lengthy descriptions make informed decision making difficult.
  • Many pages could be greatly condensed, for example:

Screenshot from showing lengthy descriptionfrom Clean Air [D]

After one or two lines, it becomes difficult to focus on and remember the information, especially when reading it from a computer screen.  Below is the same information, modified for the internet:

  • Snugly cover your nose and mouth with a face mask, available in any hardware store (an N95 rating is best)
  • Make the best fit possible for both children and adults to ensure that air comes through the mask or cloth and not around it
  • It is also important to protect your eyes and cuts in your skin
  • You may need to improvise with anything that fits your face snugly, such as dense-weave cotton material
  • Something over your nose and mouth in an emergency is better than nothing

This format is easier to skim and easier to remember.

Repetitive Details

  • Multiple pages contain the same information verbatim, making it  hard to determine where and in what order to look.

For example:

Screenshots showing repetitive information on Emergency Planning for Employees and Involve Co-Workers [D]

Disabled and Special Needs

If planning does not embrace the value that everyone should survive, they will not. - National Council on Disability

see archived "Disabled and Special Needs" page

There are only twenty-one lines of  generic information describing how to prepare for an emergency if you are disabled. 

  • Questions like these are not answered:
    • How do you plan to evacuate a multi-story building in an emergency if you have a mobility disability?
    •  How will you know to evacuate a building if you are unable to hear an alarm?
  • The same amount of information available for preparing your pet for an emergency is available for preparing yourself and your family if you have a disability:

screenshots from showing how there is equivalent information for people with disabilities and petsfrom Disabled and Special Needs and Pet Items [D]

  • Specific information and instructions catered to special needs, including how to create a support network to help in an emergency or what special considerations to make when developing evacuation plans, is necessary for adequate preparation. 
  • The Department of Homeland Security has made invalid claims that this kind of detailed information is accessible. 
    • In 2004 and 2006, DHS announced that had new and updated information for individuals with disabilities
    • This is a misleading claim: a comparison of a 2003 archive of and the new page indicates that the only updated information related to individuals with disabilities is a single link at the bottom of the page
  • It is important to ensure that equivalent information is available for individuals with disabilities since 19.3% of the American population over 5 has a disability.

Biological Threat

see archived "Biological Threat" page

Chemical Threat

see archived "Chemical Threat" page

  • The following advice is incorrect: If you can't get out of the building [under chemical attack] or find clean air without passing through the area where you see signs of a chemical attack, it may be better to move as far away as possible and shelter-in-place.'"
    • This response is appropriate for outdoor chemical attacks, but not for chemical attacks inside. Sealing a room and sheltering-in-place could trap you with poisonous chemicals.
  • Other advice in this section is misleading, such as many sick or dead birds, fish or small animals are also cause for suspicion, which could cause needless alarm since it is not uncommon to see a dead animal. 
  • The page also instructs: quickly try to define the impacted area or where the chemical is coming from, if possible. This is confusing advice that undermines the urgency in responding to a chemical attack.
    • It is not essential to define the impacted area when the most important thing is to find clean air as quickly as possible, which does effectively emphasize.
  • This advice is both confusing and inaccurate: If you are outside, quickly decide what is the fastest way to find clean air. Consider if you can get out of the area or if you should go inside the closest building and shelter-in-place.
    • Attempting to get away from a chemical cloud could take you into harms way, since it may be impossible to determine the direction the cloud is moving.

Influenza Pandemic

see archived "Influenza Pandemic" page

  • There should be specific details about how to respond, including answers to questions like: Should you expect to stay at home?, Should you go out and purchase masks?, and Is a vaccine available?.
  • Phrases like the federal government, states, communities, and industry are taking steps to prepare for and respond to an influenza pandemic do not describe a pandemic flu and how an individual or business can act to prepare for it.

Nuclear Threat

see archived "Nuclear Threat" page

  • instructs concerned citizens to Take cover immediately, as far below ground as possible, though any shield or shelter will help protect you from the immediate effects of the blast and the pressure wave
    • An individual likely wont have sufficient time to do this.
  • This page undermines the urgency of the situation and leaves it to an individual to consider if you can get out of the area; or if it would be better to go inside a building and follow your plan to shelter-in-place.'"
  • The visual guide for nuclear attacks understates the effects of a nuclear bomb, which would have a radius of destruction of at least a mile.  A graphic, shown below, depicts you are here next to a nuclear blast, and recommends running around the corner. 

Nuclear escape graphic- go around the corner if there is a blast

from Nuclear Threat

  • The first piece of advice given in the guidelines instructs quickly assess the situation, which could be replaced by a more useful recommendation, since an individual who sees a mile or more of their downtown disappear will automatically assess their surroundings.

Radiation Threat

see archived "Radiation Threat" page

  • recommends, If you are already inside check to see if your building has been damaged. If your building is stable, stay where you are.
  • Later on the same page, instructs citizens to think about shielding, distance, and time, where the farther away from the blast you are, the lower your exposure. 
  • This advice is contradictory and based on emergency response for laboratories handling radioactive materials. In an attack situation, the most important thing to do is avoid radioactive dust.