News

DATE=12/6/1999 TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT TITLE=IRAQ/WEAPONS INSPECTIONS (L) NUMBER=2-256901 BYLINE=NICK SIMEONE DATELINE=WASHINGTON CONTENT= VOICED AT: INTRO: The deputy head of the United Nations Special Commission on Iraq says Baghdad may succeed in preventing U-N arms inspectors from ever returning to the country and finishing the task of declaring Iraq free of weapons of mass destruction. Correspondent Nick Simeone reports Baghdad wants a decade of U-N- imposed sanctions lifted before allowing weapons inspectors to return. TEXT: No weapons inspections have been conducted in Iraq in nearly a year, and they may never resume if President Saddam Hussein's government and the U-N Security Council cannot agree on a formula allowing weapons experts to return. Charles Duelfer is deputy chairman of UNSCOM, the U-N body charged with ensuring Iraq is disarmed. /// 1st DUELFER ACT /// There's now a standoff between Iraq and the Security Council on this and some other issues. It may well be that one concludes that the last part of this task is not able to be achieved. /// END ACT /// // OPT // All UNSCOM staff were withdrawn from Iraq a year ago when Baghdad refused to cooperate with weapons experts. That led to several days of bombing by American and British jets, and a hardened attitude by Iraq. Baghdad said it would not allow weapons inspections to resume until the lifting of sanctions, which were first imposed after its invasion of Kuwait in 1990. // END OPT // The Security Council is now struggling to find a formula that would get inspectors back on the job in exchange for a lifting of sanctions. State Department Spokesman Jim Foley: /// FOLEY ACT /// We believe discussions among the permanent five members in the Security Council have made a good deal of progress in recent weeks. We also believe that a Security Council vote on the omnibus draft is likely this week. /// END ACT /// Still, closing the file on Iraq may be no closer now than it has been over the past decade. UNSCOM's deputy chairman Charles Duelfer explains why: /// 2nd DUELFER ACT /// Well, a) to a put inspectors back, b) convince ourselves that Iraq has finally gotten rid of all these things, and c) sustain that level of ... intrusive monitoring to assure that Iraq does not reconstitute these programs. Those are very tough tasks, and you can only expect them to be implemented if there is an adequate consensus in the Council and the right set of carrots and sticks for Iraq to achieve these things. /// END ACT /// If there is no consensus, Iraq may succeed to some degree in its decade-long battle with the world, by exhausting all United Nations efforts to close the final chapter on what has been the most intrusive weapons inspection regime in modern history. (Signed) NEB/NJS/WTW 06-Dec-1999 17:03 PM EDT (06-Dec-1999 2203 UTC) NNNN Source: Voice of America .