USIS Foreign Media Reaction 
Report

20 June 1997

SUMMIT OF THE EIGHT AT DENVER: 'SPOTLIGHT ON THE TRIUMPH OF THE U.S.'







A majority of scenesetters overseas saw the strength of the

American economy providing President Clinton an ideal

platform on which to host the Summit of the Eight at

Denver.  Commentators generally agreed that there is plenty

for America to celebrate.  Milan's leading business-

oriented  Il Sole-24 Ore, for example, held that "Superstar

America" is "not just..the only unchallenged  political-

military superpower, but also...the economic giant...the

boss of  globalization and technological innovation."  In

many instances, the superpower's strengths and influence

were contrasted with that of Europe.  Paris's right-of-

center Le Figaro contended that "the U.S. plays a decisive

role at the UN, NATO and the G-8.  Three major world

meeting places where Europe does not have its place.... 

And so, on the eve of the Denver summit,  the U.S. is bound

for clear sailing."   Pundits also believed that President

Clinton would take full advantage of America's standing to

put forth U.S. views on a wide range of economic and

political issues.  The president's announcement just days

before the start of the summit of a series of  U.S. trade

measures with Africa to promote free-market reforms was

seen as one such instance where Washington was setting the

pace.   European observers--especially in France and

Belgium--determined that President Clinton's African

initiative, while "pragmatic," was also opportunistic, and

fills a "vacuum" left by former European colonial powers. 

Dailies in Africa and elsewhere noted the apparent "change"

in the U.S.-African relationship from "donor-beggar" to

"seller-buyer."   Kampala's government-supported New Vision

saw the plan as offering Africa "a chance to...become part

of the global economic phenomenon." 



Russian  President Yeltsin's fuller participation in the

summit was another aspect underscored by the media.  Most

saw Russia's expanded role in the Group as desirable and

one way to ensure the continuation of economic reform in

that country.  But opinion was mixed on whether now was the

proper time for Russia's inclusion.  Naysayers stressed

that Russia is "far from being an advanced industrial

power."   London's conservative Daily Telegraph noted that

Russia "does not, by any financial yardstick, merit a place

at the top table."   A considerable number determined that

Mr. Yeltsin's presence this year was part of President

Clinton's "bargaining chip in exchange for Russian

acceptance of NATO  expansion."  In Moscow, a number of

analysts were  convinced that Russia is already "one of the

Eight."  Others, however, suggested that the Russian

economy would have to improve before it can really join

"the big league."  In Japan, where the government at first

objected to Russian participation in the summit because a

dispute over northern territories remains unresolved,

several dailies noted that Russia's membership in the Group

was already a "given fact."  They urged the Tokyo

government to "deal with the situation in a positive

manner" by working with Russia on the territorial issue. 

Commentators from all quarters suggested that Russia's

participation in the G-7 summit fundamentally changes the

Group's objective, making it a political--rather than

economic--forum.  Finally, ruminations about the usefulness

of G-7 summitry in general was the focus in several

commentaries.  Opinion about this year's summit seemed to

echo the sentiment of years past.  Seoul's pro-business

Joong-Ang Ilbo,for example, concluded:  "At the end of the

summit there will probably be a statement full of rhetoric

but empty of substance." 

This survey is based on 66 reports from 17 countries, June

10-20.

EDITOR:  Diana McCaffrey



                             G-7 AND RUSSIA

                                    

GERMANY:  "Spirit Of The West Experienced Boom And Bust" 



Carola Kaps reported in right-of-center Frankfurter

Allgemeine (6/20):  "For the 'Summit of the Eight'' Denver

offers a perfect scenery.  The development of the city at

the foot of the Rocky Mountains shows how  people can come

to terms with crises and meet the challenges of 

globalization through diligence, inventiveness, openness,

flexibility and  self-confidence.  With the example of this

dynamic city, President  Clinton can demonstrate to his

foreign guests what is lending wings to  the United States

and the 'young generation' compared to the old  Europe.... 

But it is of even greater significance for Clinton to give 

his guests an impression of the 'Western spirit,' which is

so  characteristic for the United States.  The tough

experiences during the  pioneering times resulted in the

development of the unbridled will for freedom, the striving

for independence, and the unshakable belief in  one's own

capabilities." 



"Doubts About Russia"



Werner Adam noted in an editorial in right-of-center

Frankfurter Allgemeine (6/20):  "We must wonder  whether

Russia's acceptance in the this round is justified by the

current  outcome of Moscow's reform efforts.  In this

respect, we must have  considerable doubts.  This is

especially the case, because there are a  number of

Yeltsin's aides who blame others, preferably Western

powers, for their own failure.  One example is First Deputy

Premier Nemzow's  nonsensical accusations about the WTO and

his insulting behavior towards its  representatives.  But

maybe this will change under the banner of the new  'G-8.'"





"Bill Clinton Discovers Africa"



Wolfgang Drechsler had this to say in business Handelsblatt

of Duesseldorf (6/20):   "With Washington's policy toward

China entangled in political scandals, the time seems to be

ripe for a cost-efficient and, at the same time, effective

public relations initiative for Africa.  There is no doubt

that the new American diplomatic interest in Africa

contributed to this.  Because of the hegemony of the former

colonial powers from Europe, Washington has hardly shown an

interest in Africa.  But after Mobutu's toppling, a power

vacuum developed which U.S. diplomacy very much wants to

fill." 



"Clinton In Enviable Position" 



Yvonne Esterhazy editorialized in business Handelsblatt of

Duesseldorf (6/19):  "When host Bill Clinton looks around

next week at the economic summit in  Denver next week, he

can be quite satisfied, since he does not cut a bad  figure

among his guests from the industrialized nations and

Russia.   Helmut Kohl is an embattled leader, Jacques

Chirac comes as a loser, Canada's Premier Chretien as

someone who narrowly survived elections, and  newcomer Tony

Blair, who received lots of premature praise, must still 

prove that he is able to withstand his first endurance

test.  Japan's Premier  Hashimoto, let alone Boris Yeltsin

have problems at home.  Clinton in  turn is carrying around

a number of potentially explosive scandals which  could

prove to be very unpleasant in the long run, but currently

he has no problems in economic, domestic or foreign

policy....  According to the latest opinion poll, 57

percent of Americans consider Bill Clinton to be a good

president.  As long as the economy is booming and as long

as there is no threatening foreign policy crisis in  sight,

this could remain so.  The president is now directing his 

attention to long-term shortcomings in the United

States...and over the  weekend, Clinton launched a widely

hailed initiative to harmonize racial segregation, which he

tried to give a new momentum with lots of  rhetoric but

little substance.  In the fall, the president also wants to 

launch a campaign against hate crimes.... All this is

laudable, but in  view of a tightly knotted budget corset,

it should not cost too much money.   Some of Clinton's

guests in Denver, however, would be happy if they only had

to deal with such problems." 







"Trade Instead Of Aid--America's New Slogan For Africa" 



Achim Remde wrote in right-of-center Die Welt of Berlin

(6/18):  "Without great fuss, the United States has again

reduced its development  aid for Africa by formulating a

new policy that is based on the principle 'trade instead of

aid' and concentrates on customs preferences and debt

forgiveness, as well as on the support of the private

sector.   The reconstruction program for Africa that was

presented at the end of April emphasizes trade and

investment....  This policy is in accordance with the view

that, on the one hand, the damage that is caused by

protectionism and trade obstacles of the industrialized

nations in the Third World cannot be made up by more

extensive development assistance, while, on the other hand,

development  assistance has often proved to be useless,

even detrimental....   North-South relations are now

dominated by human rights rather than by questions of

development assistance.  Here, too, the United States seems

to be pursuing a more pragmatic policy than Germany or the

European Union.  While the EU demands, in principle, the

introduction of  multi-party democracy, the United States

considers this question of  secondary importance compared

to human rights questions.  This is why the  Unites States

has had, for instance, good relations with Uganda's leader,

Mr. Museveni."



"Clinton's Skillfulness" 



Washington correspondent Uwe Knuepfer filed the following

editorial  for centrist General-Anzeiger of Bonn (6/14): 

"If Clinton  receives his colleagues at the G-8 summit in

Denver at the end of this week, nobody will act in a more

relaxed and self-assured way than he on the mine field of

international politics.  This vivid class (of state 

leaders) is still secretively whispering, but in Denver

this class will  quietly and radiantly gather for a photo

opportunity with their teacher." 



BRITAIN:  "Booming American Economy:  Perfect Backdrop For

Summit"



BBC-TV reported (6/20):  "The booming American economy is a

perfect backdrop for President Clinton to boast about the

economic strategy he says the rest of the world should

follow.  But above all, this is a cause for celebration for

the Americans, who not only run the only military

superpower left but also the world's most productive and

dynamic economy." 



"Righteous Clinton Free To Preach To G-8" 



The centrist weekly European had this commentary by

diplomatic editor Ian Mather (6/20):  "Rarely can the host

country of an international gathering have been better

placed to preach to the other participants as the United

States will be at the Denver summit....  With the American

economy in sparkling form and that of Europe lackluster at

best, as debate at Amsterdam demonstrated, President

Clinton's aides say this year's meeting will be in marked

contrast to previous ones at which the leaders of the other

industrialized countries tore into the United States for

its huge deficits.  This time it will be the United States

that will take to the pulpit, and Clinton does not intend

to waste the opportunity....  He is expected to go on the

offensive, pressing Europe to reform its welfare programs

and urging Japan to open up domestic-led growth to foreign

imports." 



"Bill Clinton's Golden Moment" 



The independent weekly Economist opined (6/20):  "Every

host likes to show off; and few have more chance than Bill

Clinton at the opening this weekend of the Summit of the

Eight...  Best of all is the fact that he presides over an

economy that is now the wonder of the world....  To the

perplexity and envy of the Denver summiteers, America, with

over 12 million new jobs since 1991, now seems to be an

unstoppable job-creating machine....  The  question is

whether he (President Clinton), and Americans in general,

are making the most of these extraordinary times.  Economic

booms bring governments more revenue, as well as more

breathing space.  These can be frittered away, or they can

be used to tackle deep-seated problems and invest in future

growth.  



"America at present, like the proverbial summer

grasshopper, is doing more frittering than stockpiling.... 

If America's fiscal management begins to wobble, the

country will start to lose its attraction as a model for

the world to emulate.  And Bill Clinton (by then either on

the Little Rock golf course, or in disgrace) may well

lament that when he had his golden moment, he mostly basked

in it."



"Yeltsin Has Place At Top Table For 'Summit Of Eight'" 



The conservative Daily Telegraph commented from Moscow

(6/19):  "President Yeltsin will see a personal dream come

true tomorrow when Russia is accepted as practically a full

member of the top industrialized nations' club, the Group

of Seven, at Denver.  In honor of his close relationship

with Mr. Yeltsin, President Clinton has renamed the

occasion the 'Summit of the Eight', to the delight of the

Kremlin.  Moscow sees it as a sign that Russia is at last

accepted not as a threat but as a useful member of the

international community....  Mr. Yeltsin delights in

summitry.  But his enjoyment of these affairs cannot

disguise the fact that Russia does not, by any financial

yardstick, merit a place at the top table....   Far from

being an advanced industrial power, much of the population

depends on growing their own vegetables to survive." 



"Clinton To Offer Africa A New Deal' 



The centrist Independent noted (6/18):  "The United States

is to embark on a major economic initiative for sub-Saharan

Africa, designed to shift the focus of policy from aid and

development toward trade and investment.  The package was

unveiled yesterday at the White House....  The timing was

seen in Washington partly as a move by the United States to

pre-empt criticism from other G-7 countries at Denver,

notably France, that it was not doing as much as it could

to assist developing countries in general and African

countries in particular.  However, the initiative was also

seen as an attempt to steer discussions at Denver, where a

session will be devoted to Africa, away from the themes of

African poverty and civil strife towards the successes

among African states that have adopted free market

principles." 



"U.S. Plan To Boost African Economies" 



The independent Financial Times stated (6/18):  "President

Clinton yesterday invoked the support of both American

political parties, and the private sector, for an ambitious

plan to revitalize the economies of Africa through trade

and investment....  The White  House has pledged to use

this week's G-7 summit in Denver to lobby support for the

idea of debt relief for Africa's poorest nations."



"Leading Muslim States Unite To Challenge G-7" 



The liberal Guardian reported from Istanbul (6/16):

"Leaders of eight of the world's biggest Muslim states,

meeting in Istanbul yesterday, launched a new group for

economic and political cooperation. The organization,

called the Developing Eight, or D-8, links Nigeria, Egypt,

Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia and Turkey. 

It is seen as an Islamic counterweight to balance the G-7

group of industrialized democracies, meeting in Denver

later this week.  Twenty years ago a meeting of the D-8

leaders would probably have agreed that the West had a

moral obligation to give aid to promote economic

development.  Now the talk is of globalization and

technology transfer....  The eight share a population of

800 million but together represent less than one 40th of

world economic output." 



FRANCE:  "In Denver, Europe As Union Absent--As At UN And

NATO"



Baudoin Bollaert wrote in right-of-center Le Figaro (6/20):

"The Amsterdam summit has certainly not helped bring about

a counterweight to U.S. hegemony.  As the sole major

superpower, the United States plays a decisive role at the

UN, NATO and the G-8--three major world meeting places

where Europe does not have its place....  And so, on the

eve of the Denver summit, the United States is bound for

clear sailing.



"As a French diplomat said:  'The division of power favors

the U.S. and not the European Union.'  He added that U.S.

hegemony is such 'that in today's world, Europeans couldn't

even sign the Rome Treaty.'" 



"Clinton Launches 'Afro-American' Partnership For Growth"



Patrick Sabatier said in left-of-center Liberation (6/19): 

"President Clinton  has officially launched his 'Afro-

American partnership for growth.'  It is  a policy adapted

to the post-Cold War era, to  budgetary constraints and to

Clinton's new African ambitions...for a  'democratic and

stable Africa.'...  Clinton plans to urge his Denver 

partners to do the same and to wipe out the staggering

bilateral and  multilateral African debts....  His

initiative holds no surprises:  It officially confirms the

changes that have taken place since the start of  the

Clinton administration which were initiated by Commerce

Secretary Ron  Brown....  The point is to change the

relationship of `donor-beggar' into a relationship of

'seller-buyer.' This is an easy enough policy for  Clinton. 

It brings together liberal Democrats, conservative

Republicans  and all Afro-American politicians who want the

United States to pay attention to  Africa. There is also a

strategic motivation behind the initiative:  traditional 

networks of influence left over from the post-colonial era 

are falling apart, leaving a 'strategic vacuum.'  A new

generation of  Africans is emerging, open to the U.S. model

of economic liberalism." 



"U.S. As Lesson-Giver In Denver" 



Jean-Marie Macabrey observed in centrist La Tribune (6/18):

"With two days to go  before the opening of the Denver

summit, the United States is having difficulty in 

remaining modest.  Its economic and financial situation is

in far better  shape than Europe's or Japan's....  The

Clinton administration is sure to  exploit this success

story as a domestic policy ploy, even if it means 

irritating other participants....  Regarding Europe, the

United States plans to speak about economic growth and the

single currency.  Says Daniel Tarullo, the  president's

advisor for international economic affairs:  'It is in our

best interest to have European economies proceed with the

structural  changes needed to reduce unemployment and

stimulate growth.'...  New measures to limit the risks to

financial markets due to globalization will be announced at

the summit....  Africa will also be a major theme.  But

here again the United States will impose its own view. 

Under pressure from Congress, the Clinton administration

will speak in favor of foreign investment and bilateral

trade, as opposed to traditional financial aid."  



CANADA:   "The Rocky Mountain 8"



Under the above headline, the liberal Toronto Star asserted

(6/20):  "It's official.  Economics take a back seat when

Jean Chretien and the Summit of Eight leaders gather

tonight in Denver.  The old Group of Seven, assembled in

1975 as an economic talkshop, is no more.   Now it's the

'P-8,' including Russia.  The political eight.  So heavy

hitters like host Bill Clinton, Ryutaro Hashimoto and

Helmut Kohl plan to spend barely 90 mnutes tomorrow chewing

over trade, interest rate and  currency values--even though

their economies are meshed as never before, through

globalization.  Still, ushering Boris Yeltsin into the

political club will boost economic stability throughout

Eurasia, as well as political stability.  Moscow's enhanced

status is a payback for Yeltsin's acquiescence to the

eastward expansion of NATO and a bow to his democratic and

economic reforms.  But thre's no denying that a more

cooperative northern hemisphere, in which Russia plays a

positive role, will be good for business....  So while much

of the 'P-8' agenda is not 'economic' in the narrowest

sense, it does mirror the 'era of ever-widening and

deepening global integration' in which we live, as a U.S.

official put it....  Building the global village always has

been as much a political, as an economic, challenge." 



"Summit Of The Eight Won't Add Up To Much"



The business-oriented Financial Post opined (6/20): 

"Russia hasn't looked back since it got its foot in the

door of the exclusive G-7 club in 1991....  





"This year's meeting is being turned into a string of

banquets, parties and receptions where Yeltsin will be the

focus of attention--a  payback for big-power Russia going

along with NATO's expansion eastward.   The result,

however, is that pressing economic problems will be given

short shrift....  However, if a new G-8 wants to avoid the

criticisms of the past--the 'media circus,' 'hot-air fest'-

-it cannot afford to repeat the kind of summit Denver is

shaping up to be, that is, long on pageantry and short on

substance."



"Political Mountain Climbing" 



Montreal's liberal La Presse concluded (6/20):  "The

presence of the Russian president...at the summit will

allow questions such as terrorism, organized crime and drug 

trafficking to be brought up in a useful way.  One has the

impression that Yeltsin's presence is calculated to deflect

attention from the more difficult problems of the hour: 

(un)employment and international trade."  



ITALY:  "Superstar America"



Adriana Cerretelli wrote from Denver in leading business Il

Sole-24 Ore (6/20): "This summit will be different than

previous ones,  for it will be exclusively and

exaggeratedly American:  It will be the celebration of

Superstar America, not just as the only unchallenged 

political-military superpower, but also as the economic

giant which has restored the full supremacy of its model

for development, the boss of  globalization and

technological innovation from which it is now in a 

position to get maximum benefit.  Denver, in sum, will be a

spotlight on the triumph of the United States over the rest

of the Western world." 



"Clinton Has Achieved All His Goals"



Giulietto Chiesa wrote on the front page of centrist,

influential La Stampa (6/20): "The Denver summit promises

to go down in history books as a turning point....  It is

America, successful all along the line...that will 'create

the context.'  We already knew which nation was the

strongest, but its glory is shining today and the rest of

the world's  leaders--those who rely on its power, its

military power among these--can only line up at its side. 

The differences with the Lyon summit last year  are

enormous.  Bill Clinton had yet to win his second mandate.  

Encouraging economic signals were there already, but the

certainty of the  triumph was still far off.  And Russia

was still immersed in uncertainty.....  Everything has gone

for the better since then.  The U.S. economy is an

impressive locomotive.  NATO is expanding its borders to

include a conspicuous share of what used to be the enemy's

territory.   The Russian leadership not only does not

protest but, apart from  inevitable recriminations,

smilingly negotiates loans with the World Bank  and the

IMF....  Clinton has achieved all his goals.  Even the most

difficult one, 'a policy toward Russia.'" 



"An 'Italian Model' For Developing Countries"



Centrist, top-circulation Corriere della Sera wrote (6/19):

"There is the privatization wave: Made in  Britain.  There

is the Washington consensus:  Made in the USA.  In a few 

days, at the G-7 summit, an 'Italian model' may be

officially born:  Small- and medium-sized business firms as

the key to development in Third World countries.... 

Italian foreign Minister Dini will arrive in Denver with a

proposal he would like to be included in the final

communique of  the summit: an invitation to international

organizations which deal with development, beginning with

the World Bank, to begin testing throughout  the world the

Italian model of small and medium businesses....  At least

on one occasion, President Clinton also referred to the

success of the  Italian system. The foreign ministry's

initiative is now seeking to turn  recognition into

something exportable:  After all, this is also how the 

reputation of a country is built." 











JAPAN:  "Let's Go Back To Rambouillet" 



In the editorial view of liberal Mainichi (6/18):  "With

the change of format from G-7 to G-8 and Russia

participating fully for the first time, the summit has

become an increasingly political event.  There will be a

plethora of subjects for discussion....  These include

macroeconomic policies, stabilization of international

financial markets, aid for Africa, policies for our aging

societies and anti-terrorism coordinaton.  However, there

are no critical issues requiring immediate world attention. 

In fact, there have been few notable achievements from the

past 22 G-7 summits.  The Denver summit will likely end up

being another political stage show managed by its host,

President Clinton."  



"Japan Should Make Good Use Of Denver Summit" 



Conservative Sankei maintained (6/18):  "The G-7 summit has

been changed to a G-8 format in order to accept Russia as a

full member.  The Denver summit, to the extent that it

clears the way for Russia to fall into step with the

Western world, will make an important contribution to world

stability.  Russia's full participation is already an

established fact.  Japan should deal with the situation in

a positive manner and urge Russia, in a way consistent with

the responsibilities of a major world power, to settle the

northern territorial issue....  Japan should also ask other

G-7 nations to support its position on the territorial

dispute and put the issue on the summit agenda."



"Russia's Full Participation In The Denver Summit Is Good

For Japan"



The liberal Tokyo Shimbun held (6/17): "Japan still has at

best mixed feelings about Russia's full participation in

the Denver summit.  At the same time, Japanese and Russian

participation at multilateral conferences like this may

help pave the way for resolving individual bilateral

problems.  Russia's full participation is a highlight at

the this year's summit but such participation certainly

shows how far we have come from the original objectives of

a summit of economically advanced Western nations.... 

Russia has attended political sessions of G-7 summits since

1994 and Russia's full participation in the Denver summit

appears to be an inevitable consequence of the post-Cold

War era....  This was a 'deal' Mr. Clinton made (with

Russian President Yeltsin) in exchange for Russia's

acceptance of NATO eastward expansion." 



"Clinton And Hashimoto Should Address Defense Cooperation"



Quasi-governmental NHK-TV's guest commentator Yukio

Matsuyama observed (6/17), "The Denver summit and pre-

summit talks between President Clinton and Prime Minister

Hashimoto are important diplomatic events for Japan.  The

prime minister should use these occasions to establish

Japan's importance in the post-Cold War  international

community.  In particular, we will pay attention to how

President Clinton and Prime Minister Hashimoto address the

ongoing review of the U.S. Japan defense cooperation

guidelines.  In Japan, some criticize the review as a de

facto establishment of a new, strengthened U.S.-Japan

security treaty.  Japanese politicians and the Japanese

people should discuss the pros and cons of the defense

guidelines."   



"Russia's Participation Causes Changes In G-7 Summit

Structure"



Business-oriented Nihon Keizai editorialized (6/13),

"Twenty-two  years after the first summit of advanced

industrialized countries in  Rambouillet, France, Russia is

attending the June 20-22 Denver summit as  a full member. 

This is the first major change in the 'G-7 summit' 

structure, a mechanism that serve as a 'command tower' for

advanced  Western countries.  It has been pointed out,

however, that Russia has already attended  political

sessions of previous G-7 summits and full membership is not 

surprising.  We wonder if President Clinton has not made

membership in  the summit structure less significant by

offering it to Russian President  Yeltsin as a bargaining

chip in exchange for Russian acceptance of NATO  expansion.



"Any major change in the characteristics of G-7 summits is

significant,  especially for a an organization whose

membership had been limited to  advanced Western countries. 

Subjects for discussion at the Denver summit  will probably

be different from those of previous summits.  First and 

foremost, Japan will find it more difficult to bring up the

Northern Territories issue.  A major change, indeed. 

Russia's full participation  may also provide the

opportunity to review G-7 membership for other  countries." 

  



"Japan Is Placed On Top Of Other Summit Nations"



Liberal Tokyo  Shimbun said (6/10), "The U.S. government on

Monday unveiled its official  logo for the Denver summit. 

The logo features the national flags of  eight summit

members and the European Commission.  It also carries the 

title 'Denver Summit of the Eight, June 20-22,' indicating

a change from  the G-7 summit to a G-8 summit including

Russia.  What attracts our attention to the Denver summit

logo is the design  showing two mountain peaks upon which

the Japanese and the U.S. flags are  placed at the

respective summits.  Although it is understandable that the 

United States, as host nation, is placed at the summit of

the lower peak, the Rising Sun is raised atop the highest

mountain.  Is this some kind of a  consolation given Japan

because of her earlier reluctance to accept  Russia as a

full member at the Denver summit?"     



RUSSIA:   "Promising Mission" 



Official government Rossiyskaya Gazeta (6/20) pointed out

editorially: "By and large, the mission to Denver looks

promising.  Russia is one of the Eight now." 



"Benevolent Attitude" 



Dmitry Kamyshev wrote on page one of reformist Segodnya

(6/20): "Working from the first minute of the meeting to

its last, Boris Yeltsin will attend all sessions with the

exception of one, an hour-long discussion of matters

concerning currency rates and financial aid.  Those

questions not being of immediate concern, mildly speaking,

to Russia, Yeltsin's non-attendance, according to officials

in Moscow, can in no way be considered as an infringement

on the rights of the new member.  The general atmosphere of

benevolence to Russia on the eve of the meeting, Moscow

analysts suggest, will greatly facilitate the work of the

Russian mission.  The first lines of the final communique,

'We, the eight leading industrial democracies....' must

have a particularly palliative effect on wounded souls

pining for Russia's 'imperial' past.  It is great to be in

such mighty company, if only on paper." 



"Clinton Keeps Word" 



Centrist Nezavisimaya Gazeta (6/20) front-paged an article

by Dmitry Gornostayev: "The 'Eight' formula in Denver is

Russia's undisputed accomplishment in the Boris Yeltsin

era.  But it is true also that the Russian economy today

does not measure up to the status of a 'leading

industrialized power,' one of the Group of Seven.  Many

realize that membership in the elite club is compensation

for the geopolitical losses Russia has sustained recently. 

Clinton has kept his word by persuading Japan to lift her

objections to having the Seven transform itself into an

Eight.  The West wants stability in Russia--it wants

social, economic and military stability, not might--and is

ready to pay for it." 



"New Status: Privileges, Responsibilities" 



Vadim Markushin pointed out in centrist, army Krasnaya

Zvezda (6/20): "Russia's new status certainly spells not

only possible privileges but additional responsibilities,

as well.  With a babble in our system of government, that

creates a risky, slippery ground for the new relationship."











"Poor Cousin" 



Andrei Kabannikov field from Washington for reformist,

youth-oriented Komsomolskaya Pravda (6/20): "Eating at the

same table with those moneybags, Russia, in her current

condition, feels like a poor cousin taking advantage of the

rest of the company's good disposition to ask for a new

loan or a reprieve on old ones."



"Road To Eight Open" 



Reformist Rossiyskiye Vesti (6/19), a newspaper of the

Russian presidential administration, ran this comment by

Ilya Baranikas in Denver: "There is a high degree of

agreement among G-7 members seeking to integrate Russia

into the global economy.  The Denver summit is a major step

to that goal." 



"To Be Equal, Russia Needs Strong Economy" 



Alexei Portansky said in the Finansoviye Izvestia

supplement to reformist Izvestia (6/19): "Transforming the

Seven into an Eight is not an aim unto itself.  The main

idea is for this country to secure the status that belongs

to her by right and to promote domestic reform as best she

can.  It is certainly wrong to view Russia as an absolutely

equal member of the club of the world's industrialized

nations.  As she claims a place in that club, Russia can't

expect to have her voice really heard until there is a

strong and booming economy behind it." 



"Being In Big League Helps Reform" 



Viktor Kremenyuk, deputy director of the U.S. and Canada

Institute, wrote in reformist weekly Obshchaya Gazeta (#

24, 6/19): "Participation in the Big Seven's work will

stimulate the Russian leadership more vigorously to tackle

internal problems, resolve the economic crisis, and draw on

successful experience.  Being in the big league is a long-

term investment." 



"No Way We Can Get In. Not Yet" 



Andrei Kabannikov filed from Denver for reformist, youth-

oriented Komsomolskaya Pravda (6/19): "Try as we might, we

can't be an eighth member now.  That is why they call the

Denver event a 'Summit of the Eight.'  In addition to a

photo of himself in the company of the well-off leaders of

the Seven, Boris Yeltsin would be happy to bring home

something for Russia, like a decision on her admission to

the Paris Club.  At least, that would feel like real

money." 



"G-7 Likely To Accept Russia--Step By Step"



Gennady Sysoyev wrote in reformist weekly Moskovskiye

Novosti (# 24, 6/17): "Those expecting sensational news

from the G-8 summit in Denver are sure to be disappointed. 

Coming back from the meeting, President Yeltsin will have

no membership card to prove Russia has indeed become a full

member of the world's elite club.  But feeling hurt because

of the Western partners' being too cautious would be like

complaining that you cannot have a high-rise built

overnight.  Though the Big Seven is ready to accept Russia,

it would like to do so gradually, step by step.  That is

reality.  You may or may not like it, but you can hardly

change it.  Take it or leave it.  To take it means to

accept the rules of the game.  To leave it means to confess

to not being ready to join civilized society.  The Group of

Seven (or Eight) is certainly not a governing body or the

world's politburo.  But its decisions may open doors to

global financial institutions.  A G-8 membership card, if

secured, is just evidence that Russian reform is

irreversible." 



"G-7 Bound To Become G-8" 



Ilya Baranikas filed from New York for reformist

Rossiyskiye Vesti , a newspaper of the presidential

administration (6/17): "In Washington, Eight is only

mentioned in the context of the 



coming summit in Denver, not as the name of a permanent

international institution....  Russia may some day be in

NATO, who knows.  But she will much sooner be fully

integrated into the world's system of economic

organizations.  No matter how long they take, the leaders

of the Group of Seven will finally take Russia aboard,

transforming itself into a Group of Eight." 



"Summit Won't Make Life Better" 



Reformist, youth-oriented Moskovskiy Komsomolets (6/17)

remarked editorially: "The Russian president's trip to

Denver will have a most vivid coverage.  But, however

successful the outcome, it will have little effect on

Russians.  Whether Russia is still one of the world's

authorities is not among the public's biggest concerns

today." 



"Seven Not To Become Full Eight" 



Vasily Safronchuk said in nationalist opposition Sovetskaya

Rossiya (6/17): "Eager for access to the club of the chosen

few, Boris Yeltsin has pulled all stops to prove to the

West that Russia will never return to socialism and that he

is going to bury the communist ideology for good, along

with Lenin....  Judging by reports, at the summit in

Denver, Russia will hardly become a member of the group of

the world's leading nations, and the Big Seven will not

turn into a full Eight." 



                                 EUROPE

                                    

BELGIUM:  "The G-8 Discovers The Outcasts"  



Pierre Lefevre wrote in independent Le Soir (6/20):   "An

alarm bell has rung....  The emphasis will be placed in

Denver on the need to put back into the race those who have

remained on the side of the road.  This does not stem from

nice feelings, but from political and geopolitical unrest. 

The gap is widening between those who benefit from the

internationalization and those who are unable to follow,

and they are a source of instability....  In terms of

countries, the outcasts of internationalization are

particularly concentrated in black Africa.  The United

States, for reasons of world stability and of national

interest, has begun to take an interest itself about it. 

As a result, Bill Clinton put them on the  agenda of the

summit, setting the tone with his own African initiative,

two days before the Denver meeting.  Here too, the Anglo-

Saxon approach seems likely to prevail.  It results from

the observation that young African economic 'tigers' have

been born:  Uganda, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Zambia.  With

'Asian' growth rates which can reach 12 percent,  those

countries have adopted the principles of market economy.... 

Washington believes that they are the ones via whom the

development of Africa will take place and that they are the

ones to be helped, not through traditional bilateral

assistance which gets lost in the quicksand of corruption,

but by alleviating their debt during the transition

period."



HUNGARY:  "The American Model"



Conservative Magyar Nemzet commented (6/20):  "By  renaming

the G-7 to G-8, Western powers have demonstrated that their 

number one priority is to include Moscow in the mainstream

of  globalization.....  The main focus of the summit will

of course be the  state of the economy.  In this respect,

the United States is in an  excellent situation.... The G-7

summits have rarely ended in surprise in the past but they

have  always resulted in reaching significant decisions. 

Denver's message will  be that of globalization."  

   

"World Economy Has Become Irreversibly Global"



Influential Magyar Hirlap wrote (6/19):  "The admission of

the Russian president in the group carries a symbolic 

meaning: Its basic  message is that the economies of former

communist  countries cannot avoid globalization, either. 

Yeltsin at the moment has  only one trump card: the Russian

market.   Since the Russian economy depends  entirely on

foreign capital, Yeltsin has no real say in this world 

government...but his invitation definitely means that yet

another  



psychological barrier between the East and the West was

removed.  Bill  Clinton will have a very pleasant time in

Denver:  the U.S. economy could  not be healthier and the

cooperation between the Democratic president and  the

Congress with its Republican majority seems to be

excellent."   



NORWAY:   "Chewing The Fat In Denver" 



Business-oriented Dagens Naeringsliv commented (6/19): 

"New initiatives are few and far between as the world's

self-proclaimed leadership, the G-7 group, have their

annual meeting in Denver this weekend.... The absence of

fast growing economies like China and India, and the

weakening of the economies of the G-7 countries (with

United States as the only exception), illustrates how the

G-7 increasingly is becoming a forum for the world's 'old'

industrialized countries. The question of whether the G-7

can maintain its authority in these changing times will be

discussed quietly over some cognac. However, we think a

change in the G-7 membership seems very unlikely." 



POLAND:  "Russia Game" 



Leopold Unger wrote in center-left Gazeta Wyborcza (6/20): 

"The accession to the exclusive club of the richest of the

world  would determine according to Yeltsin (probably

wrongly) the final certification of his democratic

political morality, acknowledgement for his statesman's

status on the global scale and  Russia's position as a

global power. Yeltsin states that by signing the agreement

with NATO in Paris and  thus opening the path to non-

conflictual (temporary) expansion of the treaty, he has

paid a high and sufficiant price for entering the G-7

salons and not only for the Seven and a half  but for a

whole Eight. 



"Yeltsin maintains that moving into the eighth position by

him is  essential not only to save face after the Paris

concessions but to stand against the Duma....  The  highest

educated among the G-7 say that the policy of humiliating

Russia, such as was imposed upon the Germans...should be

avoided.  The West is right when it tries to encircle

Russia with the arms of a  world network of various

institutions and also to strengthen Yeltsin's prestige in

his homeland.  Neither the first nor second guarantees

unconditional continuity of Russian democracy. But it is

worth  trying. Something must be paid for that. Turning the

Seven into the Eight doesn't seem too  high a price."



                          EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC

                                    

AUSTRALIA:  "Accent On Africa At Denver Summit"



The Washington correspondent for the national, conservative

Australian observed (6/20):  "President Clinton says he

wants the Denver meeting  to launch an African initiative

to encourage...investment and promote trade with Africa. 

Much of the summit schedule, he says, will be devoted to

African problems, ranging from debt  relief and trade

access to the hoped-for creation of an indigenous regional

peacekeeping  force....  The emphasis should be on the

United States showing the way for other nations to help 

bring Africa into the global economy and concentrating, as

the Marshall Plan did, on helping the recipients make their

own reforms.  If Clinton and his colleagues get anywhere on

that agenda in Denver, this summit will be much more

important than the annual gabfest and photo opportunity

these meetings have become."



CHINA:  "With Russia, Group Becomes More Political"



Su Haihe wrote in the official Communist Youth League China

Youth Daily (Zhongguo Qingnian Bao, 6/20):  "Russia's

admission to the G-8 represents a significant turning point

in the composition of this gathering of developed nations.

First, confrontations have been reduced between two major

factions of the G-8. The U.S. secretary of state recently

observed that in organizing this summit, the G-7 members

have cast off a psychological barrier in dealing with

Russia.  Second, the summit's agenda has been changed.  



"Economic issues used to top the agenda, but political

issues have emerged as important additions to the

discussion. With Russia's addition to the group, the

influence of the G-8 in the international political arena

will surely become obvious."



SOUTH KOREA:  "Uncle Sam's High Nose" 



Independent Dong-A Ilbo (6/20) commented that "Uncle Sam's

nose is higher than ever.  During the Houston summit in

1990--a year when the U.S. economy was not doing well--

Japan and Germany lectured the United States on how to run

its economy.  President Bush had to listen then.  This

time,  however, it is President Clinton's turn to lecture. 

There seems to be no equal to the robustness of the U.S.

economy.  Meanwhile, Europe and Japan are still struggling

with an economic slump."



"Focusing On Preventing Financial Crises"



Anti-establishment Hankyoreh Shinmun (6/19) commented: 

"Changing  the name of the summit from G-7 to G-8 (sic)

indicates that it now has  different objectives.  The

gathering used to be something like a country  club, but

with Russia now participating, it will serve as a venue to 

address the world economy....  The focus of the summit will

have to be on  the agenda the seven industrialized nations

consider most important,  which is how to deal with

financial crises when they arise.  Also, the  summit will

need to establish international guidelines on how to help 

share economic information and maintain international

financial rules.   The United States will urge other

nations to join in the development plan for  Africa. 

Russia's participation confirms that the capitalistic

system  finally controls the entire world."



"Transformation Into A Political Venue"



Pro-business Joong-Ang Ilbo wrote (6/13):  "The summit in

Denver will likely focus more on the issue of establishing

a new world order than on the economy.  Over the years the

G-7 summit has taken on more of a political character, but

with Russia now participating it has become completely

political....   The United States played a key role in

'embracing' Russia. Enthusiastic about opening a new era

for the G-8, the U.S. wants the WTO to accept Russia.  At

the end of the summit there will probably be a statement

full of rhetoric but empty of substance." 



                               SOUTH ASIA

                                    

INDIA:  "Clinton May Focus On U.S. Foreign Policy At

Summit"



The  centrist Hindu ran this analysis (6/20) by Washington

correspondent Sridhar Krishnaswami:  "Several international

political and economic issues are expected to figure

prominently when the leaders of the seven industrialized

nations and Russia start their formal deliberations on

Friday.  One of the expectations of this Denver summit...is

that...President Clinton will be able to use the

opportunity to bring American foreign policy and world

leadership back in firm focus, given that there has been a

less than expected firm direction in the first six months

of his second term, largely as a result of getting bogged

down in the Democratic Party's campaign finance scandal.... 

Of high priority would be Bosnia, the expansion of NATO,

the integration of France into the military structure, the

Africa initiative...and China and Hong Kong.  Also

mentioned in the list of possible discussions are Iran and

Iraq, the West Asia (sic) Peace Process and the new

developments in the Congo....  The reluctance of the summit

organizers to use G-8 in an official sense and instead

preferring to go by 'Summit of the Eight' is more of

semantics than anything else.  The United States takes the

position that by fully involving Russia in the ways of the

G-7, the political, economic and security transition in

that country is made relatively easy and hence the positive

fallout for the West....  From an economic point of view,

the United States is coming into this year's summit in a

position of strength quite unlike the past when nations

used to criticize Washington for not being able to get its

economic house in order.  But at the same time the

administration here cannot walk away from conditions in

Europe and Japan and their global implications."



                                 AFRICA

                                    

KENYA:  "Message To Africa"



The moderate, independent Standard commented (6/18):  "It

is the Denver summit that countries like Kenya should pay

more attention to.  The G-7 members are expected to

announce tougher measures for countries that expect further

assistance on the road to growth.  What the Americans are

calling their 'Africa initiative,' stressing trade rather

than aid, may come out of the Denver summit more of a

pledge than action, and it will be back to square one--

Africa still needs help.  The Denver meeting is expected to

consider selective assistance, and tougher measures on the

manner of its delivery....  The message coming to Kenyans

from America is that aid will not be automatic, going by

past cases of misuse and misallocation of funds. Years of

summons from the International Monetary Fund and the World

Bank have not changed Kenya from an agrarian society into

anything better." 



UGANDA:  "Africa Plan Welcome"



According to the government-supported New Vision (6/20): 

The United States has unveiled a new trade initiative for

Africa....  President Clinton's plan...has multiple

advantages.  For Africa, it is a chance to break into the

world's largest market (and) to truly become part of the

global economic phenomenon.  It also avails Africa of

scarce investment capital, which would supplement its

limited domestic budgets.  For America, it marks a radical

change in assistance to Africa...(and) gives deserving

African countries a chance to break out of the vicious

circle of aid-graft-debt....  The American initiative also

serves as a wake-up call to African countries which have

not yet commissioned political and economic reforms.  A

long-term agenda for trade and investment is in place, and

here's an opportunity to raise Africa's profile among

American businessmen." 



                              LATIN AMERICA

                                    

BRAZIL:  "U.S.:  Most Prosperous, Dynamic Economy On The

Planet"



Center-left O Estado de S o Paulo observed (6/19): "The

United States lives in peace and enjoys a period of

unqualified economic prosperity for the last 25 years; with

robust growth, a  declining public deficit, the lowest

unemployment rate since the early 70's, the lowest

inflation rate in 10 years and the expansion of exports.  

In contrast, the European and Japanese, former U.S.

strategic allies during the Cold War and now the main

competitors in the new world war for economic markets,

arrived in Denver politically weakened by their  structural

economic problems. Germany and France, the two greatest

economic powers in Europe, are divided regarding the

creation of the European Union and the adoption of the

unified currency, the euro, scheduled to be  instituted by

1999....  In Denver, as well as in Tokyo in 1993, the

American economy will be  the object of great attention,

but this year the emphasis will be on the strength of the

American performance and not on the risks the U.S. places

on the world economy.   The cost to prepare this summit was

$20 million, which is half of  what the French spent to set

up the Lyon summit last year. In Denver,  half of all

expenses were covered by donations made by American

companies  interested in using the summit as an

international stage to promote their  products and services

and show some reasons why the United States today has the 

most prosperous and dynamic economy on the planet."     



                                   ##

                                    

For more information, please contact:



U.S. Information Agency

Office of Public Liaison

Telephone: (202) 619-4355



                                                         

6/20/97

         



                            #  #  #


Return to Foreign Media Reaction Reports page