Statement by the PresidentStatement by President Clinton on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Rose Garden, The White House, Washington, DC, July 20, 1999
I have just had the privilege of meeting with the three Apollo 11 astronauts, who, 30 years ago, carried out the first landing on the moon: Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins. They and everyone at NASA over the years have made an extraordinary contribution to our nation and to humanity. I am very grateful to them.
President Kennedy, who set a goal of putting a man on the moon by the late 1960s, was committed to using technology to unlock the mysteries of the heaven. But President Kennedy was also concerned that technology, if misused, literally could destroy life on Earth. So another goal he vigorously pursued was one first proposed by President Eisenhower, a treaty to ban for all time testing of the most destructive weapons ever devised -- nuclear weapons.
As a first step, President Kennedy negotiated a limited test ban treaty to ban nuclear tests except those conducted underground. But for far too long nations failed to heed he call to ban all nuclear tests. More countries sought to acquire nuclear weapons and to develop ever more destructive weapons. This threatened America's security and that of our friends and allies. It made the world a more dangerous place.
Since I have been President, I have made ending nuclear tests one of my top goals. And in 1996, we concluded a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty -- 152 countries have now signed it, and 41, including many of our allies, have now ratified it. Today on Capitol Hill, a bipartisan group of senators is speaking out on the importance of the treaty. They include Senators Jeffords, Specter, Daschle, Biden, Bingaman, Dorgan, Bob Kerrey, Levin, and Murray. I am grateful for their leadership and their support of this critical agreement.
And today I want to express again my strong determination to obtain ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. America already has stopped nuclear testing. We have, today, a robust nuclear force and nuclear experts affirm that we can maintain a safe and reliable deterrent without nuclear tests.
The question now is whether we will adopt or whether we will lose a
verifiable treaty that will bar other nations from testing nuclear weapons.
The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty will strengthen our national security
|With or without a test ban treaty, we must monitor
such activities. The treaty gives us new means to pursue this important
mission -- a global network of sensors and the right to request short notice,
on-sight inspections in other countries. Four former
Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff -- David Jones, William Crowe, Colin
Powell and John Shalikashvili -- plus the current Chairman, Hugh Shelton,
all agree the treaty is in our national interests. Other national
leaders, such as former Senators John Glenn and Nancy Kassebaum Baker,
Unfortunately, the Test Ban Treaty is now imperiled by the refusal of some senators even to consider it. If our Senate fails to act, the treaty cannot enter into force for any country.
Think of that. We're not testing now. One hundred and fifty-two countries have signed, 41 have ratified, but if our Senate fails to act, this treaty and all the protections and increased safety it offers the American people cannot enter into force for any country. That would make it harder to prevent further nuclear arms competition, and as we have seen, for example, in the nuclear tests in India and Pakistan.
|Do we want these countries and other regional
rivals to join a test ban treaty, or do we want them to stop nuclear testing?
Do we want to scrap a treaty that could constrain
The major nuclear powers, Britain and France, Russia and China, have signed the treaty. Do we want to walk away from a treaty under which those countries and scores of others have agreed not to conduct nuclear tests? I believe it is strongly in our interest to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
The American people consistently have supported it for more than 40
years now. At a minimum, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee should
hold hearings this
I thank those senators from both parties who today are announcing their clear intention not to do that. Thank you.
|Produced by the White House Working Group on the Comprehensive Test
For more information on the CTBT, log on to www.state.gov/www/global/arms/index.html