News

Killing the Messenger =========Iraq Action Coalition ======== http://iraqaction.org/ To subscribe, send an e-mail to "majordomo@iraqaction.org" with 'subscribe iac-list' in the body of the message ======================================= November 2, 1999 The US and UK are trying to get rid of UN humanitarian aid coordinator for Iraq, Hans Von Sponeck, because he dares to speak the truth about the devastating effects of sanctions on the people of Iraq. (see story below) This disturbing and revelaing article from the Financial Times makes it clear what the US and British agenda is. Yesterday I was shocked to hear Carol Bellamy, the director of UNICEF which recently published a comprehensive report on child mortality in Iraq, bending over backwards to explain away the chilling findings and to excuse and rationalize the sanctions on Iraq. Bellamy was speaking on WBEZ's program Worldview, on November 1. You can hear the interview with Bellamy yourself at www.wbez.org (click on Schedules and Program, then Weekday Schedule, then Worldview, then Audio on Demand). Obviously the pressure on UN officials to keep silent or tow the line is immense. Let us hope that Von Sponeck has the principles, the stamina and the support to keep speaking the truth. Ali Abunimah ahabunim@midway.uchicago.edu ******************************************* Financial Times, November 2, 1999 World News / International US, Britain urge UN official in Iraq to quit By Roula Khalaf, Middle East Editor The US and Britain are pressing for the dismissal of Hans Von Sponeck, the United Nations humanitarian co-ordinator in Baghdad, according to senior western diplomats. The push to get rid of Mr Von Sponeck is driven by frustration with his public statements on the debilitating effects of the nine-year-old UN sanctions on Iraq. But Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, who has suffered his own share of criticism on his handling of Iraq from Washington and London, is resisting. He is believed to have told Mr Von Sponeck last weekend to stay in his job for another year. Senior western diplomats said yesterday the pressures being exercised on Mr Von Sponeck were similar to the events that led his predecessor, Denis Halliday, an Irish national, to leave the job in October 1998. Mr Halliday quit the UN altogether and now campaigns for a lifting of sanctions on Iraq. The US and UK have followed a policy that aims to maintain the sanctions on Iraq and to blame the effects of the embargo on the regime of President Saddam Hussein. They consider that UN officials who speak out against sanctions are playing into Mr Saddam's hands. US and British officials maintain Iraqis are not receiving enough food and medicine under the oil-for-food programme, which allows Iraq to sell $5.3bn of oil every six months to buy humanitarian goods, because the Iraqi government refuses to distribute the goods. But Mr Von Sponeck, a German who oversees implementation of oil-for-food, has spoken of the destruction of Iraqi society under sanctions. He has pointed out that, of all goods received by the end of August under the oil-for-food deal, 88.8 per cent had been distributed. He has echoed concerns expressed recently by Mr Annan, who sent a letter to the security council last week indirectly criticising the US for holding up approval of hundreds of contracts for humanitarian goods under oil-for-food. At a time when the UN security council is deadlocked on policy towards Iraq - and on whether sanctions should be lifted - Mr Von Sponeck has also been arguing that the UN should consider sanctions relief separately from disarmament issues. Under UN resolutions, sanctions can only be lifted when Iraq is declared free from weapons of mass destruction. "I am not anti-UK or US or pro-Iraqi, I am for people," he said recently. "What may have been a harmless deprivation in the first two years, nine and a half years down the road has led to very serious cracks in the social fabric." He said it was his "honest conviction that you cannot deprive people from their fundamental human rights. [Iraqis] have as much right for employment, education and health as anyone else, but oil-for-food has at best given them a minimum." The US and UK also complained to the secretary-general last year about Prakash Shah, Mr Annan's former envoy to Baghdad, after Mr Shah warned in a press interview of the effects of sanctions on Iraqi society. A diplomat said: "There was a feeling that Halliday had become a kind of militant, and it was thought Von Sponeck, who is very calm, would be different. But he too started to speak about sanctions."