ACCESSION NUMBER:344856 FILE ID:EUR307 DATE:05/11/94 1ITLE:U.S. WOULD LIKE TO SEE RUSSIA A "PARTNER FOR PEACE" (05/11/94) TEXT:*EUR307 05/11/94 U.S. WOULD LIKE TO SEE RUSSIA A "PARTNER FOR PEACE" (But would not want it to have veto power in NATO) (380) By Jim Shevis USIA Staff Writer Washington -- Just as other former Warsaw Pact nations are eligible to become limited partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), so too is Russia. "We want the West to have a good relationship with Russia," a senior Clinton administration official said May 11. "But it's important for us that NATO not be dominated by Russia, and that they not have veto power." Speaking to reporters at a background briefing, the official said the United States would welcome Russia's application to take part in the "Partnership for Peace" program unveiled at the NATO summit meeting in January. The program, which was proposed by the United States, lays out a blueprint for any European country's eventual NATO membership after proving its commitment to democracy, putting its military under civilian control, and meeting other requirements. With regard to Russia, "we want to avoid two extremes," the administration official said: "first, that it (Russia) not feel isolated and, second, that we are not in a process of confronting them." The official said the "Partnership for Peace" program is the centerpiece of NATO's current activities. One of the reasons why NATO opted for limited membership, rather than immediate, full membership in the security alliance, the official said, is that membership in the security alliance requires the approval of each of the 16 member-countries' parliaments. "I suspect that today it would be impossible to get any single country past every single parliament of the 16 countries," the official said. Meanwhile, "Partnership for Peace" is finding wide acceptance in Europe, the official said. So far, 18 countries have signed framework documents, and five others are considering doing so, the official said. The documents spell out a prospective member's resources and intentions. Turkmenistan, the newest partner, signed on May 10, while Azerbaijan did so on May 2, the official said. Ultimate, full membership in NATO "is going to depend on what these countries do to show their seriousness in engaging with the West; that's instrumental to getting them ready for membership," the official said. NNNN .