INDEX


                                 CHAPTER VII

                             PERFORMANCE TESTING

1.  PERFORMANCE TESTS.  Performance tests shall be used to realistically
    evaluate, and verify the effectiveness of protective force programs;
    identify and provide training for personnel; identify areas requiring
    system improvements; validate implemented improvements; and motivate
    protective force personnel.  Such tests shall adhere to the policy and
    requirements found in DOE 5630.16A, SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY ACCEPTANCE
    AND VALIDATION TEST PROGRAM.  All major functions of the protective
    force shall be tested.  The following are the major types of protective
    force tests:

    a.   Limited Scope Performance Test.  Limited Scope Performance Tests
         may be either scheduled or unannounced.  They may be used to
         determine the level of protective force skill or capability in the
         area tested or to verify different aspects of the protective force
         program.  They may be conducted to realistically test any operation
         or procedure, verify a policy requirement, or to verify possession
         of a requisite knowledge or skill to perform a specific task that
         falls within the scope of protective force responsibility.  The
         tests may involve large numbers of protective force personnel
         working together, or they may involve only individuals or small
         teams.  When individuals or small teams are tested, repetitions of
         the test may be conducted with each individual or team.  Examples
         of these tests include individual and team tactical movement,
         defensive and offensive positioning, arrest and control techniques,
         building clearing, handling civil disturbances, containment
         operations, command and control activities, or any individual
         components of these activities.  Any element of protective force
         responsibility, as determined by site procedures and job task
         analysis, may be tested.

    b.   Alarm Response and Assessment Performance Test.  An Alarm Response
         and Assessment Performance Test is a no prior notice test to
         evaluate on-duty protective force response to a specific location
         under safeguards and security alarm protection.  Test scenarios
         shall be based on simulated adversary actions consistent with the
         Design Basis Threat Policy and vulnerability analyses.  The purpose
         of these tests is to evaluate protective force readiness and
         response to an alarm condition.  These tests shall take into
         consideration all aspects of the response, including
         communications, personal protective measures, equipment
         availability and serviceability, and any protective force and
         facility coordination activities that may be necessary for
         effective mitigation of an event.  The tests shall be
         pre-coordinated with facility representatives and trusted agents to
         ensure that safety requirements are fulfilled, security is not
         compromised, and operational disruption is minimized.  Upon
         commencement of a test, responding protective force personnel shall
         be advised of the test.  Handguns shall not be unholstered and
         auxiliary weapons shall not have a round chambered.

    c.   Force-on-Force Exercise.  A force-on-force exercise is a major test
         of the overall effectiveness of all elements involved in response
         to a Design Basis Threat and site-specific threats.  These tests
         shall be held at all facilities meeting the requirements listed in
         paragraph 8a, page 4.  Exercises shall be pre-planned, announced in
         advance to all participating parties, and conducted during
         specified time periods (exercise windows).  Personnel shall be
         designated and briefed in advance to act as adversaries.  All
         weapons shall be unloaded, and simulated weapons systems shall be
         used.  For this reason, when an exercise involves an operating
         facility as opposed to a test area, a "shadow force" of protective
         force personnel shall be deployed for protection of the security
         interest.  Interface procedures to include rules of conduct for all
         participants, controller actions, exercise boundaries, and
         off-limit areas shall be developed.  In addition, communication
         procedures shall be developed between the simulated and shadow
         forces to ensure no compromise of safeguards and security during
         the exercise.

    d.   Command Post Exercise.   A command post exercise is conducted to
         observe and evaluate a crisis management team's overall handling of
         a simulated safeguards and/or security emergency.  The exercise may
         involve a local Emergency Operations Center or multiple centers to
         include the DOE Emergency Operations Center.  Exercises may be
         announced or unannounced, and may vary in scope and time as
         dictated by the purpose of the exercise.  A security command post
         exercise shall be based upon the "Design Basis Threat Policy for
         Department of Energy (DOE) Programs and Facilities (U)" and the
         site-specific threat.  The exercise will be used to evaluate both
         tactical and technical assessments and decisions.  Lines of
         authority, the interrelationship of various organizational
         components in crisis mitigation, and the timeliness of reporting
         and decisionmaking will be considered in the overall evaluation.
         Facility and equipment availability will also be evaluated.

    e.   Command Field Exercise.  A command field exercise is an extension
         of a command post exercise and is conducted to test the
         interrelationship of site managers in directing the tactical
         engagement of a protective force to a simulated emergency.
         Procedures, tactical intelligence, communications, logistics, and
         field and site support systems' interfaces are the focus of a
         command field exercise.  Such exercises are pre-planned and
         announced in advance to all participating personnel.  They may be
         combined with force-on-force exercises.

    f.   Joint Training Exercises.  When site or facility vulnerability
         analysis and performance testing indicates a need for outside
         agency support for the successful mitigation of a safeguards and
         security incident, the support anticipated from outside agencies
         shall be covered, where possible, by a formal, written Memorandum
         of Agreement.  Such support shall be tested annually by a joint
         training exercise, where possible.  The frequency of testing of
         outside resources shall be based upon the degree of support
         anticipated and shall be approved by the cognizant local
         Departmental authority for safeguards and security.

2.  TEST PLAN.  A written test plan shall be prepared for protective force
    performance testing activities.  The plan shall consider and include, as
    appropriate:

    a.   The specific element of the protective force being tested;

    b.   The objective of the test;

    c.   Applicable pass/fail criteria;

    d.   Specific safety considerations;

    e.   Specific safeguards and security considerations;

    f.   Test results documentation and after action reviews; and

    g.   Classification of the proposed test and anticipated results, as
         appropriate.

3.  SAFETY.  Protective force performance tests shall be conducted with the
    highest regard for the safety and health of personnel, protection of the
    environment, and protection of Government property.  Specific safety
    considerations and requirements for conducting protective force
    performance tests are found in DOE 5480.16, FIREARMS SAFETY.

4.  COORDINATION.  When the protective force command post exercise and
    command field exercise performance tests involve demonstrations of
    site-level emergency response capabilities, the development and conduct
    of the exercise should be coordinated with the appropriate site-level
    emergency management organizations.

5.  TESTING FREQUENCY.  Performance testing shall be conducted as outlined
    in Figure VII-1.

============================================================================
|              TYPE OF EXERCISE                  | MINIMUM TEST FREQUENCY  |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Limited Scope Performance Test                 | AS REQUIRED             |
| Alarm Response and Assessment Performance Test | 2/YEAR/ALARMED LOCATION |
| Force-On-Force Exercise                        | 1/YEAR/FACILITY         |
| Command Post Exercise                          | 1/YEAR/SITE             |
| Command Field Exercise                         | 1/YEAR/SITE             |
| Joint Training Exercise                        | AS REQUIRED             |
|________________________________________________|_________________________|
                               Figure VII-1

    NOTE:  Annual requirements for Force-On-Force Exercise, Command Post
    Exercise, and Command Field Exercise may be combined where determined
    appropriate in Site Safeguards and Security Plans.  Requirements for
    Alarm Response and Assessment Performance Tests may also be satisfied
    through combined testing of multiple alarms in the same or proximate
    location(s).