News

07 October 1997

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT SAYS COST OF NATO ENLARGEMENT "AFFORDABLE"

(Says she will insist that allies share burden fairly) (820)

By Susan Ellis

USIA Congressional Correspondent



Washington -- The cost of enlarging NATO "is real but affordable,"
Secretary of State Albright told the Senate Committee on Foreign
Relations October 7.


Albright said she would insist that "our old allies share this burden
fairly." In consultations with U.S. allies, she added, the main focus
"needs to be on defining the level of military capability we want our
old and new allies to have...and then making sure that they commit to
that level. We must spend no more than we must, but no less than we
need to keep NATO strong."


In reference to Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, Committee
Chairman Senator Jesse Helms said he is convinced the three new
democracies seeking NATO membership are "ready and willing to pay
their fair share." But, he added: "We must now make certain that our
present NATO allies are likewise willing to fulfill their end of the
bargain."


Helms contended that current NATO members expect the United States to
pay the "lion's share" of costs related to enlargement. Approval of
NATO enlargement by the U.S. Senate "may very well succeed or fail on
the question of whether you can dissuade our allies of that notion,"
Helms said. (Two-thirds of the Senate must give its "advice and
consent" to amend the North Atlantic Treaty to accept the Czech
Republic, Hungary, and Poland into the trans-Atlantic alliance.)


Albright responded that the U.S. is working with the NATO allies to
produce a common estimate of cost-sharing to be considered at the
North Atlantic Council meeting in December. Acknowledging that there
are "serious people" who estimate far higher costs of NATO enlargement
than the administration, she said the U.S. estimate is "premised on
the current, favorable security environment in Europe....Obviously, if
a grave threat were to arise, the cost of enlargement would rise. But
then so would the cost of our entire defense budget."


In respect to the three new candidates for NATO membership -- Hungary,
Poland and the Czech Republic -- Albright continued: "I am certain our
prospective allies are willing and able to pay their share, because in
the long run it will be cheaper for them to upgrade their forces
within the alliance than outside it."


Addressing the concern of some Americans that enlargement could
"dilute NATO" by adding too may members involved in too many missions,
Albright stressed that "only the strongest" candidates were asked to
join the alliance, and said "nothing about enlargement will change
NATO's core mission, which remains the collective defense of NATO
soil."


On the subject of Bosnia, the secretary of state noted concerns that a
debate on continued U.S. engagement there after next June might
overlap with the debate on NATO expansion. She said debate on the two
issues "cannot be separated" and that "both are aimed at building a
stable, undivided Europe."


She added: "It was our experience in Bosnia that proved the
fundamental premise of our enlargement stategy: there are still
threats to peace and security in Europe that only NATO can meet. It
was in Bosnia that our prospective allies proved they are ready to
take responsibility for the security of others."


Also in Bosnia, Albright continued, "We proved NATO and Russian troops
can work together."


Commenting on other issues related to NATO-Russian relations, Albright
said that although Russian opposition to NATO enlargement is real,
"instead of changing our policies to accommodate Russia's outdated
fears, we need to encourage Russia's more modern aspirations (toward
democracy).


"This means we should remain Russia's most steadfast champion whenever
it seeks to define its greatness by joining rule-based institutions,
opening its markets, and participating constructively in world
affairs."


As examples of this, Albright cited reformers' gains in the Russian
government, culminating in agreement to pursue deeper arms reductions,
and Russia's full partnership at the Summit of the Eight in Denver and
membership in the Paris Club of major international lenders.


Senator Joseph Biden, ranking Democrat on the committee, also stressed
the need for America's European and Canadian partners in NATO to bear
"their fair share of enlargement costs." He noted new sources of
instability in post-Cold War Europe, including "ethnic and religious
conflict, international crime, drugs (and) possible threats to Middle
East oil supplies."


At the same time, he said, "Europeans, left to themselves, have proven
sadly incapable of settling their differences peacefully. The United
States must lead in creating a new 'security architecture' for the
continent."


Biden said the choice is not whether to enlarge NATO because "the
status quo is not an option." If NATO were not to enlarge, the
countries in the region would seek to create other alliances, which
could alter the current strategic balance in Europe, he concluded.