COST (In Thousands) | FY 1995 Actual | FY 1996 Estimate | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | Cost to Complete | Total Cost | ||
Total Program Element (PE) Cost | 37789 | 27480 | 9857 | 7202 | 6068 | 4797 | 14238 | ----- | Continuing | Continuing | |
D202 | Army Joint STARS (TIARA) | 34482 | 25747 | 9857 | 7202 | 6068 | 4797 | 14238 | ----- | Continuing | Continuing |
D2CT | JSTARS Operational Test (TIARA) | 3307 | 1733 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ----- | 0 | 5040 |
Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: This is a Tactical Intelligence and Related Activities (TIARA) program. US Forces have an urgent need for a wide-area surveillance and target attack radar system capable of continuous coverage out to a depth in excess of 100km beyond their Forward Line of Troops. Commanders must have the capability to detect, locate, classify and track moving and stationary targets for situation assessment to avoid surprise and attack targets out to the range of existing and developing weapons. The Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) provides battle management and targeting of enemy units at critical times and places so commanders can employ their organic forces and firepower in support of deep, close and rear operations. The joint Army/Air Force program objective is to develop a radar, datalink, ground station, and airframe that will provide the capability to locate, track and classify tracked and wheeled vehicles beyond ground line-of-sight during the day and night and under most weather conditions. Radar data is distributed to ground station modules via a secure surveillance and control data link. The Army will develop the ground components of the JSTARS under this PE, project D202. Also included in this PE is project D2CT with FY 95 and FY 96 funding for the Multi-service Operational Test and Evaluation (MOTE). The projects in this program element support development efforts in the Engineering and Manufacturing development phases of the Acquisition Strategy and are therefore correctly placed in Budget Activity 5.
A. Mission Description and Justification: The Army will develop the ground components of the JSTARS under this PE/Project. The Ground Station Module (GSM) is being developed in a Block approach. Block I GSMs utilize the same prime mission equipment and will be developed and deployed on different platforms. The Block I Medium GSM (MGSM) is housed in a standard S280 shelter and mounted on a 5 Ton Truck. The rapidly deployable Block I Light GSM (LGSM) is housed in a Standard Integrated Command Post Shelter (SICPS) and mounted on a High Mobility Multi Purpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV). A Block I Heavy GSM (HGSM) prototype was also assembled. This variant integrated the GSM prime mission equipment into a Command and Control Vehicle (C2V) (a Bradley variant). Also included in this project is the development of the Block II GSM now called the Common Ground Station (CGS). The CGS will integrate signal, imagery, and other intelligence processing into a single ground station, resulting in enhanced battle management as well as significant cost savings. These enhancements are being implemented in a phased approach. Significant enhancements include: integration of Secondary Imagery Dissemination, spare full design/test of the tracked vehicle (heavy) variant, and integration/interface with other sensor systems. This project also includes FY 95 funding for interoperability/system performance assessments between the JSTARS Ground Stations and various allied sensors, as part of the NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance (NAGS) Program. A NAGS Project Office has been established to assess the various alternatives and select the final airborne and ground components. In FY 96, a new PE 1001018A was established to continue the NATO effort.
Acquisition Strategy: In December 1995, the JSTARS Ground Station Program awarded an eight year (basic plus seven (7) one year options) production contract to acquire the balance of ground stations required to meet Army needs. The first two years of the contract are Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) with the first deliveries participating in a November 19 97 Operational Test. This test will support the Milestone three decision scheduled for May 1998. The contract also includes provisions for the design, development and test of various Pre - Planned Product Improvements (P3Is). Following P3I prove out, the modifications are folded into the Production contract via fixed price contract revisions.
FY 1995 Accomplishments:
306 | Obtained Block I Light LRIP Decision | |
4313 | Completed Data Link Mast Head Redesign | |
4866 | Released CGS Solicitation | |
19485 | Continued LGSM EMD Program | |
4012 | Completed LGSM Software Stress Testing | |
1500 | Initiated NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance Support | |
Total | 34482 |
FY 1996 Planned Program:
1834 | Complete LGSM EMD Program | |
12559 | Initiate Phase I CGS Design/System Enhancements | |
1220 | Conduct CGS Phase I Critical Design Review (CDR) | |
9500 | * Continue NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance Support | |
561 | SBIR/STTR reduction not available for execution | |
73 | Revised Economic Assumption not available for execution | |
Total | 25747 |
FY 1997 Planned Program:
7282 | Complete CGS Phase I Integration | |
575 | Complete CGS Phase I Technical/User Assessment | |
2000 | Continue NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance Support | |
Total | 9857 |
B. Project Change Summary | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | |
Previous President's Budget (FY 1996) | 33723 | 16990 | 7884 | |
Appropriated Amount (FY 1995) | 33032 | |||
Adjustment to FY 1995 | 1450 | |||
Appropriated Amount (FY 1996) | 26007 | |||
Adjustments to FY 1996 | -260 | |||
Adjustments to BY (FY 1997) since FY 1996 Presidents Budget | 1973 | |||
Current President Budget Submit | 34482 | 25747 | 9857 |
Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY 95 reduction for federally funded research development center rescission (-50)
FY 95 reprogramming into project for NAGS (+1500)
FY 96 Revised Economic Assumption (-260)
*FY 96 OSD moved funds to PE 10108A
FY97 Revised Inflation Rates (-327)
FY97 Reprogramming into Project for NAGS (+2300)
Change Summary Explanation: (continued)
Schedule: FY 96 Milestone III decision moved from FY 96 to FY98 per approved acquisition strategy. FY 96 production contract redesignated LRIP.
C. Other Program Funding Summary | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
BA1080 Joint STARS Army TIARA Funding | 55239 | 80376 | 85428 | 87659 | 76058 | 104396 | 105486 | Cont | Cont | |
MA9724 | 3063 | |||||||||
BS9724 | 3659 | 8770 | 5748 | 11222 | 10782 | 6979 |
D. Schedule Profile | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
Complete LGSM Software Stress Testing | X* | |||||||||||||||
Release CGS Draft Solicitation | X* | |||||||||||||||
Obtain Block I Light LRIP Decision | X* | |||||||||||||||
Released final CGS Solicitation | X* | |||||||||||||||
CGS LRIP Award | X* | |||||||||||||||
Conduct CGS PDR | X | |||||||||||||||
Complete LGSM EMD Program | X | |||||||||||||||
Conduct CGS Phase I CDR | X | |||||||||||||||
Complete CGS Technical Test | X | |||||||||||||||
First CSG LRIP delivery | X | |||||||||||||||
Complete CGS Operational Test | X |
A. Project Cost Breakdown | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | |
Primary Hardware Development | 19741 | 9681 | 1180 | |
Software Development | 5212 | 7251 | 1164 | |
Integrated Logistics Support | 388 | 265 | 270 | |
Developmental/Operational Test and Evaluation | 783 | 650 | 800 | |
Contractor Engineering Support | 4530 | 4272 | 3921 | |
Government Engineering Support | 564 | 435 | 360 | |
Program Management Support | 1451 | 885 | 915 | |
Program Management Personnel | 1813 | 1674 | 1247 | |
Revised economic assumption not available for execution | 73 | |||
SBIR/STTR reduction not available for execution | 561 | |||
Total | 34482 | 25747 | 9857 |
B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information
Performing Organizations
Contractor or Government Performing Activity | Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle | Award or Obligation Date | Performing Activity EAC |
Project
Office
EAC |
Total
Prior to FY 1995 |
FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | Budget to Complete | Total Program |
Product Development Organizations |
Motorola
(92-C-L001) |
SS/CPFF | May 92 | 99572 | 99572 | 81312 | 17359 | 901 | 0 | 0 | 99572 |
Motorola
(91-C-L006) |
SS/CPFF | Sep 91 | 10780 | 11150 | 11150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11150 |
Motorola
(93-C-K257) |
SS/CPFF | Sep 93 | 9280 | 9280 | 4750 | 4530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9280 |
Motorola
(96-C-S201) |
SS/CPFF | Nov 95 | 10717 | 10911 | 0 | 0 | 3350 | 4248 | 3313 | 10911 |
Motorola
(96-C-S204) |
C/CFP | Dec 95 | 13102 | 13102 | 0 | 0 | 10238 | 2244 | 620 | 13102 |
Motorola
(95-C-S205) |
SS/CPFF | Aug 95 | N/A | 1500 | 0 | 1500 | 5701 | 0 | 0 | 7201 |
Grumman
(90-C-0197) |
SS/CPFF | Feb 92 | 8287 | 7156 | 4000 | 2000 | 1156 | 0 | 0 | 7156 |
E-Systems
(88-C-0080) |
SS/FFP | 2700 | 2700 | 0 | 2700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2700 | |
Cubic
(93-C-0166) |
SS/FPI | Apr 93 | 2614 | 2242 | 1374 | 862 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2242 |
Support and Management Organizations |
CECOM | MIPR | 1060 | 592 | 495 | ||||||
Proj Management | 1759 | 1374 | 1047 | |||||||
Misc | MIPR | 1629 | 845 | 723 |
Test and Evaluation Organizations |
Various | MIPR | 783 | 650 | 800 |
Government Furnished Property
Description Date Prior to
FY 1995 Prior to
FY 1995
Item
Contract
Method/Type
or Funding
Vehicle
Award or
Obligation
Date
Delivery
Total
FY 1995
FY 1996
FY 1997
Budget to
Complete
Total
Program
Product Development Property
Various
Reqn
300
300
300
300
Cont
Cont
Support and Management Property: N/A
Test and Evaluation Property: N/A
Total
FY 1995
FY 1996
FY 1997
Budget to
Complete
Total
Program
Subtotal Funds Not Available for Execution
634
Subtotal Product Development
102886
29251
21652
6792
Cont
Cont
Subtotal Support and Management
4448
2811
2265
Cont
Cont
Subtotal Test and Evaluation
783
650
800
Cont
Cont
Total Project
34482
25747
9857
Cont
Cont
A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification - D2CT provides for the Army's costs associated with the Multi-Service Operational Test and Evaluation (MOTE). All MOTE activities will be completed by 2Q96. This Joint Service Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) will support both the US Army and US Air Force for the Joint STARS Full Scale Production Decisions. (US Air Force in FY 96 and US Army in FY98)
Acquisition Strategy: No applicable
FY 1995 Accomplishments:
2391 | Conducted MOTE Pre Test Planning and Training | |
916 | Developed Instrumentation of Test Hardware, Simulators and Facility | |
Total | 3307 |
FY 1996 Planned Program:
789 | Conduct MOTE | |
900 | Complete Test Analysis and Reports | |
39 | SBIR/STTR Reduction not available for execution | |
5 | Revised economic assumption not available for execution | |
Total | 1733 |
FY 1997 Planned Program: Not Funded in FY97
B. Project Change Summary | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | |
Previous President's Budget (FY 1996) | 5932 | 1781 | 0 | |
Appropriated Amount (FY 1995) | 5807 | |||
Adjustments to FY 1995 | -2500 | |||
Appropriated Amount (FY 1996) | 1750 | 0 | ||
Adjustment to (FY 1996) | -17 | |||
Current Budget Estimate Submission | 3307 | 1733 | 0 |
Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY 95 Reprogramming due to MOTE completion delay from Nov 95 to Mar 96 (-2500)
FY 96 Revised Economic Assumption (-17)
Technical: The MOT&E schedule has been adjusted to permit completion during Operation Joint Endeavor participation.
C. Other Program Funding Summary | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | To
Complete |
Total
Cost | |
101018A NATO Joint STARS * | 0 | 9500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BA1080 Joint STARS Army TIARA Funding | 55239 | 80376 | 85428 | 87659 | 76058 | 104396 | 105486 |
MA9724 | 3063 | ||||||
BS9724 | 3659 | 8770 | 5748 | 11222 | 10782 | 6979 | |
* OSD moved NATO funds to PE 101018A |
D. Schedule Profile | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
MOTE Pre Test Planning and Training | X* | |||||||||||||||
MOTE | X | |||||||||||||||
Prepare MOTE Report | X |
* Army will submit an internal reprogramming to move funds into newly established for NATO.
A. Project Cost Breakdown | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | |
Operational Test and Evaluation | 3307 | 1689 | 0 | |
Revised economic assumption not available for execution | 5 | |||
SBIR/STTR reduction not available for execution | 39 | |||
Total | 3307 | 1733 | 0 |
B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information
Performing Organizations
Contractor or Government Performing Activity | Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle | Award or Obligation Date | Performing Activity EAC |
Project
Office
EAC |
Total
Prior to FY 1995 |
FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | Budget to Complete | Total Program |
Product Development Organizations: N/A |
Support and Management Organizations |
Test and Evaluation Organizations |
OPTEC | MIPR | Dec 94 | 0 | 3307 | 1689 | 0 | 0 | 4996 |
Government Furnished Property: N/A
Subtotal Funds not Available for Execution
44
44
Subtotal Product Development
Subtotal Support and Management
Subtotal Test and Evaluation
3307
1689
4996
Total Project
3307
1733
5040