News



      DATE=05/04/98
      TYPE=U-S OPINION ROUNDUP
    NUMBER=6-10695
     TITLE=THE U-S SENATE VOTES TO EXPAND NATO         
    BYLINE=ANDREW N. GUTHRIE
 TELEPHONE=619-3335
  DATELINE=WASHINGTON

CONTENT=

INTRO:  THE UNITED STATES SENATE VOTED OVERWHELMINGLY LATE LAST 
WEEK TO RATIFY THE EXPANSION OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY 
ORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE POLAND, THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND HUNGARY.  
THE VOTE, WHICH CROSSED PARTY LINES, WAS 80 TO 19, AND TOOK PLACE
LATE THURSDAY EVENING AFTER TWELVE HOURS OF CONTINUOUS DEBATE.

IN THE AMERICAN PRESS, HOWEVER, THE ARGUMENT STILL RAGES WITH 
SOME PAPERS APPLAUDING THE MOVE, AND OTHERS WORRIED ABOUT HOW IT 
WILL AFFECT RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA.

JOINING US NOW IS ___________________ WITH A SAMPLING IN TODAY'S 
U-S OPINION ROUNDUP. 

TEXT:  MARYLAND SENATOR BARBARA MILKULSKI, A POLISH-AMERICAN, 
COMMENTED 'WE'RE VOTING TO MAKE EUROPE MORE STABLE AND AMERICA 
MORE SECURE' AS SHE RECOUNTED POLAND'S TROUBLED HISTORY UNDER 
NAZI AND SOVIET DOMINATION.  HOWEVER, VETERAN DEMOCRATIC SENATORS
DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN OF NEW YORK AND PATRICK LEAHY OF VERMONT,
WHO HAVE SUPPORTED MUCH OF PRESIDENT CLINTON'S FOREIGN POLICY, 
DENOUNCED THE EXPANSION. 

THE TWO LAWMAKERS SAID IT WOULD ENCOURAGE NATIONALISTS IN RUSSIA.
..... SENATOR LEAHY TOLD HIS COLLEAGUES HE REMAINS 'PROFOUNDLY 
TROUBLED' BY THE IDEA OF PUSHING NATO TO THE EDGE OF RUSSIA.

THAT GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF HOW DIVIDED SOME IN CONGRESS ARE. FOR 
AN IDEA OF HOW THE PRESS REACTED, HERE IS A COMMENT FROM "THE SAN
FRANCISCO CHRONICLE" [5/1]:

VOICE:   IT WAS A BRIGHT DAY FOR THE PROSPECT OF CONSOLIDATING 
         DEMOCRACY AND PROMOTING THE EXPANSION OF CAPITALISM IN 
         THE FORMER SOVIET BLOC.  AS AMENDMENTS TO CURTAIL NATO 
         ENLARGEMENT FELL LIKE SO MANY CHUNKS IS OF THE BERLIN 
         WALL, PRESIDENT CLINTON WAS CONFIDENT ENOUGH OF AN 
         AFFIRMATIVE VOTE TO DECLARE THAT THE WORLD WAS MOVING 
         'CLOSER THAN EVER TO REALIZING THE DREAM OF A 
         GENERATION: A EUROPE THAT IS UNITED, DEMOCRATIC AND 
         SECURE.'  [MR.] CLINTON DESERVED CREDIT FOR PROVIDING 
         LEADERSHIP ON THIS CRITICAL MATTER OF FOREIGN POLICY.   
         ..... FOR ALL THE QUESTIONS ABOUT EXPANSION ..... THERE 
         WAS NO DENYING THAT NATO'S BASIC MISSION WOULD HAVE TO 
         CHANGE IN THIS POST-COLD WAR ERA.  ADDING NEW 
         DEMOCRACIES AS THEY MATURE IS A NECESSARY ELEMENT OF 
         THAT CHANGE.

TEXT:  ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE NATION, PORTLAND'S "MAINE SUNDAY 
TELEGRAM" ALSO APPROVES, SAYING THAT FUTURE HISTORIANS WILL LOOK 
BACK ON THE DATE OF APRIL 30TH AS HISTORIC, AND ADDING THAT THE 
WORLD IS BETTER FOR THE DECISION.

VOICE:   THE ACTION HAS HUGE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE AMERICAN 
         PEOPLE.  IT MEANS THIS NATION HAS PLEDGED TO RESPOND TO 
         AN ATTACK ON PRAGUE, BUDAPEST OR WARSAW IN THE SAME 
         MANNER AS IT WOULD ..... WASHINGTON, D.C.  IT WILL MEAN 
         EXPANDING THE MILITARY PRESENCE OF THE UNITED STATES AND
         OTHER NATO COUNTRIES 644 KILOMETERS ... EASTWARD TOWARD 
         RUSSIA.   .... FOR NEARLY HALF A CENTURY ... NATO HAS 
         PROVEN TO BE THE UNDERPINNING OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY 
         FOR WESTERN EUROPE.  THAT FACT IS CLEAR TO RUSSIA AND 
         OTHER NON-NATO COUNTRIES IN EUROPE, AND IT'S DOUBTFUL 
         THEY FEEL THREATENED.

TEXT:  TAKING A DECIDEDLY DIFFERENT VIEW IS GEORGE KENNAN, A 
FORMER AMBASSADOR TO MOSCOW DURING THE COLD WAR AND THE MAN 
CREDITED WITH BEING THE ARCHITECT OF AMERICA'S CONTAINMENT POLICY
TOWARD THE SOVIET UNION.  NOW, AT 94, HE IS LIVING OUT HIS 
RETIREMENT IN PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY.  WRITING IN "THE NEW YORK 
TIMES" COLUMNIST THOMAS FRIEDMAN CALLED MR. KENNAN FOR HIS VIEWS 
AND REPORTS THE VETERAN STATESMAN'S STARK ASSESSMENT.

VOICE:   'I THINK IT IS THE BEGINNING OF A NEW COLD WAR ..... I 
         THINK THE RUSSIANS WILL GRADUALLY REACT QUITE ADVERSELY 
         AND IT WILL AFFECT THEIR POLICIES.  I THINK IT IS A 
         TRAGIC MISTAKE.  THERE WAS NO REASON FOR THIS 
         WHATSOEVER.  NO ONE WAS THREATENING ANYBODY ELSE.  THIS 
         EXPANSION WOULD MAKE THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THIS 
         COUNTRY TURN OVER IN THEIR GRAVES [AN IDIOM FOR: "BEING 
         PROFOUNDLY UPSET" WITH SOMETHING.]  WE HAVE SIGNED UP TO
         PROTECT A WHOLE SERIES OF COUNTRIES, EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE
         NEITHER THE RESOURCES NOR THE INTENTION TO DO SO IN ANY 
         SERIOUS WAY.  [NATO EXPANSION] WAS SIMPLY A 
         LIGHT-HEARTED ACTION BY A SENATE THAT HAS NO REAL 
         INTEREST IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS.'  ..... AS HE SAID GOODBYE 
         TO ME ON THE PHONE, MR. KENNAN ADDED JUST ONE MORE 
         THING: 'THIS HAS BEEN MY LIFE, AND IT PAINS ME TO SEE IT
         SO SCREWED UP [MISHANDLED] IN THE END.'

TEXT:  "THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER" SAYS THE SENATE DEBATE 
ANSWERED NONE OF THE NAGGING QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT IT CONSIDERS AN
ILL-ADVISED FOREIGN POLICY DECISION.

VOICE:   ..... THE SENATE VOTE DOESN'T CLARIFY WHY THE MEMBERSHIP
         MATTERS WHEN THE SOVIET UNION IS DEAD AND THE IRON 
         CURTAIN IS HISTORY.  ..... THE SENATE VOTE .... FAILS TO
         ANSWER ANY OF THE NAGGING QUESTIONS THAT MAKE NATO 
         EXPANSION UNWISE.  THE NATO ALLIANCE WAS FORMED TO    
         DEFEND WESTERN EUROPE AGAINST SOVIET AGGRESSION.  THE 
         CLINTON ADMINISTRATION INSISTS THAT NATO'S MISSION NO 
         LONGER IS TO CONTAIN RUSSIAN MIGHT.  SO WHY EXPAND THE 
         ALLIANCE'S BORDERS EAST?   .... THE ADMINISTRATION SAYS 
         NATO SHOULD FOCUS ON ETHNIC CONFLICTS AND ON 
         INTERNATIONAL THREATS SUCH AS DRUGS AND TERRORISM.  
         FINE.  BUT MOST EUROPEAN MEMBERS OF NATO WERE RELUCTANT 
         TO INTERVENE IN BOSNIA, AND FEW CAN AGREE ON MEASURES TO
         STOP ETHNIC KILLING IN KOSOVO OR PREVENT RENEWED CIVIL 
         WAR IN CYPRUS.   .... IF NATO DECISIONS  --  WHICH 
         REQUIRE A CONSENSUS  --  ARE SO HARD TO MAKE WITH 16 
         MEMBERS, HOW CAN THEY BE MADE WITH THREE MORE?  TEN 
         MORE?  IF THE ADMINISTRATION DOESN'T EXERCISE CAUTION, 
         IT MAY EXPAND NATO INTO IMPOTENCE.

TEXT:  FINALLY, SOME COMMENTS FROM "THE WASHINGTON POST" WHICH 
SUPPORTED THE VOTE, POINTING OUT THE BIPARTISAN SUPPORT OF THE 
MOVE, WITH PRESIDENT CLINTON LAUNCHING NATO ENLARGEMENT, AND A 
REPUBLICAN SENATE RATIFYING IT.   "THE POST" SAYS THAT WHILE 
RUSSIA IS STILL IN A DELICATE TRANSITION TO CAPITALISM AND 
DEMOCRACY, AND MAY BE ALIENATED BY THE MOVE,  THAT SHOULD   NOT  
BE AN ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS EXPANSION.

VOICE:   IT WOULD BE FOOLISH TO SAY THAT RUSSIA, A COUNTRY STILL 
         IN A VULNERABLE PHASE OF UPROOTEDNESS AND TRANSITION, 
         CANNOT BE FURTHER ALIENATED.  BUT THAT SIMPLY MAKES IT 
         PRUDENT TO ENGAGE WITH RUSSIA MORE DEEPLY ACROSS THE 
         BOARD IN ORDER TO PREVENT THE OPPONENTS' DIRE FORECASTS 
         FROM  BECOMING TRUE BY OFFICIAL DEFAULT.  NO DOUBT MANY 
         RUSSIANS WOULD PREFER TO KEEP CENTRAL EUROPE A SPHERE OF
         INFLUENCE IN WHICH TRADITIONAL RUSSIAN SECURITY 
         AMBITIONS PREVAIL ..... BUT THE COLD WAR WAS FOUGHT, ON 
         THE AMERICAN SIDE, PRECISELY TO PREVENT THAT OLD HABIT 
         FROM BEING SUSTAINED.

TEXT:  ON THAT NOTE, WE CONCLUDE THIS SAMPLING OF EDITORIAL 
REACTION TO THE SENATE'S VOTE LAST WEEK ON EXPANDING NATO.

NEB/ANG/KL  

04-May-98 1:59 PM EDT (1759 UTC)
NNNN

Source: Voice of America
.